东西方绿色人力资源管理

IF 0.3 Q4 MANAGEMENT
B. Shahriari, A. Hassanpoor
{"title":"东西方绿色人力资源管理","authors":"B. Shahriari, A. Hassanpoor","doi":"10.20397/2177-6652/2019.V19I2.1546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for paying attention to sustainable development, green issues, and environmental changes is felt more day by day while in green human resource management (GHRM) and greening organizations' human resources are issues paid attention to by different countries seeking to achieve sustainable development and to help preserve the environment. The main purpose of the present study is to perform a systematic review on previously conducted GHRM studies in the east and west during the past ten years. For researchers and managers, this in fact is roughly the best way to share the advantageous information contained by the studies of interest while it also tries to review the findings of various researches in order to signify the similarities and differences that exist in their results, and to underscore the existing gaps. The present research has showed that paying attention to GHRM has significantly increased in east since 2014 while prior to this date, most of the related studies were conducted in the west. For eastern researchers the most interesting functions were respectively education and development (72%), performance management (60%), and rewarding and compensation (56%) as well as other more attention requiring functions including socialization (12%), job analysis (8%), employee retention (8%), and discipline management (4%). On the other hand, the most interesting functions for western researchers were respectively selection and recruiting (61.54%), education and development (53.85%), performance management (53.85%), compensation (53.85%) in addition to other more attention requiring functions including discipline management (0%), socialization (7.69%), employee retention (7.69%), and job analysis (15.38%). The most referred to gaps between the western and eastern studies have turned out to be lack of comprehensive studies in east in addition to the lack of a cross-cultural model which can be utilized for execution of GHRM proportional to the cultures of various different countries. As other gaps in the east it can be referred to cumbersome rules, excessive bureaucracy and hierarchies, lack of managers' support for green plans, and the lack of GHRM training courses, whereas the gaps in the west include lack of comparisons between sustainable and non-sustainable organziations, insufficiency of GHRM related studies, existing of excessive hierarchies in some countries including Brazil, inadequate consideration for the details of GHRM including the manners of absorption of green employees, especially those interested in working with lower wages, and inadequacy of case studies. In the present studies the countries located in Asia are referred to as the east and the countries located in Europe and America continents are referred to as the west.","PeriodicalId":51970,"journal":{"name":"Revista Gestao & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green Human Resource Management in the East and West\",\"authors\":\"B. Shahriari, A. Hassanpoor\",\"doi\":\"10.20397/2177-6652/2019.V19I2.1546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for paying attention to sustainable development, green issues, and environmental changes is felt more day by day while in green human resource management (GHRM) and greening organizations' human resources are issues paid attention to by different countries seeking to achieve sustainable development and to help preserve the environment. The main purpose of the present study is to perform a systematic review on previously conducted GHRM studies in the east and west during the past ten years. For researchers and managers, this in fact is roughly the best way to share the advantageous information contained by the studies of interest while it also tries to review the findings of various researches in order to signify the similarities and differences that exist in their results, and to underscore the existing gaps. The present research has showed that paying attention to GHRM has significantly increased in east since 2014 while prior to this date, most of the related studies were conducted in the west. For eastern researchers the most interesting functions were respectively education and development (72%), performance management (60%), and rewarding and compensation (56%) as well as other more attention requiring functions including socialization (12%), job analysis (8%), employee retention (8%), and discipline management (4%). On the other hand, the most interesting functions for western researchers were respectively selection and recruiting (61.54%), education and development (53.85%), performance management (53.85%), compensation (53.85%) in addition to other more attention requiring functions including discipline management (0%), socialization (7.69%), employee retention (7.69%), and job analysis (15.38%). The most referred to gaps between the western and eastern studies have turned out to be lack of comprehensive studies in east in addition to the lack of a cross-cultural model which can be utilized for execution of GHRM proportional to the cultures of various different countries. As other gaps in the east it can be referred to cumbersome rules, excessive bureaucracy and hierarchies, lack of managers' support for green plans, and the lack of GHRM training courses, whereas the gaps in the west include lack of comparisons between sustainable and non-sustainable organziations, insufficiency of GHRM related studies, existing of excessive hierarchies in some countries including Brazil, inadequate consideration for the details of GHRM including the manners of absorption of green employees, especially those interested in working with lower wages, and inadequacy of case studies. In the present studies the countries located in Asia are referred to as the east and the countries located in Europe and America continents are referred to as the west.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Gestao & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Gestao & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.V19I2.1546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Gestao & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.V19I2.1546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

人们日益感到需要关注可持续发展、绿色问题和环境变化,而在绿色人力资源管理和绿化组织的人力资源方面,寻求实现可持续发展和帮助保护环境的不同国家都关注这些问题。本研究的主要目的是对过去十年中在东部和西部进行的GHRM研究进行系统回顾。事实上,对于研究人员和管理人员来说,这大致是分享感兴趣的研究所包含的有利信息的最佳方式,同时也试图回顾各种研究的结果,以表明其结果中存在的相似性和差异性,并强调现有的差距。目前的研究表明,自2014年以来,东部对GHRM的关注显著增加,而在此之前,大多数相关研究都在西部进行。对东部研究人员来说,最有趣的功能分别是教育和发展(72%)、绩效管理(60%)、奖励和补偿(56%),以及其他更需要关注的功能,包括社会化(12%)、工作分析(8%)、员工保留(8%)和纪律管理(4%)。另一方面,西方研究人员最感兴趣的功能分别是选拔和招聘(61.54%)、教育和发展(53.85%)、绩效管理(53.85%,和工作分析(15.38%)。西方和东方研究之间最常提到的差距是,除了缺乏可用于执行与不同国家文化成比例的GHRM的跨文化模型外,东方缺乏全面的研究。与东部的其他差距一样,它可以指繁琐的规则、过度的官僚作风和等级制度、缺乏管理者对绿色计划的支持以及缺乏全球统一制度培训课程,而西部的差距包括缺乏可持续和非可持续组织之间的比较、全球统一制度相关研究不足、,包括巴西在内的一些国家存在过度的等级制度,对GHRM的细节考虑不足,包括吸收绿色员工的方式,特别是那些对低工资工作感兴趣的员工,以及案例研究不足。在目前的研究中,位于亚洲的国家被称为东方,位于欧洲和美洲大陆的国家被称作西方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green Human Resource Management in the East and West
The need for paying attention to sustainable development, green issues, and environmental changes is felt more day by day while in green human resource management (GHRM) and greening organizations' human resources are issues paid attention to by different countries seeking to achieve sustainable development and to help preserve the environment. The main purpose of the present study is to perform a systematic review on previously conducted GHRM studies in the east and west during the past ten years. For researchers and managers, this in fact is roughly the best way to share the advantageous information contained by the studies of interest while it also tries to review the findings of various researches in order to signify the similarities and differences that exist in their results, and to underscore the existing gaps. The present research has showed that paying attention to GHRM has significantly increased in east since 2014 while prior to this date, most of the related studies were conducted in the west. For eastern researchers the most interesting functions were respectively education and development (72%), performance management (60%), and rewarding and compensation (56%) as well as other more attention requiring functions including socialization (12%), job analysis (8%), employee retention (8%), and discipline management (4%). On the other hand, the most interesting functions for western researchers were respectively selection and recruiting (61.54%), education and development (53.85%), performance management (53.85%), compensation (53.85%) in addition to other more attention requiring functions including discipline management (0%), socialization (7.69%), employee retention (7.69%), and job analysis (15.38%). The most referred to gaps between the western and eastern studies have turned out to be lack of comprehensive studies in east in addition to the lack of a cross-cultural model which can be utilized for execution of GHRM proportional to the cultures of various different countries. As other gaps in the east it can be referred to cumbersome rules, excessive bureaucracy and hierarchies, lack of managers' support for green plans, and the lack of GHRM training courses, whereas the gaps in the west include lack of comparisons between sustainable and non-sustainable organziations, insufficiency of GHRM related studies, existing of excessive hierarchies in some countries including Brazil, inadequate consideration for the details of GHRM including the manners of absorption of green employees, especially those interested in working with lower wages, and inadequacy of case studies. In the present studies the countries located in Asia are referred to as the east and the countries located in Europe and America continents are referred to as the west.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信