从精神论到教育技术论

F. Pasquier
{"title":"从精神论到教育技术论","authors":"F. Pasquier","doi":"10.54808/jsci.20.06.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the traumatic earthquake caused by the wave of terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain, many people questioned the possibility of spirituality in education. For many, a concern on the interest and the possible place of the spiritual in the educational processes found its source following the traumatic collective earthquake caused by the wave of attacks in France in 2015 and then by its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain. These dramatic events have rekindled existential questions that professionals had previously put to one side by lack of a dedicated institutional space and time to reflect on educational bodies aims and modes of operation. This concern is motivated by the idea that our world ought to be passed these behaviors. Indeed, the immense advances in modern technology and the easy access to information it provides, combined with worldwide available primary education seem far from being up to the level we would hope for. This concern is therefore based on an appreciation of a contemporary humanity and state of the world that seems far from being up to the level that would have been hoped for by the immense advances in modern technology, including access to information, combined with a very large scale of primary education across the planet. According to UNESCO's 2013 figures, 92% of the world's population had a mobile phone (55% in developing countries), and 82% of the world's population had completed basic education, the equivalent of primary school (74% in developing countries). Seven years later, the Digital Report 2020 produced by We Are Social and Hootsuite, based on data provided by the UN and government sources, counts for a world population of 7.75 billion people: 17.2% of women and 11.2% of men over 15 are illiterate; \"103% (of) mobile connections as a percentage of the total population\" (due to the possession of multiple devices by some owners and/or of multiple-users for each device); 49% of people are active on social media; 59% of internet users, for an average of 6h43 min, i.e., 40% of the daily waking time. For all that, the overall global situation of humanity still does not seem to have improved, as if, according to the findings of the Complexity Intelligence Network, global connectivity has not resulted in a global human consciousness. Despite these incredible advances, it seems as if the overall global situation of humanity still hasn't improved. In the words of Complexity Intelligence Network, it looks as if global connectivity has not yet resulted in a global human consciousness. It is still being seen as such because of the lack of access to clean water for more than two billion people in 2019, massive displacement of populations for economic, ecological or armed conflict reasons that are not decreasing etc. A central hypothesis of my work is that if the spiritual dimension is in some way already present in schools' curricula and in the common base of schools and colleges' knowledge, skills and culture (especially through the humanities and relational psycho-social skills), then spirituality would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious. From this, I argue that spirituality's positive effects can never be fully realized because it would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious for it to be beneficial. This state of affairs, linked to a kind of repression, would slow down the capacity for the formation and emergence of a person who is responsible and acts in a positive manner towards himself, others and the planet. Therefore, the ongoing objective is to try to better understand and accompany the multi-referential process of our humanization through education, insofar as, as Erasmus stated in the Renaissance: \"We are not born human beings, we each become one\".","PeriodicalId":30249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Spirituality to Technontology in Education\",\"authors\":\"F. Pasquier\",\"doi\":\"10.54808/jsci.20.06.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the traumatic earthquake caused by the wave of terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain, many people questioned the possibility of spirituality in education. For many, a concern on the interest and the possible place of the spiritual in the educational processes found its source following the traumatic collective earthquake caused by the wave of attacks in France in 2015 and then by its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain. These dramatic events have rekindled existential questions that professionals had previously put to one side by lack of a dedicated institutional space and time to reflect on educational bodies aims and modes of operation. This concern is motivated by the idea that our world ought to be passed these behaviors. Indeed, the immense advances in modern technology and the easy access to information it provides, combined with worldwide available primary education seem far from being up to the level we would hope for. This concern is therefore based on an appreciation of a contemporary humanity and state of the world that seems far from being up to the level that would have been hoped for by the immense advances in modern technology, including access to information, combined with a very large scale of primary education across the planet. According to UNESCO's 2013 figures, 92% of the world's population had a mobile phone (55% in developing countries), and 82% of the world's population had completed basic education, the equivalent of primary school (74% in developing countries). Seven years later, the Digital Report 2020 produced by We Are Social and Hootsuite, based on data provided by the UN and government sources, counts for a world population of 7.75 billion people: 17.2% of women and 11.2% of men over 15 are illiterate; \\\"103% (of) mobile connections as a percentage of the total population\\\" (due to the possession of multiple devices by some owners and/or of multiple-users for each device); 49% of people are active on social media; 59% of internet users, for an average of 6h43 min, i.e., 40% of the daily waking time. For all that, the overall global situation of humanity still does not seem to have improved, as if, according to the findings of the Complexity Intelligence Network, global connectivity has not resulted in a global human consciousness. Despite these incredible advances, it seems as if the overall global situation of humanity still hasn't improved. In the words of Complexity Intelligence Network, it looks as if global connectivity has not yet resulted in a global human consciousness. It is still being seen as such because of the lack of access to clean water for more than two billion people in 2019, massive displacement of populations for economic, ecological or armed conflict reasons that are not decreasing etc. A central hypothesis of my work is that if the spiritual dimension is in some way already present in schools' curricula and in the common base of schools and colleges' knowledge, skills and culture (especially through the humanities and relational psycho-social skills), then spirituality would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious. From this, I argue that spirituality's positive effects can never be fully realized because it would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious for it to be beneficial. This state of affairs, linked to a kind of repression, would slow down the capacity for the formation and emergence of a person who is responsible and acts in a positive manner towards himself, others and the planet. Therefore, the ongoing objective is to try to better understand and accompany the multi-referential process of our humanization through education, insofar as, as Erasmus stated in the Renaissance: \\\"We are not born human beings, we each become one\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":30249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.20.06.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.20.06.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继2015年法国恐怖袭击浪潮引发的创伤性地震以及比利时、德国和英国的余震之后,许多人质疑精神教育的可能性。对许多人来说,在2015年法国的袭击浪潮以及比利时、德国和英国的余震引发的创伤性集体地震之后,对精神在教育过程中的兴趣和可能的地位的担忧找到了根源。这些戏剧性的事件重新点燃了专业人士以前因缺乏专门的机构空间和时间来反思教育机构的目标和运作模式而搁置的生存问题。这种担忧的动机是认为我们的世界应该通过这些行为。事实上,现代技术的巨大进步及其提供的信息的便捷获取,再加上世界范围内的初等教育,似乎远未达到我们所希望的水平。因此,这种担忧是基于对当代人类和世界状况的理解,这种理解似乎远未达到现代技术的巨大进步所希望的水平,包括获得信息的机会,再加上全球范围内大规模的初等教育。根据联合国教科文组织2013年的数据,世界92%的人口拥有手机(发展中国家为55%),世界82%的人口完成了相当于小学的基础教育(发展中国家为74%)。七年后,We Are Social and Hootsuite根据联合国和政府提供的数据编制的《2020年数字报告》显示,世界人口为77.5亿:15岁以上的女性和男性文盲分别占17.2%和11.2%;“103%(的)移动连接占总人口的百分比”(由于某些所有者和/或每个设备的多个用户拥有多个设备);49%的人活跃在社交媒体上;59%的互联网用户,平均6小时43分钟,即每天清醒时间的40%。尽管如此,人类的整体全球状况似乎仍未改善,似乎根据复杂性情报网络的调查结果,全球连通性并没有产生全球人类意识。尽管取得了这些令人难以置信的进步,但全球人类的总体状况似乎仍未改善。用复杂性智能网络的话来说,全球连通性似乎还没有产生全球人类意识。由于2019年20多亿人无法获得清洁水,由于经济、生态或武装冲突原因导致人口大规模流离失所,这种情况仍在继续,而且没有减少。我工作的一个核心假设是,如果精神层面在某种程度上已经存在于学校的课程中,以及学校和学院的知识、技能和文化的共同基础中(尤其是通过人文学科和关系心理社会技能),那么精神就永远不会以足够有意识的方式得到锻炼。由此,我认为精神的积极影响永远无法完全实现,因为它永远不会以一种足够有意识的方式来锻炼,使其有益。这种情况与一种镇压有关,会减缓一个对自己、他人和地球负责并采取积极行动的人的形成和出现的能力。因此,目前的目标是试图通过教育更好地理解和伴随我们人性化的多参照过程,正如伊拉斯谟在文艺复兴时期所说:“我们不是天生的人,我们每个人都是一体的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Spirituality to Technontology in Education
Following the traumatic earthquake caused by the wave of terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain, many people questioned the possibility of spirituality in education. For many, a concern on the interest and the possible place of the spiritual in the educational processes found its source following the traumatic collective earthquake caused by the wave of attacks in France in 2015 and then by its aftershocks in Belgium, Germany and Great Britain. These dramatic events have rekindled existential questions that professionals had previously put to one side by lack of a dedicated institutional space and time to reflect on educational bodies aims and modes of operation. This concern is motivated by the idea that our world ought to be passed these behaviors. Indeed, the immense advances in modern technology and the easy access to information it provides, combined with worldwide available primary education seem far from being up to the level we would hope for. This concern is therefore based on an appreciation of a contemporary humanity and state of the world that seems far from being up to the level that would have been hoped for by the immense advances in modern technology, including access to information, combined with a very large scale of primary education across the planet. According to UNESCO's 2013 figures, 92% of the world's population had a mobile phone (55% in developing countries), and 82% of the world's population had completed basic education, the equivalent of primary school (74% in developing countries). Seven years later, the Digital Report 2020 produced by We Are Social and Hootsuite, based on data provided by the UN and government sources, counts for a world population of 7.75 billion people: 17.2% of women and 11.2% of men over 15 are illiterate; "103% (of) mobile connections as a percentage of the total population" (due to the possession of multiple devices by some owners and/or of multiple-users for each device); 49% of people are active on social media; 59% of internet users, for an average of 6h43 min, i.e., 40% of the daily waking time. For all that, the overall global situation of humanity still does not seem to have improved, as if, according to the findings of the Complexity Intelligence Network, global connectivity has not resulted in a global human consciousness. Despite these incredible advances, it seems as if the overall global situation of humanity still hasn't improved. In the words of Complexity Intelligence Network, it looks as if global connectivity has not yet resulted in a global human consciousness. It is still being seen as such because of the lack of access to clean water for more than two billion people in 2019, massive displacement of populations for economic, ecological or armed conflict reasons that are not decreasing etc. A central hypothesis of my work is that if the spiritual dimension is in some way already present in schools' curricula and in the common base of schools and colleges' knowledge, skills and culture (especially through the humanities and relational psycho-social skills), then spirituality would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious. From this, I argue that spirituality's positive effects can never be fully realized because it would never be exercised in a way that is sufficiently conscious for it to be beneficial. This state of affairs, linked to a kind of repression, would slow down the capacity for the formation and emergence of a person who is responsible and acts in a positive manner towards himself, others and the planet. Therefore, the ongoing objective is to try to better understand and accompany the multi-referential process of our humanization through education, insofar as, as Erasmus stated in the Renaissance: "We are not born human beings, we each become one".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信