缓解牧场奶牛生产系统的温室气体排放

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Kearney , E.G. O'Riordan , N. Byrne , J. Breen , P. Crosson
{"title":"缓解牧场奶牛生产系统的温室气体排放","authors":"M. Kearney ,&nbsp;E.G. O'Riordan ,&nbsp;N. Byrne ,&nbsp;J. Breen ,&nbsp;P. Crosson","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p><span>Agriculture<span> and food systems contribute significantly to climate change. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity from beef production are high when compared to other livestock production systems and, therefore, mitigation of these emissions is urgently required. In many countries dairy-beef is making a large and growing contribution to total beef output thereby reducing net emissions given the lower emissions intensity of beef originating from the </span></span>dairy herd when compared to specialized beef-cow systems. GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems can be further reduced by adopting best practice and mitigation technologies.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate a range of management practices to reduce GHG emissions for pasture-based beef cattle production systems, (2) model the individual and combined impacts of these management practices on GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems, and (3) identify any trade-offs between GHG emissions mitigation, farm profitability, food security and land use.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p><span>A farm level bioeconomic systems model was modified to evaluate spring-born, steer production systems finishing cattle at differing slaughter ages and from contrasting forage-based finishing diets (grazed grass or grass silage<span>, each supplemented with concentrates). Mitigation measures included earlier slaughter age, optimal slurry management, </span></span>urease<span> inhibitors for nitrogen (N) fertilizers, replacing cereals with ‘by-products’ in concentrate feed rations and incorporating clover in grassland pastures.</span></p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Combining mitigation strategies reduced dairy-beef systems GHG emissions intensity by an average of 21%. Incorporating clover in grassland pastures was found to be the most profitable stand-alone mitigation strategy increasing net margin by an average of 18%. Substituting by-products for barley in a concentrate ration converted all systems into net producers of human edible protein; otherwise, steer systems finishing at pasture during the third grazing season were the only net producers of human-edible protein. However, finishing at pasture during the third grazing season increased GHG emissions per animal and per kilogram of beef carcass.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Within a grass-based dairy-beef system, such as that modelled in this study, a number of complementary GHG emissions mitigation strategies can be implemented, without making substantive changes to the production system, while simultaneously improving farm profitability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 103748"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Kearney ,&nbsp;E.G. O'Riordan ,&nbsp;N. Byrne ,&nbsp;J. Breen ,&nbsp;P. Crosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p><span>Agriculture<span> and food systems contribute significantly to climate change. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity from beef production are high when compared to other livestock production systems and, therefore, mitigation of these emissions is urgently required. In many countries dairy-beef is making a large and growing contribution to total beef output thereby reducing net emissions given the lower emissions intensity of beef originating from the </span></span>dairy herd when compared to specialized beef-cow systems. GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems can be further reduced by adopting best practice and mitigation technologies.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate a range of management practices to reduce GHG emissions for pasture-based beef cattle production systems, (2) model the individual and combined impacts of these management practices on GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems, and (3) identify any trade-offs between GHG emissions mitigation, farm profitability, food security and land use.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p><span>A farm level bioeconomic systems model was modified to evaluate spring-born, steer production systems finishing cattle at differing slaughter ages and from contrasting forage-based finishing diets (grazed grass or grass silage<span>, each supplemented with concentrates). Mitigation measures included earlier slaughter age, optimal slurry management, </span></span>urease<span> inhibitors for nitrogen (N) fertilizers, replacing cereals with ‘by-products’ in concentrate feed rations and incorporating clover in grassland pastures.</span></p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Combining mitigation strategies reduced dairy-beef systems GHG emissions intensity by an average of 21%. Incorporating clover in grassland pastures was found to be the most profitable stand-alone mitigation strategy increasing net margin by an average of 18%. Substituting by-products for barley in a concentrate ration converted all systems into net producers of human edible protein; otherwise, steer systems finishing at pasture during the third grazing season were the only net producers of human-edible protein. However, finishing at pasture during the third grazing season increased GHG emissions per animal and per kilogram of beef carcass.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Within a grass-based dairy-beef system, such as that modelled in this study, a number of complementary GHG emissions mitigation strategies can be implemented, without making substantive changes to the production system, while simultaneously improving farm profitability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23001531\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23001531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业和粮食系统对气候变化的影响很大。与其他畜牧生产系统相比,牛肉生产的温室气体排放强度很高,因此迫切需要减少这些排放。在许多国家,乳制品牛肉对牛肉总产量的贡献越来越大,从而减少了净排放,因为与专门的肉牛系统相比,来自乳制品牛群的牛肉的排放强度较低。通过采用最佳实践和缓解技术,可以进一步减少乳制品牛肉系统的温室气体排放。目的本研究的目的是(1)评估一系列管理实践,以减少牧场肉牛生产系统的温室气体排放,(2)模拟这些管理实践对乳制品牛肉系统温室气体排放的单独和综合影响,以及(3)确定温室气体排放缓解、农场盈利能力、粮食安全和土地利用之间的任何权衡。方法对农场层面的生物经济系统模型进行了修改,以评估不同屠宰年龄的春生、公牛生产系统精加工牛,并从对比的饲料精加工日粮(放牧草或草青贮饲料,每种饲料都补充浓缩物)中进行精加工。缓解措施包括提前屠宰年龄、优化浆料管理、氮肥的脲酶抑制剂、在浓缩饲料中用“副产品”取代谷物以及在草原牧场种植三叶草。结果和结论组合缓解策略使乳制品-牛肉系统的GHG排放强度平均降低了21%。在草原牧场种植三叶草被发现是最有利可图的独立缓解策略,净利润平均增加18%。在浓缩日粮中用副产品代替大麦将所有系统转化为人类可食用蛋白质的净生产者;除此之外,在第三个放牧季节结束放牧的公牛系统是人类可食用蛋白质的唯一净生产者。然而,在第三个放牧季节结束放牧增加了每只动物和每公斤牛肉胴体的温室气体排放量。重要意义在以草为基础的乳制品牛肉系统中,如本研究中所模拟的系统,可以实施一些互补的温室气体减排战略,而无需对生产系统进行实质性改变,同时提高农场的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems

Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems

CONTEXT

Agriculture and food systems contribute significantly to climate change. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity from beef production are high when compared to other livestock production systems and, therefore, mitigation of these emissions is urgently required. In many countries dairy-beef is making a large and growing contribution to total beef output thereby reducing net emissions given the lower emissions intensity of beef originating from the dairy herd when compared to specialized beef-cow systems. GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems can be further reduced by adopting best practice and mitigation technologies.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate a range of management practices to reduce GHG emissions for pasture-based beef cattle production systems, (2) model the individual and combined impacts of these management practices on GHG emissions from dairy-beef systems, and (3) identify any trade-offs between GHG emissions mitigation, farm profitability, food security and land use.

METHODS

A farm level bioeconomic systems model was modified to evaluate spring-born, steer production systems finishing cattle at differing slaughter ages and from contrasting forage-based finishing diets (grazed grass or grass silage, each supplemented with concentrates). Mitigation measures included earlier slaughter age, optimal slurry management, urease inhibitors for nitrogen (N) fertilizers, replacing cereals with ‘by-products’ in concentrate feed rations and incorporating clover in grassland pastures.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Combining mitigation strategies reduced dairy-beef systems GHG emissions intensity by an average of 21%. Incorporating clover in grassland pastures was found to be the most profitable stand-alone mitigation strategy increasing net margin by an average of 18%. Substituting by-products for barley in a concentrate ration converted all systems into net producers of human edible protein; otherwise, steer systems finishing at pasture during the third grazing season were the only net producers of human-edible protein. However, finishing at pasture during the third grazing season increased GHG emissions per animal and per kilogram of beef carcass.

SIGNIFICANCE

Within a grass-based dairy-beef system, such as that modelled in this study, a number of complementary GHG emissions mitigation strategies can be implemented, without making substantive changes to the production system, while simultaneously improving farm profitability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信