聚焦主题议题:免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)

J. Semple, R. Kapur
{"title":"聚焦主题议题:免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)","authors":"J. Semple, R. Kapur","doi":"10.21037/AOB-2021-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder mediated by anti-platelet autoantibodies and antigen-specific T cells (1,2). These immune effectors either destroy platelets peripherally in the spleen and/or impair platelet production in the bone marrow. The most recent pathophysiologic studies have shown that abnormal T cell responses, particularly, defective T regulatory cell (Treg) activity are central to the autoimmune pathogenesis of ITP and various therapeutics can restore these responses. Just in the last 2 years, for example, there is a significant literature on ITP pathophysiology and it points to the concept that the disease is initiated by flawed self-tolerance mechanisms (1). It appears that understanding how to specifically modulate T cells in patients with ITP will undoubtedly lead to effective antigen-specific therapeutics. This issue of AOB will be dedicated to ITP with a series of manuscripts written by leading experts in the field of ITP management and treatment. It now appears that a great deal of new treatments are available for the disease, and we now have a better understanding of how these new treatments may increase platelet counts in ITP. In the first chapter, Branch (3) and colleagues re-visit what is known about the efficacy and mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment for ITP in adults. IVIg has been used for almost 40 years as a therapeutic for the treatment of ITP and was originally found to be an efficacious treatment for pediatric ITP and later for adults suffering from the disorder. The chapter delves into the success of IVIg treatment over the years and highlights its use with other therapeutics. It points out that despite its many years of use, the mechanism of action of IVIg in ITP still remains controversial with many experimentally-supported theories as to its mechanism of action. Even so, the authors suggest that IVIg will likely continue to be a first-line therapy for adult ITP, particularly when patients suffer from bleeding symptoms. In the second chapter Schmidt (4) and colleagues discuss IVIg usage in pediatric patients with ITP. In childhood ITP, morbidity is significant due to the risk of bleeding and there is a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The authors suggest that IVIg treatment accelerates the remission of thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed ITP and reduces bleeding symptoms, but there are disadvantages such as side effects and costs. They discuss their recent randomized controlled study (TIKI) that showed that IVIg does not affect the development of chronic ITP. It appears that approximately 60% of children with newly diagnosed ITP have a sustained response to IVIg and this response is associated with long-term remission. They then move into recent molecular and clinical data, which shows that treatment responders can be identified before IVIg administration and this is associated with a transient, self-limiting ITP disease course. They conclude by suggesting that the development of clinical and molecular prediction scores could allow for individualized treatment decisions and to design studies aimed at identifying children who benefit from adjunctive or alternative treatments. trials pertaining to the primary and secondary management of primary ITP with a focus on novel agents. They discuss very recent (within 2 years) literature pertaining to articles discussing therapies other than the TPO-RAs or pediatric ITP treatments. They have collated evidence on corticosteroids and IVIG which remain the mainstay of first line management. With respect to second line treatments, in which rituximab and splenectomy were the prominent players, they discuss these and the new therapeutics including the Syk inhibitors, FcRn agonists, MMF and daratumumab.","PeriodicalId":72211,"journal":{"name":"Annals of blood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused themed issue on immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)\",\"authors\":\"J. Semple, R. Kapur\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/AOB-2021-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder mediated by anti-platelet autoantibodies and antigen-specific T cells (1,2). These immune effectors either destroy platelets peripherally in the spleen and/or impair platelet production in the bone marrow. The most recent pathophysiologic studies have shown that abnormal T cell responses, particularly, defective T regulatory cell (Treg) activity are central to the autoimmune pathogenesis of ITP and various therapeutics can restore these responses. Just in the last 2 years, for example, there is a significant literature on ITP pathophysiology and it points to the concept that the disease is initiated by flawed self-tolerance mechanisms (1). It appears that understanding how to specifically modulate T cells in patients with ITP will undoubtedly lead to effective antigen-specific therapeutics. This issue of AOB will be dedicated to ITP with a series of manuscripts written by leading experts in the field of ITP management and treatment. It now appears that a great deal of new treatments are available for the disease, and we now have a better understanding of how these new treatments may increase platelet counts in ITP. In the first chapter, Branch (3) and colleagues re-visit what is known about the efficacy and mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment for ITP in adults. IVIg has been used for almost 40 years as a therapeutic for the treatment of ITP and was originally found to be an efficacious treatment for pediatric ITP and later for adults suffering from the disorder. The chapter delves into the success of IVIg treatment over the years and highlights its use with other therapeutics. It points out that despite its many years of use, the mechanism of action of IVIg in ITP still remains controversial with many experimentally-supported theories as to its mechanism of action. Even so, the authors suggest that IVIg will likely continue to be a first-line therapy for adult ITP, particularly when patients suffer from bleeding symptoms. In the second chapter Schmidt (4) and colleagues discuss IVIg usage in pediatric patients with ITP. In childhood ITP, morbidity is significant due to the risk of bleeding and there is a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The authors suggest that IVIg treatment accelerates the remission of thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed ITP and reduces bleeding symptoms, but there are disadvantages such as side effects and costs. They discuss their recent randomized controlled study (TIKI) that showed that IVIg does not affect the development of chronic ITP. It appears that approximately 60% of children with newly diagnosed ITP have a sustained response to IVIg and this response is associated with long-term remission. They then move into recent molecular and clinical data, which shows that treatment responders can be identified before IVIg administration and this is associated with a transient, self-limiting ITP disease course. They conclude by suggesting that the development of clinical and molecular prediction scores could allow for individualized treatment decisions and to design studies aimed at identifying children who benefit from adjunctive or alternative treatments. trials pertaining to the primary and secondary management of primary ITP with a focus on novel agents. They discuss very recent (within 2 years) literature pertaining to articles discussing therapies other than the TPO-RAs or pediatric ITP treatments. They have collated evidence on corticosteroids and IVIG which remain the mainstay of first line management. With respect to second line treatments, in which rituximab and splenectomy were the prominent players, they discuss these and the new therapeutics including the Syk inhibitors, FcRn agonists, MMF and daratumumab.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of blood\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of blood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOB-2021-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of blood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOB-2021-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是一种由抗血小板自身抗体和抗原特异性T细胞介导的自身免疫性出血性疾病(1,2)。这些免疫效应物破坏脾脏外周的血小板和/或损害骨髓中的血小板产生。最新的病理生理学研究表明,异常的T细胞反应,特别是T调节细胞(Treg)活性缺陷,是ITP自身免疫发病机制的核心,各种治疗方法可以恢复这些反应。例如,就在过去的两年里,有一篇关于ITP病理生理学的重要文献,它指出这种疾病是由有缺陷的自我耐受机制引起的(1)。看来,了解如何特异性调节ITP患者的T细胞无疑将导致有效的抗原特异性治疗。本期AOB将专门讨论ITP,并由ITP管理和治疗领域的顶尖专家撰写一系列手稿。现在看来,这种疾病有很多新的治疗方法,我们现在对这些新的治疗如何增加ITP的血小板计数有了更好的了解。在第一章中,Branch(3)及其同事再次回顾了静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗成人ITP的疗效和作用机制。IVIg作为ITP的治疗药物已经使用了近40年,最初被发现是儿童ITP的有效治疗方法,后来被发现是患有该疾病的成年人的有效治疗手段。本章深入探讨了IVIg治疗多年来的成功,并强调了它与其他疗法的结合。它指出,尽管IVIg在ITP中使用了多年,但其作用机制仍然存在争议,关于其作用机制,有许多实验支持的理论。即便如此,作者认为IVIg可能会继续成为成人ITP的一线治疗方法,尤其是当患者出现出血症状时。在第二章中,Schmidt(4)及其同事讨论了IVIg在ITP患儿中的应用。在儿童ITP中,由于出血风险和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)降低,发病率很高。作者认为,IVIg治疗可以加速新诊断ITP血小板减少症的缓解,并减少出血症状,但也有副作用和费用等缺点。他们讨论了他们最近的随机对照研究(TIKI),该研究表明IVIg不会影响慢性ITP的发展。似乎大约60%的新诊断ITP儿童对IVIg有持续的反应,这种反应与长期缓解有关。然后,他们进入最近的分子和临床数据,这些数据表明,在IVIg给药之前可以确定治疗应答者,这与短暂的、自限性ITP病程有关。他们得出的结论是,临床和分子预测分数的发展可以允许做出个性化的治疗决定,并设计旨在确定受益于辅助或替代治疗的儿童的研究。与原发性ITP的一级和二级管理有关的试验,重点是新型制剂。他们讨论了最近(2年内)与讨论TPO RA或儿科ITP治疗以外的治疗方法的文章有关的文献。他们整理了皮质类固醇和IVIG的证据,这些证据仍然是一线管理的支柱。关于二线治疗,其中利妥昔单抗和脾切除术是主要参与者,他们讨论了这些和新的治疗方法,包括Syk抑制剂、FcRn激动剂、MMF和daratumumab。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focused themed issue on immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder mediated by anti-platelet autoantibodies and antigen-specific T cells (1,2). These immune effectors either destroy platelets peripherally in the spleen and/or impair platelet production in the bone marrow. The most recent pathophysiologic studies have shown that abnormal T cell responses, particularly, defective T regulatory cell (Treg) activity are central to the autoimmune pathogenesis of ITP and various therapeutics can restore these responses. Just in the last 2 years, for example, there is a significant literature on ITP pathophysiology and it points to the concept that the disease is initiated by flawed self-tolerance mechanisms (1). It appears that understanding how to specifically modulate T cells in patients with ITP will undoubtedly lead to effective antigen-specific therapeutics. This issue of AOB will be dedicated to ITP with a series of manuscripts written by leading experts in the field of ITP management and treatment. It now appears that a great deal of new treatments are available for the disease, and we now have a better understanding of how these new treatments may increase platelet counts in ITP. In the first chapter, Branch (3) and colleagues re-visit what is known about the efficacy and mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment for ITP in adults. IVIg has been used for almost 40 years as a therapeutic for the treatment of ITP and was originally found to be an efficacious treatment for pediatric ITP and later for adults suffering from the disorder. The chapter delves into the success of IVIg treatment over the years and highlights its use with other therapeutics. It points out that despite its many years of use, the mechanism of action of IVIg in ITP still remains controversial with many experimentally-supported theories as to its mechanism of action. Even so, the authors suggest that IVIg will likely continue to be a first-line therapy for adult ITP, particularly when patients suffer from bleeding symptoms. In the second chapter Schmidt (4) and colleagues discuss IVIg usage in pediatric patients with ITP. In childhood ITP, morbidity is significant due to the risk of bleeding and there is a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The authors suggest that IVIg treatment accelerates the remission of thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed ITP and reduces bleeding symptoms, but there are disadvantages such as side effects and costs. They discuss their recent randomized controlled study (TIKI) that showed that IVIg does not affect the development of chronic ITP. It appears that approximately 60% of children with newly diagnosed ITP have a sustained response to IVIg and this response is associated with long-term remission. They then move into recent molecular and clinical data, which shows that treatment responders can be identified before IVIg administration and this is associated with a transient, self-limiting ITP disease course. They conclude by suggesting that the development of clinical and molecular prediction scores could allow for individualized treatment decisions and to design studies aimed at identifying children who benefit from adjunctive or alternative treatments. trials pertaining to the primary and secondary management of primary ITP with a focus on novel agents. They discuss very recent (within 2 years) literature pertaining to articles discussing therapies other than the TPO-RAs or pediatric ITP treatments. They have collated evidence on corticosteroids and IVIG which remain the mainstay of first line management. With respect to second line treatments, in which rituximab and splenectomy were the prominent players, they discuss these and the new therapeutics including the Syk inhibitors, FcRn agonists, MMF and daratumumab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信