将彩票激励与彩票中奖保护相结合可提高运动依从性

Q2 Social Sciences
D. Meeker, T. Knight, Patra Childress, E. Aliyev, J. Doctor
{"title":"将彩票激励与彩票中奖保护相结合可提高运动依从性","authors":"D. Meeker, T. Knight, Patra Childress, E. Aliyev, J. Doctor","doi":"10.1177/237946152100700104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two common incentives for participating in exercise programs are cash rewards for meeting goals and the loss of deposited money when goals are missed. Direct cash rewards lead to higher enrollment, but the risk of losing money is a stronger motivator for sticking with a program. We conducted an experiment using loss protection to leverage the power of both approaches. Participants were offered two exercise classes a week for 12 weeks. Anyone who attended the first weekly class received a chance to play a lottery that was very likely to pay a cash reward, but they also faced a low risk of not winning any money. Participants in the loss-protection group could insure against the loss by also attending the second class of the week. Participants in the control group could earn the equivalent money by likewise attending the second class, but the incentive was a straight reward for class participation (a flat payment), not as loss protection. For any weekly pattern of attendance, expected earnings were the same in both groups. We randomly assigned 153 participants to either the loss-protection or the control group. The loss-protection framing resulted in greater exercise class attendance, suggesting that the approach could enhance the outcomes of reward-based programs without increasing program costs.","PeriodicalId":36971,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science and Policy","volume":"7 1","pages":"27 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining a Lottery Incentive with Protection against Losing the Lottery Improves Exercise Adherence\",\"authors\":\"D. Meeker, T. Knight, Patra Childress, E. Aliyev, J. Doctor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/237946152100700104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two common incentives for participating in exercise programs are cash rewards for meeting goals and the loss of deposited money when goals are missed. Direct cash rewards lead to higher enrollment, but the risk of losing money is a stronger motivator for sticking with a program. We conducted an experiment using loss protection to leverage the power of both approaches. Participants were offered two exercise classes a week for 12 weeks. Anyone who attended the first weekly class received a chance to play a lottery that was very likely to pay a cash reward, but they also faced a low risk of not winning any money. Participants in the loss-protection group could insure against the loss by also attending the second class of the week. Participants in the control group could earn the equivalent money by likewise attending the second class, but the incentive was a straight reward for class participation (a flat payment), not as loss protection. For any weekly pattern of attendance, expected earnings were the same in both groups. We randomly assigned 153 participants to either the loss-protection or the control group. The loss-protection framing resulted in greater exercise class attendance, suggesting that the approach could enhance the outcomes of reward-based programs without increasing program costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Science and Policy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Science and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Science and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

参加锻炼项目的两种常见激励措施是达到目标后的现金奖励和未达到目标时的存款损失。直接现金奖励可以提高入学率,但亏损的风险是坚持一个项目的更大动力。我们进行了一项实验,使用损失保护来利用这两种方法的力量。参与者每周上两节运动课,为期12周。任何参加第一节每周课程的人都有机会参加抽奖,很可能会获得现金奖励,但他们也面临着没有中奖的低风险。损失保护组的参与者也可以参加本周的第二节课来投保损失。对照组的参与者可以通过同样参加第二节课赚取同等的钱,但激励措施是对课堂参与的直接奖励(固定付款),而不是作为损失保护。对于任何一周的出勤模式,两组的预期收入都是相同的。我们将153名参与者随机分配到损失保护组或对照组。损失保护框架导致了更多的锻炼班出勤率,这表明该方法可以在不增加项目成本的情况下提高基于奖励的项目的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining a Lottery Incentive with Protection against Losing the Lottery Improves Exercise Adherence
Two common incentives for participating in exercise programs are cash rewards for meeting goals and the loss of deposited money when goals are missed. Direct cash rewards lead to higher enrollment, but the risk of losing money is a stronger motivator for sticking with a program. We conducted an experiment using loss protection to leverage the power of both approaches. Participants were offered two exercise classes a week for 12 weeks. Anyone who attended the first weekly class received a chance to play a lottery that was very likely to pay a cash reward, but they also faced a low risk of not winning any money. Participants in the loss-protection group could insure against the loss by also attending the second class of the week. Participants in the control group could earn the equivalent money by likewise attending the second class, but the incentive was a straight reward for class participation (a flat payment), not as loss protection. For any weekly pattern of attendance, expected earnings were the same in both groups. We randomly assigned 153 participants to either the loss-protection or the control group. The loss-protection framing resulted in greater exercise class attendance, suggesting that the approach could enhance the outcomes of reward-based programs without increasing program costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Science and Policy
Behavioral Science and Policy Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信