{"title":"口腔癌前及恶性病变活检临床诊断的准确性","authors":"Rojin Khaksar, Mohammad-Ali Ranjbar, Zohreh Jaafari-Ashkavandi","doi":"10.1007/s12663-022-01779-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Due to the importance of clinical impression in accurate final diagnosis of oral pathologic lesions, this study evaluated the agreement rate between clinical and histopathological diagnosis in of oral premalignant (PML) and malignant lesions, over a period of 22 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 861 cases were reviewed. Patients' clinical data, type of biopsy, clinical appearance of the lesion, as well as clinical impression and histopathological diagnosis were noted using the archived medical files. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analyzing the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the agreement rate between histopathological and clinical diagnoses was 71.9%. This rate was 71.8% in PML and 75.7% in malignant lesions. The highest agreement among all lesions was found in OLP, in the mouth floor and by oral medicine specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed a relatively high agreement rate between clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of PML and malignant lesions. Clinical presentation, site and type of biopsy, as well as clinicians' specialty were associated with this rate. More education, careful clinical examination, and more cooperation between the surgeon and pathologist are necessary for accurate diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accuracy of Clinical Diagnosis in Biopsied Premalignant and Malignant Oral Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Rojin Khaksar, Mohammad-Ali Ranjbar, Zohreh Jaafari-Ashkavandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-022-01779-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Due to the importance of clinical impression in accurate final diagnosis of oral pathologic lesions, this study evaluated the agreement rate between clinical and histopathological diagnosis in of oral premalignant (PML) and malignant lesions, over a period of 22 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 861 cases were reviewed. Patients' clinical data, type of biopsy, clinical appearance of the lesion, as well as clinical impression and histopathological diagnosis were noted using the archived medical files. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analyzing the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the agreement rate between histopathological and clinical diagnoses was 71.9%. This rate was 71.8% in PML and 75.7% in malignant lesions. The highest agreement among all lesions was found in OLP, in the mouth floor and by oral medicine specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed a relatively high agreement rate between clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of PML and malignant lesions. Clinical presentation, site and type of biopsy, as well as clinicians' specialty were associated with this rate. More education, careful clinical examination, and more cooperation between the surgeon and pathologist are necessary for accurate diagnosis and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"52-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01779-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01779-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Accuracy of Clinical Diagnosis in Biopsied Premalignant and Malignant Oral Lesions.
Objectives: Due to the importance of clinical impression in accurate final diagnosis of oral pathologic lesions, this study evaluated the agreement rate between clinical and histopathological diagnosis in of oral premalignant (PML) and malignant lesions, over a period of 22 years.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 861 cases were reviewed. Patients' clinical data, type of biopsy, clinical appearance of the lesion, as well as clinical impression and histopathological diagnosis were noted using the archived medical files. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analyzing the data.
Results: Overall, the agreement rate between histopathological and clinical diagnoses was 71.9%. This rate was 71.8% in PML and 75.7% in malignant lesions. The highest agreement among all lesions was found in OLP, in the mouth floor and by oral medicine specialists.
Conclusion: The results showed a relatively high agreement rate between clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of PML and malignant lesions. Clinical presentation, site and type of biopsy, as well as clinicians' specialty were associated with this rate. More education, careful clinical examination, and more cooperation between the surgeon and pathologist are necessary for accurate diagnosis and management.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.