公共人工智能想象:1956年至2021年丹麦报纸和杂志如何报道关于人工智能的辩论

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Sne Scott Hansen
{"title":"公共人工智能想象:1956年至2021年丹麦报纸和杂志如何报道关于人工智能的辩论","authors":"Sne Scott Hansen","doi":"10.2478/nor-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates the media's construction of public perceptions of future human–machine relationships related to artificial intelligence (AI) development and reflects on how such perceptions play a role in shaping strategies for the use of AI in Denmark. Through a critical discourse analysis of 253 newspaper and magazine articles published from 1956 to 2021, it shows how conflicting discursive positions are constructed, representing what I refer to as public AI imaginaries. The analysis shows that newspapers and magazines tend not to distinguish between futuristic descriptions of the human–machine relationship of AI and the human-centred principles of intelligence amplification (IA). Furthermore, it demonstrates how principles of IA are reflected in the Danish strategies for AI in practice. While the discursive ambiguity has fuelled public debate, it leaves the term AI relatively vague, thereby creating uncertainty rather than possibilities for a form of human-centered AI in empirical reality.","PeriodicalId":45517,"journal":{"name":"Nordicom Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"56 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021\",\"authors\":\"Sne Scott Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/nor-2022-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article investigates the media's construction of public perceptions of future human–machine relationships related to artificial intelligence (AI) development and reflects on how such perceptions play a role in shaping strategies for the use of AI in Denmark. Through a critical discourse analysis of 253 newspaper and magazine articles published from 1956 to 2021, it shows how conflicting discursive positions are constructed, representing what I refer to as public AI imaginaries. The analysis shows that newspapers and magazines tend not to distinguish between futuristic descriptions of the human–machine relationship of AI and the human-centred principles of intelligence amplification (IA). Furthermore, it demonstrates how principles of IA are reflected in the Danish strategies for AI in practice. While the discursive ambiguity has fuelled public debate, it leaves the term AI relatively vague, thereby creating uncertainty rather than possibilities for a form of human-centered AI in empirical reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordicom Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordicom Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文调查了媒体对与人工智能(AI)发展相关的未来人机关系的公众认知的构建,并反思了这种认知如何在丹麦使用人工智能的策略中发挥作用。通过对1956年至2021年间发表的253篇报纸和杂志文章的批判性话语分析,它展示了如何构建相互冲突的话语立场,代表了我所说的公共人工智能想象。分析表明,报纸和杂志往往不区分未来对人工智能人机关系的描述和以人为中心的智能放大(IA)原则。此外,它还展示了人工智能的原则如何在实践中反映在丹麦的人工智能战略中。虽然话语的模糊性引发了公众的争论,但它使人工智能这个术语相对模糊,从而在经验现实中创造了不确定性,而不是以人为中心的人工智能形式的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021
Abstract This article investigates the media's construction of public perceptions of future human–machine relationships related to artificial intelligence (AI) development and reflects on how such perceptions play a role in shaping strategies for the use of AI in Denmark. Through a critical discourse analysis of 253 newspaper and magazine articles published from 1956 to 2021, it shows how conflicting discursive positions are constructed, representing what I refer to as public AI imaginaries. The analysis shows that newspapers and magazines tend not to distinguish between futuristic descriptions of the human–machine relationship of AI and the human-centred principles of intelligence amplification (IA). Furthermore, it demonstrates how principles of IA are reflected in the Danish strategies for AI in practice. While the discursive ambiguity has fuelled public debate, it leaves the term AI relatively vague, thereby creating uncertainty rather than possibilities for a form of human-centered AI in empirical reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordicom Review
Nordicom Review COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信