以暴制暴:在《盗梦空间》中的思考Φύσις

IF 0.5 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1163/15691640-12341482

S. M. Ewegen

{"title":"以暴制暴:在《盗梦空间》中的思考Φύσις","authors":"S. M. Ewegen","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis essay explores the role of flame in Heidegger’s 1943–44 lectures on Heraclitus (GA 55). Specifically, I trace a tension that unfolds within the text between two flames: namely, “the flames of presumptuous mismeasurement” characteristic of modernity, and the flames of beyng. As I show, in GA 55 Heidegger argues that a certain Seinsvergessenheit has come to dominate the modern world and has resulted in an attitude of hubris on the part of the human being. As a corrective to this hubris, Heraclitus’s thought serves as a reawakening of the meaning of being (as clearing). Heidegger, for reasons which I explore in the essay, understands both the forgetfulness of being, and being itself, in terms of flame. I trace the origins and perimeters of these two flames, marking the character and consequences of this conflict, having recourse to the Heraclitus lectures as well as a number of texts that inform them. I then conclude by broadening the scope of the conflict by examining the role that Christianity plays in fanning the flames of modernity (for Heidegger).","PeriodicalId":44158,"journal":{"name":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fighting Fire with Fire: Thinking Φύσις at the Inception\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Ewegen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15691640-12341482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis essay explores the role of flame in Heidegger’s 1943–44 lectures on Heraclitus (GA 55). Specifically, I trace a tension that unfolds within the text between two flames: namely, “the flames of presumptuous mismeasurement” characteristic of modernity, and the flames of beyng. As I show, in GA 55 Heidegger argues that a certain Seinsvergessenheit has come to dominate the modern world and has resulted in an attitude of hubris on the part of the human being. As a corrective to this hubris, Heraclitus’s thought serves as a reawakening of the meaning of being (as clearing). Heidegger, for reasons which I explore in the essay, understands both the forgetfulness of being, and being itself, in terms of flame. I trace the origins and perimeters of these two flames, marking the character and consequences of this conflict, having recourse to the Heraclitus lectures as well as a number of texts that inform them. I then conclude by broadening the scope of the conflict by examining the role that Christianity plays in fanning the flames of modernity (for Heidegger).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了火焰在海德格尔1943-44年关于赫拉克利特的演讲中的作用。具体地说，我追踪了文本中展开的两种火焰之间的张力:即现代性特征的“自以为是的错误测量的火焰”和存在的火焰。正如我所展示的，在GA 55中，海德格尔认为，某种“理性”(Seinsvergessenheit)已经主宰了现代世界，并导致了人类的一种傲慢态度。作为对这种傲慢的纠正，赫拉克利特的思想重新唤醒了存在的意义(作为清理)。海德格尔，出于我在文章中探讨的原因，从火焰的角度理解存在的遗忘，以及存在本身。我追溯了这两种火焰的起源和边界，标记了这一冲突的特征和后果，并求助于赫拉克利特的演讲以及一些告知他们的文本。然后，我通过考察基督教在煽动现代性火焰(对海德格尔来说)中所扮演的角色，扩大了冲突的范围，从而得出结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fighting Fire with Fire: Thinking Φύσις at the Inception

This essay explores the role of flame in Heidegger’s 1943–44 lectures on Heraclitus (GA 55). Specifically, I trace a tension that unfolds within the text between two flames: namely, “the flames of presumptuous mismeasurement” characteristic of modernity, and the flames of beyng. As I show, in GA 55 Heidegger argues that a certain Seinsvergessenheit has come to dominate the modern world and has resulted in an attitude of hubris on the part of the human being. As a corrective to this hubris, Heraclitus’s thought serves as a reawakening of the meaning of being (as clearing). Heidegger, for reasons which I explore in the essay, understands both the forgetfulness of being, and being itself, in terms of flame. I trace the origins and perimeters of these two flames, marking the character and consequences of this conflict, having recourse to the Heraclitus lectures as well as a number of texts that inform them. I then conclude by broadening the scope of the conflict by examining the role that Christianity plays in fanning the flames of modernity (for Heidegger).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Research in Phenomenology deals with phenomenological philosophy in a broad sense, including original phenomenological research, critical and interpretative studies of major phenomenological thinkers, studies relating phenomenological philosophy to other disciplines, and historical studies of special relevance to phenomenological philosophy.