质子和碳离子束门户特异性QA的独立剂量计算方法的验证

Q1 Health Professions
Michael F. Moyers , Qianxia Wang , Yu Deng , Hongliang Chen , Zhi Chen , Xiaoli Liu , Nicki Schlegel , Jie Li , Zhuangming Shen , James Lin , Pablo Yepes
{"title":"质子和碳离子束门户特异性QA的独立剂量计算方法的验证","authors":"Michael F. Moyers ,&nbsp;Qianxia Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Deng ,&nbsp;Hongliang Chen ,&nbsp;Zhi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Liu ,&nbsp;Nicki Schlegel ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Zhuangming Shen ,&nbsp;James Lin ,&nbsp;Pablo Yepes","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To verify the accuracy of an independent dose calculation method, as incorporated into an <em>in-house</em> developed treatment planning system (TPS), for performing quality assurance of dose distributions delivered to a water phantom planned by a clinical TPS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Monte Carlo based track repeating algorithm was incorporated into an <em>in-house</em> treatment planning system for proton and carbon ion beams. Calculations were performed in a flat water phantom for both a traditional pencil beam algorithm and a new Monte Carlo algorithm, and then compared to measurements made at multiple depths with a 2D ionization array for 44 patient portals. The comparisons utilized a Gamma analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 124 measurements were performed for proton and carbon ion patient portals. Using a small Gamma criteria of 2%/2 ​mm, an average of 93% and 97% of measurement points passed for each portal for pencil beam and Monte Carlo calculations, respectively. The passing rate was substantially higher for Monte Carlo calculations than for pencil beam calculations for portals that used a range shifter.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implemented independent method has been verified against measurements. The high passing rate with small tolerances leads to the possibility of reducing the number of required quality assurance measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 152-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000387/pdfft?md5=3fe2b497a82e3d68e51fa397cb654df7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666555722000387-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of an independent dose calculation method for portal-specific QA of proton and carbon ion beams\",\"authors\":\"Michael F. Moyers ,&nbsp;Qianxia Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Deng ,&nbsp;Hongliang Chen ,&nbsp;Zhi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Liu ,&nbsp;Nicki Schlegel ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Zhuangming Shen ,&nbsp;James Lin ,&nbsp;Pablo Yepes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmp.2022.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To verify the accuracy of an independent dose calculation method, as incorporated into an <em>in-house</em> developed treatment planning system (TPS), for performing quality assurance of dose distributions delivered to a water phantom planned by a clinical TPS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Monte Carlo based track repeating algorithm was incorporated into an <em>in-house</em> treatment planning system for proton and carbon ion beams. Calculations were performed in a flat water phantom for both a traditional pencil beam algorithm and a new Monte Carlo algorithm, and then compared to measurements made at multiple depths with a 2D ionization array for 44 patient portals. The comparisons utilized a Gamma analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 124 measurements were performed for proton and carbon ion patient portals. Using a small Gamma criteria of 2%/2 ​mm, an average of 93% and 97% of measurement points passed for each portal for pencil beam and Monte Carlo calculations, respectively. The passing rate was substantially higher for Monte Carlo calculations than for pencil beam calculations for portals that used a range shifter.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implemented independent method has been verified against measurements. The high passing rate with small tolerances leads to the possibility of reducing the number of required quality assurance measurements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 152-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000387/pdfft?md5=3fe2b497a82e3d68e51fa397cb654df7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666555722000387-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的验证独立剂量计算方法的准确性,并将其纳入自行开发的治疗计划系统(TPS)中,以保证临床TPS计划的水幻影剂量分布的质量。方法将基于蒙特卡罗的轨迹重复算法应用于质子和碳离子束内部处理计划系统。在平面水影中对传统的铅笔束算法和新的蒙特卡罗算法进行了计算,然后与在多个深度使用二维电离阵列对44个患者入口的测量结果进行了比较。比较使用伽玛分析。结果共对质子和碳离子患者入口进行了124次测量。使用2%/ 2mm的小Gamma标准,对于铅笔束和蒙特卡罗计算,每个入口的平均测量点通过率分别为93%和97%。蒙特卡罗计算的通过率比使用移程器的传送门的铅笔光束计算的通过率高得多。结论所建立的独立方法经实测验证。高通过率与小公差导致减少所需的质量保证测量的数量的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verification of an independent dose calculation method for portal-specific QA of proton and carbon ion beams

Objective

To verify the accuracy of an independent dose calculation method, as incorporated into an in-house developed treatment planning system (TPS), for performing quality assurance of dose distributions delivered to a water phantom planned by a clinical TPS.

Methods

A Monte Carlo based track repeating algorithm was incorporated into an in-house treatment planning system for proton and carbon ion beams. Calculations were performed in a flat water phantom for both a traditional pencil beam algorithm and a new Monte Carlo algorithm, and then compared to measurements made at multiple depths with a 2D ionization array for 44 patient portals. The comparisons utilized a Gamma analysis.

Results

A total of 124 measurements were performed for proton and carbon ion patient portals. Using a small Gamma criteria of 2%/2 ​mm, an average of 93% and 97% of measurement points passed for each portal for pencil beam and Monte Carlo calculations, respectively. The passing rate was substantially higher for Monte Carlo calculations than for pencil beam calculations for portals that used a range shifter.

Conclusions

The implemented independent method has been verified against measurements. The high passing rate with small tolerances leads to the possibility of reducing the number of required quality assurance measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信