杀菌剂对威斯康星州用于青贮饲料的玉米-玉米两用和褐色杂交种的影响

IF 1.7 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
M. Chibuogwu, B. Mueller, C. Groves, Damon L. Smith
{"title":"杀菌剂对威斯康星州用于青贮饲料的玉米-玉米两用和褐色杂交种的影响","authors":"M. Chibuogwu, B. Mueller, C. Groves, Damon L. Smith","doi":"10.1094/php-04-23-0036-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decisions about hybrid choice and fungicide application when growing corn (Zea mays L.) for silage are important considerations to maximize sustainable production. The objective of the research was to evaluate how brown midrib (BMR) hybrids compare to dual-purpose hybrids and how fungicides interact with these two classes of corn hybrids. To explore this, field research trials were conducted in Arlington, Wisconsin, in 2020 and 2021. In both years, the trials were arranged in a randomized complete block design and included one brown midrib hybrid, one dual-purpose hybrid, and seven fungicide application regimes. In-field disease rating was done for tar spot (caused by Phyllachora maydis), ear rot and stalk rot (caused by Gibberella zeae). Harvested silage was analyzed for yield, quality, and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration. The selection of hybrid significantly (P < 0.01) influenced the silage quality parameters like starch and total tract neutral detergent fiber digestibility (TTNDFD), a measure of fiber digested throughout the tract of a cow. Fungicide use influenced dry matter yield (P < 0.05), tar spot severity (P < 0.01), and deoxynivalenol concentration (P = 0.05). Our findings suggest that using appropriate fungicides improves yield and reduces disease severity and DON contamination. Better quality silage could be obtained from BMR hybrids at the expense of yield. Therefore, Wisconsin farmers are encouraged to primarily utilize a dual-purpose class of corn hybrids to ensure optimal milk production and secondarily apply fungicides to reduce DON levels in corn chopped for silage.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of fungicides on dual-purpose and brown midrib Zea mays hybrids used for silage in Wisconsin\",\"authors\":\"M. Chibuogwu, B. Mueller, C. Groves, Damon L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/php-04-23-0036-rs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decisions about hybrid choice and fungicide application when growing corn (Zea mays L.) for silage are important considerations to maximize sustainable production. The objective of the research was to evaluate how brown midrib (BMR) hybrids compare to dual-purpose hybrids and how fungicides interact with these two classes of corn hybrids. To explore this, field research trials were conducted in Arlington, Wisconsin, in 2020 and 2021. In both years, the trials were arranged in a randomized complete block design and included one brown midrib hybrid, one dual-purpose hybrid, and seven fungicide application regimes. In-field disease rating was done for tar spot (caused by Phyllachora maydis), ear rot and stalk rot (caused by Gibberella zeae). Harvested silage was analyzed for yield, quality, and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration. The selection of hybrid significantly (P < 0.01) influenced the silage quality parameters like starch and total tract neutral detergent fiber digestibility (TTNDFD), a measure of fiber digested throughout the tract of a cow. Fungicide use influenced dry matter yield (P < 0.05), tar spot severity (P < 0.01), and deoxynivalenol concentration (P = 0.05). Our findings suggest that using appropriate fungicides improves yield and reduces disease severity and DON contamination. Better quality silage could be obtained from BMR hybrids at the expense of yield. Therefore, Wisconsin farmers are encouraged to primarily utilize a dual-purpose class of corn hybrids to ensure optimal milk production and secondarily apply fungicides to reduce DON levels in corn chopped for silage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-04-23-0036-rs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-04-23-0036-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在种植青贮玉米(Zea mays L.)时,关于杂交种选择和杀菌剂应用的决策是最大限度地实现可持续生产的重要考虑因素。本研究的目的是评估褐肋玉米杂交种与两用杂交种的比较,以及杀菌剂如何与这两类玉米杂交种相互作用。为了探索这一点,2020年和2021年在威斯康星州阿灵顿进行了实地研究试验。在这两年中,试验都是以随机完全区组设计进行的,包括一个棕色中脉杂交种、一个两用杂交种和七个杀菌剂施用方案。对焦斑病(由Phyllachora maydis引起)、穗腐病和茎腐病(由Gibberella zeae引起)进行了田间病害分级。分析收获的青贮饲料的产量、质量和脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(DON)浓度。杂交种的选择显著影响了青贮饲料的质量参数,如淀粉和总消化道中性洗涤纤维消化率(TTNDFD),TTNDFD是衡量奶牛消化道中纤维的指标。杀菌剂的使用影响干物质产量(P<0.05)、焦油斑严重程度(P<0.01)和脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇浓度(P=0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,使用适当的杀菌剂可以提高产量,降低疾病严重程度和DON污染。BMR杂交种可以以牺牲产量为代价获得质量更好的青贮饲料。因此,鼓励威斯康星州农民主要使用两用玉米杂交种,以确保最佳的牛奶产量,其次使用杀菌剂,以降低切碎用于青贮的玉米中的DON水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of fungicides on dual-purpose and brown midrib Zea mays hybrids used for silage in Wisconsin
Decisions about hybrid choice and fungicide application when growing corn (Zea mays L.) for silage are important considerations to maximize sustainable production. The objective of the research was to evaluate how brown midrib (BMR) hybrids compare to dual-purpose hybrids and how fungicides interact with these two classes of corn hybrids. To explore this, field research trials were conducted in Arlington, Wisconsin, in 2020 and 2021. In both years, the trials were arranged in a randomized complete block design and included one brown midrib hybrid, one dual-purpose hybrid, and seven fungicide application regimes. In-field disease rating was done for tar spot (caused by Phyllachora maydis), ear rot and stalk rot (caused by Gibberella zeae). Harvested silage was analyzed for yield, quality, and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration. The selection of hybrid significantly (P < 0.01) influenced the silage quality parameters like starch and total tract neutral detergent fiber digestibility (TTNDFD), a measure of fiber digested throughout the tract of a cow. Fungicide use influenced dry matter yield (P < 0.05), tar spot severity (P < 0.01), and deoxynivalenol concentration (P = 0.05). Our findings suggest that using appropriate fungicides improves yield and reduces disease severity and DON contamination. Better quality silage could be obtained from BMR hybrids at the expense of yield. Therefore, Wisconsin farmers are encouraged to primarily utilize a dual-purpose class of corn hybrids to ensure optimal milk production and secondarily apply fungicides to reduce DON levels in corn chopped for silage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Health Progress
Plant Health Progress Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信