Charmides绑架案？

IF 0.1 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG Pub Date : 2021-11-15 DOI:10.3196/004433021834259309

D. Thiel

{"title":"Charmides绑架案？","authors":"D. Thiel","doi":"10.3196/004433021834259309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aristoteteles already knew apart from the deduction (deductio) and the induction (epagoge) the concept he named himself, the abduction (epagoge). However, he did not consider it conclusive, and therefore neglected it. That was also the reason for him to attribute a merely inductive\n method to Socrates who would search for general ethic terms. Due to C. S. Peirce's (1839–1914) accomplishment, abduction was rediscovered and was able to realize its full logical potential. According to his theory, only abduction makes creative thinking possible. This essay tries to\n apply abduction to Charmides ' Platon for the very first time. It proves, that in core scenes during the dialogue surprising proposals are made, which lead with the application of the abduction and with the aim of answering the what-is-what-question to new definitions and general terms.\n It's about working out the affinity between the abduction, like Peirce demands, and the socratic method in search for general terms.","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abduktion im Charmides?\",\"authors\":\"D. Thiel\",\"doi\":\"10.3196/004433021834259309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aristoteteles already knew apart from the deduction (deductio) and the induction (epagoge) the concept he named himself, the abduction (epagoge). However, he did not consider it conclusive, and therefore neglected it. That was also the reason for him to attribute a merely inductive\\n method to Socrates who would search for general ethic terms. Due to C. S. Peirce's (1839–1914) accomplishment, abduction was rediscovered and was able to realize its full logical potential. According to his theory, only abduction makes creative thinking possible. This essay tries to\\n apply abduction to Charmides ' Platon for the very first time. It proves, that in core scenes during the dialogue surprising proposals are made, which lead with the application of the abduction and with the aim of answering the what-is-what-question to new definitions and general terms.\\n It's about working out the affinity between the abduction, like Peirce demands, and the socratic method in search for general terms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433021834259309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433021834259309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

亚里士多德已经知道，除了演绎(演绎)和归纳法(归纳)他给自己命名的概念，溯因法(归纳)。然而，他不认为这是决定性的，因此忽略了它。这也是他认为苏格拉底只会用归纳法来寻找一般伦理术语的原因。由于皮尔斯(c.s. Peirce, 1839-1914)的成就，溯因论被重新发现，并得以充分发挥其逻辑潜力。根据他的理论，只有诱拐才能使创造性思维成为可能。本文首次尝试将溯因法运用到查米德斯的《柏拉图》中。事实证明，在对话的核心场景中提出了令人惊讶的建议，这些建议导致了绑架的应用，目的是回答什么是什么问题的新定义和一般术语。这是关于找出绑架之间的关系，就像皮尔斯要求的那样，以及寻找一般术语的苏格拉底方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Abduktion im Charmides?

Aristoteteles already knew apart from the deduction (deductio) and the induction (epagoge) the concept he named himself, the abduction (epagoge). However, he did not consider it conclusive, and therefore neglected it. That was also the reason for him to attribute a merely inductive method to Socrates who would search for general ethic terms. Due to C. S. Peirce's (1839–1914) accomplishment, abduction was rediscovered and was able to realize its full logical potential. According to his theory, only abduction makes creative thinking possible. This essay tries to apply abduction to Charmides ' Platon for the very first time. It proves, that in core scenes during the dialogue surprising proposals are made, which lead with the application of the abduction and with the aim of answering the what-is-what-question to new definitions and general terms. It's about working out the affinity between the abduction, like Peirce demands, and the socratic method in search for general terms.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mit diesem Doppelheft beginnt die Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung ihren 50. Jahrgang. Ihre Gründung im Frühjahr 1946 verdankt sie einem glücklichen Zusammenwirken. Die Initiative eines Münchner Philosophen aus Bulgarien verbindet sich mit dem Sachverstand namhafter Professoren, die damals noch aus ganz Deutschland, nicht nur dem Westen kommen. Ob er sie "nur" als Autoren oder zusätzlich für den Beirat der Redaktion gewinnt - von Anfang an versichert sich Georgi Schischkoff der Mitarbeit fast aller großen Namen der Zeit. Zunächst sind es etwa der Philosoph und Pädagoge Friedrich Bollnow, der Platon-Forscher Ernst Hoffmann, der Philosoph und Psychologe Philipp Lersch und die Philosophen Walter Bröcker und Wilhelm Weischedel.