LMA ProSeal从患者前部和头部插入特性的比较:一项随机试点研究

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rashmi Salhotra, Kushal Thakkar, Rajesh Singh Rautela, Jainendra Chauhan, S Ajeeb
{"title":"LMA ProSeal从患者前部和头部插入特性的比较:一项随机试点研究","authors":"Rashmi Salhotra, Kushal Thakkar, Rajesh Singh Rautela, Jainendra Chauhan, S Ajeeb","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_240_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>LMA ProSeal (PLMA) is a commonly used airway maintenance device in elective procedures and is routinely inserted from the head-end of the patient. It is also used in pre-hospital emergencies where it may not always be possible to access the head-end. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of PLMA when inserted while standing, either at the head-end or from the front.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After institutional ethics committee approval, 60 consenting patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, and scheduled to undergo elective surgeries were randomly allocated to either group H (head-end insertion) or group F (front-end insertion). Patients with anticipated difficult airway, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, and who were pregnant were excluded. Insertion time, ease of insertion, fiber optic view, ease of drain tube insertion, number of attempts and success rate were noted. Normally distributed quantitative variables were compared using <i>t</i>-test, and qualitative variables were compared using Chi-squared test. A <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insertion time in group H (23.76 ± 4.48 s) was lesser than in group F (30.53 ± 6.23s) (<i>P</i> = 0.027). Ease of insertion (<i>P</i> = 0.052), fiber optic view, ease of drain tube placement (<i>P</i> = 1.000), and number of attempts (<i>P</i> = 1.000) were comparable among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the insertion time from the front is longer than from the head-end, the other insertion characteristics of PLMA including ease of its insertion, placement and success rate of placement are similar when it is inserted from the front or from the head-end. It is an appropriate airway device for securing the airway when the head-end is inaccessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal from the front and head-end of the patient: A randomized pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Salhotra, Kushal Thakkar, Rajesh Singh Rautela, Jainendra Chauhan, S Ajeeb\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_240_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>LMA ProSeal (PLMA) is a commonly used airway maintenance device in elective procedures and is routinely inserted from the head-end of the patient. It is also used in pre-hospital emergencies where it may not always be possible to access the head-end. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of PLMA when inserted while standing, either at the head-end or from the front.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After institutional ethics committee approval, 60 consenting patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, and scheduled to undergo elective surgeries were randomly allocated to either group H (head-end insertion) or group F (front-end insertion). Patients with anticipated difficult airway, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, and who were pregnant were excluded. Insertion time, ease of insertion, fiber optic view, ease of drain tube insertion, number of attempts and success rate were noted. Normally distributed quantitative variables were compared using <i>t</i>-test, and qualitative variables were compared using Chi-squared test. A <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insertion time in group H (23.76 ± 4.48 s) was lesser than in group F (30.53 ± 6.23s) (<i>P</i> = 0.027). Ease of insertion (<i>P</i> = 0.052), fiber optic view, ease of drain tube placement (<i>P</i> = 1.000), and number of attempts (<i>P</i> = 1.000) were comparable among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the insertion time from the front is longer than from the head-end, the other insertion characteristics of PLMA including ease of its insertion, placement and success rate of placement are similar when it is inserted from the front or from the head-end. It is an appropriate airway device for securing the airway when the head-end is inaccessible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_240_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_240_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LMA ProSeal(PLMA)是选择性手术中常用的气道维持装置,通常从患者头端插入。它也用于医院前的紧急情况,在这种情况下,可能并不总是能够接近头端。本研究旨在比较PLMA在站立时插入时的插入特性,无论是在头端还是从正面。在机构伦理委员会批准后,将60名同意接受择期手术的患者随机分配到H组(头端插入)或F组(前端插入),年龄在18至60岁之间,ASA等级为I/II。排除了预期气道困难、慢性呼吸道疾病、肥胖和怀孕的患者。记录插入时间、插入方便性、光纤视图、引流管插入方便性,尝试次数和成功率。正态分布的定量变量采用t检验进行比较,定性变量采用卡方检验进行比较。P<0.05被认为是显著的。结果:H组的插入时间(23.76±4.48 s)小于F组(30.53±6.23 s)(P=0.027)。插入的容易程度(P=0.052)、光纤视图、引流管放置的容易度(P=0.000)和尝试次数(P=1.000)在各组之间具有可比性。尽管从前面插入的时间比从头端插入的时间长,但当从前面或从头端插入时,PLMA的其他插入特性(包括插入的容易性、放置和放置成功率)是相似的。它是一种合适的气道装置,用于在头端无法接近时固定气道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal from the front and head-end of the patient: A randomized pilot study.

Background and aims: LMA ProSeal (PLMA) is a commonly used airway maintenance device in elective procedures and is routinely inserted from the head-end of the patient. It is also used in pre-hospital emergencies where it may not always be possible to access the head-end. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of PLMA when inserted while standing, either at the head-end or from the front.

Material and methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, 60 consenting patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, and scheduled to undergo elective surgeries were randomly allocated to either group H (head-end insertion) or group F (front-end insertion). Patients with anticipated difficult airway, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, and who were pregnant were excluded. Insertion time, ease of insertion, fiber optic view, ease of drain tube insertion, number of attempts and success rate were noted. Normally distributed quantitative variables were compared using t-test, and qualitative variables were compared using Chi-squared test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Insertion time in group H (23.76 ± 4.48 s) was lesser than in group F (30.53 ± 6.23s) (P = 0.027). Ease of insertion (P = 0.052), fiber optic view, ease of drain tube placement (P = 1.000), and number of attempts (P = 1.000) were comparable among the groups.

Conclusion: Although the insertion time from the front is longer than from the head-end, the other insertion characteristics of PLMA including ease of its insertion, placement and success rate of placement are similar when it is inserted from the front or from the head-end. It is an appropriate airway device for securing the airway when the head-end is inaccessible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信