{"title":"一种使用正强化的基于证据的逻辑：对典型批评的回应","authors":"Terrance M. Scott, T. Landrum","doi":"10.1177/1074295620917153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.","PeriodicalId":42674,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Behavior","volume":"29 1","pages":"69 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1074295620917153","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evidence-Based Logic for the Use of Positive Reinforcement: Responses to Typical Criticisms\",\"authors\":\"Terrance M. Scott, T. Landrum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1074295620917153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Behavior\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1074295620917153\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beyond Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620917153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620917153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Evidence-Based Logic for the Use of Positive Reinforcement: Responses to Typical Criticisms
In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
