英国学术图书馆事业的真实状态和地位是什么?一个响应

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ellen Buck
{"title":"英国学术图书馆事业的真实状态和地位是什么?一个响应","authors":"Ellen Buck","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2112484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What a couple of years it has been. We (as society) have had to dig deep, emerging from the pandemic perhaps slightly battered and bruised, perhaps looking at the world through a different lens and, perhaps, asking questions about the “what, where, why, and how” of what we have always done, or perhaps done for too long. In May 2021, a new phrase entered our vernacular, the Great Resignation, coined by Professor Anthony Klotz as a way of understanding a mass exodus from employment and, ultimately, the impact of the pandemic on workforces globally (see Stark, 2021 as one of many press articles on the subject). But the pandemic has not just created a mass exodus. It has also created a pace of, dare I say, unprecedented change in education and the what, where, why, and how. Teaching has shifted from campus to online, and we are now trying to unpack what blended looks like in a post-pandemic world. We are looking to hold on to much of the, arguably, good practice that is evolving from the knee jerk reaction of, to use a technical phrase, the “lift and shift” across rather disconnected learning spaces to something more intentionally and inclusively designed. For libraries, the pandemic has created questions which I believe call for a reimagining in just about everything we do—and how we do it. This includes wrangling the unfathomable and certainly untenable price hikes in e-resources (Gray et al., 2021) but also a need to reimagine our spaces and places, and who we are as professional librarians. As a result, with all of this in mind, I have been interested to see editorials from Wales (2021) and Appleton (2022) chewing over the state of academic librarianship and future gazing the post-COVID academic library environment. I have been thinking about this in relation to the university library in my care over the last year. Who are we as a service—and as professionals within it? How is this evolving, and how do we know that (a) we are getting it right and (b) understanding where there are synergies across professions, institutions, and sectors—and clearly reasoned differences? How do we make space for us to be “the expert in the room”? What skills, knowledge, and behaviors does this mean the professional librarians we employ need? Can we future gaze these and get ahead—be proactive rather than reactive? What follows are my own reflections on these very questions—and hopefully, at least in part, one response to Tim’s question on the state and status of academic librarianship in the UK. Maybe I can also create a “public Twitter spat between librarians.”","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"28 1","pages":"227 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is the True State and Status of Academic Librarianship in the UK? A Response\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Buck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614533.2022.2112484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What a couple of years it has been. We (as society) have had to dig deep, emerging from the pandemic perhaps slightly battered and bruised, perhaps looking at the world through a different lens and, perhaps, asking questions about the “what, where, why, and how” of what we have always done, or perhaps done for too long. In May 2021, a new phrase entered our vernacular, the Great Resignation, coined by Professor Anthony Klotz as a way of understanding a mass exodus from employment and, ultimately, the impact of the pandemic on workforces globally (see Stark, 2021 as one of many press articles on the subject). But the pandemic has not just created a mass exodus. It has also created a pace of, dare I say, unprecedented change in education and the what, where, why, and how. Teaching has shifted from campus to online, and we are now trying to unpack what blended looks like in a post-pandemic world. We are looking to hold on to much of the, arguably, good practice that is evolving from the knee jerk reaction of, to use a technical phrase, the “lift and shift” across rather disconnected learning spaces to something more intentionally and inclusively designed. For libraries, the pandemic has created questions which I believe call for a reimagining in just about everything we do—and how we do it. This includes wrangling the unfathomable and certainly untenable price hikes in e-resources (Gray et al., 2021) but also a need to reimagine our spaces and places, and who we are as professional librarians. As a result, with all of this in mind, I have been interested to see editorials from Wales (2021) and Appleton (2022) chewing over the state of academic librarianship and future gazing the post-COVID academic library environment. I have been thinking about this in relation to the university library in my care over the last year. Who are we as a service—and as professionals within it? How is this evolving, and how do we know that (a) we are getting it right and (b) understanding where there are synergies across professions, institutions, and sectors—and clearly reasoned differences? How do we make space for us to be “the expert in the room”? What skills, knowledge, and behaviors does this mean the professional librarians we employ need? Can we future gaze these and get ahead—be proactive rather than reactive? What follows are my own reflections on these very questions—and hopefully, at least in part, one response to Tim’s question on the state and status of academic librarianship in the UK. Maybe I can also create a “public Twitter spat between librarians.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":38971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"227 - 231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2112484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2112484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

好多年过去了。我们(作为社会)必须深入挖掘,从大流行中走出来,也许会受到轻微的打击和伤害,也许会通过不同的视角看待世界,也许会对我们一直在做的事情提出“什么、在哪里、为什么、如何”的问题,或者可能做得太久了。2021年5月,安东尼·克鲁兹(Anthony Klotz)教授创造了一个新词“大辞职”(Great辞职),以理解大规模失业,并最终理解疫情对全球劳动力的影响(参见史塔克,2021年,这是关于该主题的众多新闻文章之一)。但大流行不仅造成了大规模外流。我敢说,它还在教育以及教育内容、地点、原因和方式方面创造了前所未有的变化。教学已经从校园转移到在线,我们现在正试图解开大流行后世界的混合是什么样子。我们希望能保留很多,可以说是好的做法,这些做法是从膝跳反应演变而来的,用一个技术术语来说,就是“提升和转移”,跨越相当脱节的学习空间,变成更有意和更包容的设计。对于图书馆来说,这场大流行带来了一些问题,我认为这些问题要求我们重新思考我们所做的每一件事,以及我们如何做。这包括争论电子资源难以理解的、当然站不住脚的价格上涨(Gray et al., 2021),但也需要重新想象我们的空间和地方,以及我们作为专业图书馆员的身份。因此,考虑到这一切,我一直有兴趣看到威尔士(2021年)和阿普尔顿(2022年)的社论,他们在讨论学术图书馆的状况,并展望后covid学术图书馆环境的未来。在过去的一年里,我一直在思考与我所照顾的大学图书馆有关的问题。作为一项服务,我们是谁?作为专业人士,我们是谁?这是如何演变的,我们如何知道(a)我们做得对,(b)了解跨专业、机构和部门的协同作用,以及明确的差异?我们怎样才能腾出空间让自己成为“房间里的专家”?这意味着我们雇佣的专业图书馆员需要什么样的技能、知识和行为?我们能否在未来正视这些问题并取得进步——主动而不是被动?以下是我自己对这些问题的思考,希望至少是对蒂姆关于英国学术图书馆的现状和地位的部分回答。也许我还可以创建一个“图书管理员之间的公共推特口水战”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Is the True State and Status of Academic Librarianship in the UK? A Response
What a couple of years it has been. We (as society) have had to dig deep, emerging from the pandemic perhaps slightly battered and bruised, perhaps looking at the world through a different lens and, perhaps, asking questions about the “what, where, why, and how” of what we have always done, or perhaps done for too long. In May 2021, a new phrase entered our vernacular, the Great Resignation, coined by Professor Anthony Klotz as a way of understanding a mass exodus from employment and, ultimately, the impact of the pandemic on workforces globally (see Stark, 2021 as one of many press articles on the subject). But the pandemic has not just created a mass exodus. It has also created a pace of, dare I say, unprecedented change in education and the what, where, why, and how. Teaching has shifted from campus to online, and we are now trying to unpack what blended looks like in a post-pandemic world. We are looking to hold on to much of the, arguably, good practice that is evolving from the knee jerk reaction of, to use a technical phrase, the “lift and shift” across rather disconnected learning spaces to something more intentionally and inclusively designed. For libraries, the pandemic has created questions which I believe call for a reimagining in just about everything we do—and how we do it. This includes wrangling the unfathomable and certainly untenable price hikes in e-resources (Gray et al., 2021) but also a need to reimagine our spaces and places, and who we are as professional librarians. As a result, with all of this in mind, I have been interested to see editorials from Wales (2021) and Appleton (2022) chewing over the state of academic librarianship and future gazing the post-COVID academic library environment. I have been thinking about this in relation to the university library in my care over the last year. Who are we as a service—and as professionals within it? How is this evolving, and how do we know that (a) we are getting it right and (b) understanding where there are synergies across professions, institutions, and sectors—and clearly reasoned differences? How do we make space for us to be “the expert in the room”? What skills, knowledge, and behaviors does this mean the professional librarians we employ need? Can we future gaze these and get ahead—be proactive rather than reactive? What follows are my own reflections on these very questions—and hopefully, at least in part, one response to Tim’s question on the state and status of academic librarianship in the UK. Maybe I can also create a “public Twitter spat between librarians.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信