用我们自己的方式:建立在Leith Mullings的黑人女权主义民族志的基础上

IF 1.6 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
R. J. D. Barnes
{"title":"用我们自己的方式:建立在Leith Mullings的黑人女权主义民族志的基础上","authors":"R. J. D. Barnes","doi":"10.1111/traa.12224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I stage an analytic encounter between two Black female ethnographers, Leith Mullings and myself. Drawing on years of encounters with Dr. Mullings and her work, I explore the development of my research on the Black professional elite, particularly the experiences of cisgender married Black women. By examining my own trajectory from Black female doctoral student to professor, I think through how I first began working on the ethnographic research that became the foundation for my first book to show how we must think critically about the possibilities of choice for Black women who are thinking about work and family options. Through my interactions with Mullings when I was her student at the CUNY Graduate Center, I show how my understandings of the Black community were very different from and also shaped by many of the themes that her research engaged. I discuss how Mullings’s work with female‐headed households complicated my framework, where I interrogate how Black women’s “decisions” were mitigated by work, marriage, and motherhood. Building on Mullings’s groundbreaking work that identified the Sojourner Syndrome and Black women’s resilience and stress, my research highlights the intersectional impact of race and class when Black career women modify their relationship with work. Here, I think about how the space between our research as Black female ethnographers allows for us to fully embrace the complexity and nuance of divergent Black women’s experiences.","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"29 1","pages":"143 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Our Own Terms: Building on Leith Mullings’s Transformative Black Feminist Ethnography\",\"authors\":\"R. J. D. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/traa.12224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I stage an analytic encounter between two Black female ethnographers, Leith Mullings and myself. Drawing on years of encounters with Dr. Mullings and her work, I explore the development of my research on the Black professional elite, particularly the experiences of cisgender married Black women. By examining my own trajectory from Black female doctoral student to professor, I think through how I first began working on the ethnographic research that became the foundation for my first book to show how we must think critically about the possibilities of choice for Black women who are thinking about work and family options. Through my interactions with Mullings when I was her student at the CUNY Graduate Center, I show how my understandings of the Black community were very different from and also shaped by many of the themes that her research engaged. I discuss how Mullings’s work with female‐headed households complicated my framework, where I interrogate how Black women’s “decisions” were mitigated by work, marriage, and motherhood. Building on Mullings’s groundbreaking work that identified the Sojourner Syndrome and Black women’s resilience and stress, my research highlights the intersectional impact of race and class when Black career women modify their relationship with work. Here, I think about how the space between our research as Black female ethnographers allows for us to fully embrace the complexity and nuance of divergent Black women’s experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将在两位黑人女性民族学家,利思·穆林斯和我之间进行一次分析性的相遇。凭借多年来与穆林斯博士的接触和她的工作,我探索了我对黑人专业精英的研究的发展,特别是对异性恋已婚黑人女性的经历。通过审视我自己从黑人女博士生到教授的轨迹,我回顾了我最初是如何开始从事人种学研究的,这成为了我第一本书的基础,这本书展示了我们必须如何批判性地思考黑人女性在考虑工作和家庭选择时的选择可能性。当我还是马林斯在纽约市立大学研究生中心的学生时,通过与她的互动,我展示了我对黑人社区的理解是如何与她的研究所涉及的许多主题截然不同,并受到这些主题的影响。我讨论了Mullings对女性户主家庭的研究如何使我的框架变得复杂,在这里我询问了黑人女性的“决定”是如何被工作、婚姻和母性所减轻的。在穆林斯的开创性工作的基础上,我的研究强调了当黑人职业女性改变她们与工作的关系时,种族和阶级的交叉影响。在这里,我思考我们作为黑人女性人种学家的研究之间的空间如何允许我们完全接受不同黑人女性经历的复杂性和细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Our Own Terms: Building on Leith Mullings’s Transformative Black Feminist Ethnography
In this article, I stage an analytic encounter between two Black female ethnographers, Leith Mullings and myself. Drawing on years of encounters with Dr. Mullings and her work, I explore the development of my research on the Black professional elite, particularly the experiences of cisgender married Black women. By examining my own trajectory from Black female doctoral student to professor, I think through how I first began working on the ethnographic research that became the foundation for my first book to show how we must think critically about the possibilities of choice for Black women who are thinking about work and family options. Through my interactions with Mullings when I was her student at the CUNY Graduate Center, I show how my understandings of the Black community were very different from and also shaped by many of the themes that her research engaged. I discuss how Mullings’s work with female‐headed households complicated my framework, where I interrogate how Black women’s “decisions” were mitigated by work, marriage, and motherhood. Building on Mullings’s groundbreaking work that identified the Sojourner Syndrome and Black women’s resilience and stress, my research highlights the intersectional impact of race and class when Black career women modify their relationship with work. Here, I think about how the space between our research as Black female ethnographers allows for us to fully embrace the complexity and nuance of divergent Black women’s experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信