系统性10-12核TRUS引导活检后的双参数MRI/TRUS融合靶向重复活检显示更显著的前列腺癌症,尤其是位于前方的肿瘤

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2022-03-31 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601221085520
Michael Häggman, Pär Dahlman, Mats Ahlberg, Per Liss, Rafaele Cantera Ahlman, Anca Dragomir, Sam Ladjevardi
{"title":"系统性10-12核TRUS引导活检后的双参数MRI/TRUS融合靶向重复活检显示更显著的前列腺癌症,尤其是位于前方的肿瘤","authors":"Michael Häggman, Pär Dahlman, Mats Ahlberg, Per Liss, Rafaele Cantera Ahlman, Anca Dragomir, Sam Ladjevardi","doi":"10.1177/20584601221085520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI and fusion guided biopsy have an increased role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the possible advantages with Bi-parametric MRI fusion-guided repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12-core biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive men, with previous systematic 10-12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, and with suspicion of, or diagnosis of, low-risk prostate cancer underwent fusion-guided prostate biopsy between February 2015 and February 2017. The material was retrospectively assessed. In 220 cases no previous cancer was diagnosed, and in 203 cases confirmatory fusion guided biopsy was performed prior to active monitoring. MRI was classified according to PI-RADS. Systematic biopsy was compared to fusion guided biopsy for the detection of cancer, and PI-RADS was compared to the Gleason score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fusion guided biopsy detected significantly more cancers than systematic (<i>p</i> < .001). Gleason scores were higher in the fusion biopsy group (<i>p</i> < .001). Anterior tumors were present in 54% of patients. Fusion biopsy from these lesions showed cancer in 53% with previously negative biopsy in systematic biopsies and 66% of them were upgraded from low risk to intermediate or high-risk cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results show superior detection rate and grading of bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12 core biopsies. Fusion guided biopsy detects more significant cancers despite using fewer cores. The risk group was changed for many patients initially selected for active surveillance due to upgrading of tumors. Bi-parametric MRI shows promising results in detecting anterior tumors in patients with suspected prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy after systematic 10-12 core TRUS-guided biopsy reveals more significant prostate cancer especially in anteriorly located tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Häggman, Pär Dahlman, Mats Ahlberg, Per Liss, Rafaele Cantera Ahlman, Anca Dragomir, Sam Ladjevardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20584601221085520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI and fusion guided biopsy have an increased role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the possible advantages with Bi-parametric MRI fusion-guided repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12-core biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive men, with previous systematic 10-12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, and with suspicion of, or diagnosis of, low-risk prostate cancer underwent fusion-guided prostate biopsy between February 2015 and February 2017. The material was retrospectively assessed. In 220 cases no previous cancer was diagnosed, and in 203 cases confirmatory fusion guided biopsy was performed prior to active monitoring. MRI was classified according to PI-RADS. Systematic biopsy was compared to fusion guided biopsy for the detection of cancer, and PI-RADS was compared to the Gleason score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fusion guided biopsy detected significantly more cancers than systematic (<i>p</i> < .001). Gleason scores were higher in the fusion biopsy group (<i>p</i> < .001). Anterior tumors were present in 54% of patients. Fusion biopsy from these lesions showed cancer in 53% with previously negative biopsy in systematic biopsies and 66% of them were upgraded from low risk to intermediate or high-risk cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results show superior detection rate and grading of bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12 core biopsies. Fusion guided biopsy detects more significant cancers despite using fewer cores. The risk group was changed for many patients initially selected for active surveillance due to upgrading of tumors. Bi-parametric MRI shows promising results in detecting anterior tumors in patients with suspected prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980410/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221085520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221085520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景MRI和融合引导活检在诊断癌症中的作用越来越大。目的证明在诊断癌症时,双参数MRI融合引导重复活检优于系统10–12核活检的可能优势。材料和方法在2015年2月至2017年2月期间,连续423名男性,之前有系统的10-12核心TRUS引导活检,怀疑或诊断为低风险前列腺癌症,接受了融合引导前列腺活检。对材料进行了回顾性评估。在220例病例中,没有诊断出以前的癌症,在203例病例中在积极监测之前进行了验证性融合引导活检。MRI根据PI-RADS进行分类。将系统活组织检查与融合引导活组织检查进行比较,以检测癌症,并将PI-RADS与Gleason评分进行比较。结果融合引导活检发现的癌症明显多于系统性(p<0.001)。融合活检组的Gleason评分更高(p<.001)。54%的患者存在前部肿瘤。这些病变的融合活组织检查显示,53%的患者患有癌症,之前系统活组织检查呈阴性,66%的患者从低风险癌症升级为中风险或高风险癌症。结论这些结果表明,与系统的10-12核心活检相比,双参数MRI/TRUS融合靶向重复活检的检出率和分级更高。尽管使用较少的核心,但融合引导的活检可以检测到更显著的癌症。由于肿瘤升级,许多最初选择进行主动监测的患者的风险组发生了变化。双参数MRI在检测疑似前列腺癌症患者的前部肿瘤方面显示出有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy after systematic 10-12 core TRUS-guided biopsy reveals more significant prostate cancer especially in anteriorly located tumors.

Background: MRI and fusion guided biopsy have an increased role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Purpose: To demonstrate the possible advantages with Bi-parametric MRI fusion-guided repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12-core biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Material and methods: Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive men, with previous systematic 10-12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, and with suspicion of, or diagnosis of, low-risk prostate cancer underwent fusion-guided prostate biopsy between February 2015 and February 2017. The material was retrospectively assessed. In 220 cases no previous cancer was diagnosed, and in 203 cases confirmatory fusion guided biopsy was performed prior to active monitoring. MRI was classified according to PI-RADS. Systematic biopsy was compared to fusion guided biopsy for the detection of cancer, and PI-RADS was compared to the Gleason score.

Results: Fusion guided biopsy detected significantly more cancers than systematic (p < .001). Gleason scores were higher in the fusion biopsy group (p < .001). Anterior tumors were present in 54% of patients. Fusion biopsy from these lesions showed cancer in 53% with previously negative biopsy in systematic biopsies and 66% of them were upgraded from low risk to intermediate or high-risk cancers.

Conclusion: These results show superior detection rate and grading of bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy over systematic 10-12 core biopsies. Fusion guided biopsy detects more significant cancers despite using fewer cores. The risk group was changed for many patients initially selected for active surveillance due to upgrading of tumors. Bi-parametric MRI shows promising results in detecting anterior tumors in patients with suspected prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信