但是脚灯为我们做了什么?性别、喜剧与特权政治

Q1 Arts and Humanities
N. Archer
{"title":"但是脚灯为我们做了什么?性别、喜剧与特权政治","authors":"N. Archer","doi":"10.1080/2040610X.2021.1951104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, institutions such as Cambridge University, and Cambridge societies such as Footlights, have been under scrutiny for their perceived elitism. This article nevertheless makes the case that such views overlook the place of gender within these contexts, and above all, the history of gender discrimination and the struggle for representation on the part of women within such institutions. Looking primarily at Footlights, and two of its most prominent early female members (Eleanor Bron and Emma Thompson), and focusing on some of their early work on screen, this article argues that we consider the exceptional nature of female performers emerging from the society. The article argues, in turn, that we take into account the distinctive, critical type of work on the part of these performers, in terms of its comedic and reflextive approach to female representation; arguing also that we link such work to the authorial opportunities, but also competitive contexts, of Cambridge University comedy during these times.","PeriodicalId":38662,"journal":{"name":"Comedy Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"161 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"But what has Footlights ever done for us? Gender, comedy and the politics of privilege\",\"authors\":\"N. Archer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2040610X.2021.1951104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In recent years, institutions such as Cambridge University, and Cambridge societies such as Footlights, have been under scrutiny for their perceived elitism. This article nevertheless makes the case that such views overlook the place of gender within these contexts, and above all, the history of gender discrimination and the struggle for representation on the part of women within such institutions. Looking primarily at Footlights, and two of its most prominent early female members (Eleanor Bron and Emma Thompson), and focusing on some of their early work on screen, this article argues that we consider the exceptional nature of female performers emerging from the society. The article argues, in turn, that we take into account the distinctive, critical type of work on the part of these performers, in terms of its comedic and reflextive approach to female representation; arguing also that we link such work to the authorial opportunities, but also competitive contexts, of Cambridge University comedy during these times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comedy Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comedy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040610X.2021.1951104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comedy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040610X.2021.1951104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来,剑桥大学等机构和Footlights等剑桥社团因其被视为精英主义而受到审查。然而,这篇文章表明,这些观点忽视了性别在这些背景下的地位,尤其是性别歧视的历史和妇女在这些机构中争取代表权的斗争。本文主要关注Footlights及其两位最杰出的早期女性成员(Eleanor Bron和Emma Thompson),并关注她们在银幕上的一些早期作品,认为我们考虑到了从社会中脱颖而出的女性表演者的特殊性。文章认为,反过来,我们考虑到了这些表演者独特的、批判性的作品类型,即其对女性形象的喜剧性和反思性方法;还认为,我们将此类作品与剑桥大学喜剧在这一时期的创作机会以及竞争环境联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
But what has Footlights ever done for us? Gender, comedy and the politics of privilege
Abstract In recent years, institutions such as Cambridge University, and Cambridge societies such as Footlights, have been under scrutiny for their perceived elitism. This article nevertheless makes the case that such views overlook the place of gender within these contexts, and above all, the history of gender discrimination and the struggle for representation on the part of women within such institutions. Looking primarily at Footlights, and two of its most prominent early female members (Eleanor Bron and Emma Thompson), and focusing on some of their early work on screen, this article argues that we consider the exceptional nature of female performers emerging from the society. The article argues, in turn, that we take into account the distinctive, critical type of work on the part of these performers, in terms of its comedic and reflextive approach to female representation; arguing also that we link such work to the authorial opportunities, but also competitive contexts, of Cambridge University comedy during these times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comedy Studies
Comedy Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信