B. Brown, J. Jensen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, Rachel Brown, Damon Rappleyea, A. Schoemann
{"title":"心理、身体、精神和体育:一项针对NCAA学生运动员生物心理社会精神健康干预措施有效性的系统综述","authors":"B. Brown, J. Jensen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, Rachel Brown, Damon Rappleyea, A. Schoemann","doi":"10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT NCAA student-athletes are at risk for various physical (e.g. injury), psychosocial (e.g. depression), and spiritual (e.g. identity development) health concerns. Consequently, researchers and NCAA athletics’ personnel have prioritized conducting research and developing interventions designed to improve the overall health and well-being of student-athletes. This systematic review was guided by the biopsychosocial-spiritual (BPSS) framework to account for student-athletes’ overall health experience. We incorporated Cooper’s [2010. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Sage] seven-step protocol for research synthesis to examine the effectiveness of interventions targeting BPSS health outcomes among NCAA student-athletes. Of the 420 studies retrieved from five electronic databases, a total of 20 studies published between 1989 and 2017 were included for review. Results indicated that mindfulness- and cognitive-behavioral-based interventions may be effective at improving BPSS health outcomes among student-athletes. However, the majority of studies had poor methodological quality and demonstrated high risk of bias, raising concern for the generalizability and validity of findings. Implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":56347,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"235 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind, body, spirit, and sport: A systematic review examining the effectiveness of interventions targeting the biopsychosocial-spiritual health of NCAA student-athletes\",\"authors\":\"B. Brown, J. Jensen, Jennifer L. Hodgson, Rachel Brown, Damon Rappleyea, A. Schoemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT NCAA student-athletes are at risk for various physical (e.g. injury), psychosocial (e.g. depression), and spiritual (e.g. identity development) health concerns. Consequently, researchers and NCAA athletics’ personnel have prioritized conducting research and developing interventions designed to improve the overall health and well-being of student-athletes. This systematic review was guided by the biopsychosocial-spiritual (BPSS) framework to account for student-athletes’ overall health experience. We incorporated Cooper’s [2010. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Sage] seven-step protocol for research synthesis to examine the effectiveness of interventions targeting BPSS health outcomes among NCAA student-athletes. Of the 420 studies retrieved from five electronic databases, a total of 20 studies published between 1989 and 2017 were included for review. Results indicated that mindfulness- and cognitive-behavioral-based interventions may be effective at improving BPSS health outcomes among student-athletes. However, the majority of studies had poor methodological quality and demonstrated high risk of bias, raising concern for the generalizability and validity of findings. Implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2020.1774262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mind, body, spirit, and sport: A systematic review examining the effectiveness of interventions targeting the biopsychosocial-spiritual health of NCAA student-athletes
ABSTRACT NCAA student-athletes are at risk for various physical (e.g. injury), psychosocial (e.g. depression), and spiritual (e.g. identity development) health concerns. Consequently, researchers and NCAA athletics’ personnel have prioritized conducting research and developing interventions designed to improve the overall health and well-being of student-athletes. This systematic review was guided by the biopsychosocial-spiritual (BPSS) framework to account for student-athletes’ overall health experience. We incorporated Cooper’s [2010. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Sage] seven-step protocol for research synthesis to examine the effectiveness of interventions targeting BPSS health outcomes among NCAA student-athletes. Of the 420 studies retrieved from five electronic databases, a total of 20 studies published between 1989 and 2017 were included for review. Results indicated that mindfulness- and cognitive-behavioral-based interventions may be effective at improving BPSS health outcomes among student-athletes. However, the majority of studies had poor methodological quality and demonstrated high risk of bias, raising concern for the generalizability and validity of findings. Implications are discussed.