转型:从(跨性别)角色到简介

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Linacre Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1177/00243639231184041
Hans-Georg Moeller, Paul J D'Ambrosio, Aglaja Stirn, Jorge Ponseti
{"title":"转型:从(跨性别)角色到简介","authors":"Hans-Georg Moeller, Paul J D'Ambrosio, Aglaja Stirn, Jorge Ponseti","doi":"10.1177/00243639231184041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between \"profilicity,\" the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally-with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention-we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles.\",\"authors\":\"Hans-Georg Moeller, Paul J D'Ambrosio, Aglaja Stirn, Jorge Ponseti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00243639231184041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between \\\"profilicity,\\\" the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally-with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention-we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639231184041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639231184041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将哲学方法与实证心理学相结合,研究了“轮廓性”、在指向轮廓的过程中身份的形成与性别认同之间的关系。我们讨论的实证研究表明,在传统(集体主义)社会和现代(个人主义)社会中,跨性别者身份存在显著差异。我们认为,这种差异是由于性别认同的形成从性别角色转向性别特征。为了证实这一说法,我们首先概述了身份和性别的基本理论术语。然后,我们批判性地分析了包括跨性别在内的性别在当代流行文化中的表现。最后,我们讨论了跨性别者身份形成的几个案例研究,目的是描述性的,但不是治疗性的。我们得出的结论是,由性别认同形成的历史转变引起的理论问题,包括跨性别认同形成,最好是从轮廓性的角度来概念化,而不是从仍然流行的真实性语义来概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles.

Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between "profilicity," the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally-with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention-we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信