从干刺的兴起看继承和创新古典针灸的必要性

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Guan-Yuan JIN(金观源) , Louis Lei JIN(金雷) , Belinda Jie HE(何洁) , Bonnie Xia JIN(金霞)
{"title":"从干刺的兴起看继承和创新古典针灸的必要性","authors":"Guan-Yuan JIN(金观源) ,&nbsp;Louis Lei JIN(金雷) ,&nbsp;Belinda Jie HE(何洁) ,&nbsp;Bonnie Xia JIN(金霞)","doi":"10.1016/j.wjam.2023.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>By reviewing the historical background and the current state of dry needling (DN), including the \"Anti-DN Independence\" movement by the acupuncture profession in the west, this paper emphasizes that DN is acupuncture, or more precisely, a \"de-meridian\" style of acupuncture. Clinical applications of DN and its modern studies have seen a tremendous growth spurt during the past two decades, which suggests that the meridian theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may not be the exclusive theory to guide acupuncture. Even certain high-quality DN trials may serve as good examples for acupuncture research, such as refining the stimulation targets in acupoints, recognizing the reflex properties of acupoints known as acu-reflex points (ARPs), or establishing standardized indicators of stimulus amount while objectively assessing the needling efficacy. Like any other therapies, DN has its shares of drawbacks or limitations, which reminds that while innovating classical acupuncture, it is still necessary to inherit the valuable experience of classic acupuncture and the rational core of meridian theory. This is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of clinical acupuncture intervention including DN to broaden the treatment scope and indications of acupuncture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44648,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000314/pdfft?md5=f372ab80b46ee0b577bf97c7fea1ec54&pid=1-s2.0-S1003525723000314-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The necessity of inheritance and innovation of classical acupuncture from the rising of dry needling从干针崛起看古典针灸传承与创新的必要性\",\"authors\":\"Guan-Yuan JIN(金观源) ,&nbsp;Louis Lei JIN(金雷) ,&nbsp;Belinda Jie HE(何洁) ,&nbsp;Bonnie Xia JIN(金霞)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wjam.2023.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>By reviewing the historical background and the current state of dry needling (DN), including the \\\"Anti-DN Independence\\\" movement by the acupuncture profession in the west, this paper emphasizes that DN is acupuncture, or more precisely, a \\\"de-meridian\\\" style of acupuncture. Clinical applications of DN and its modern studies have seen a tremendous growth spurt during the past two decades, which suggests that the meridian theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may not be the exclusive theory to guide acupuncture. Even certain high-quality DN trials may serve as good examples for acupuncture research, such as refining the stimulation targets in acupoints, recognizing the reflex properties of acupoints known as acu-reflex points (ARPs), or establishing standardized indicators of stimulus amount while objectively assessing the needling efficacy. Like any other therapies, DN has its shares of drawbacks or limitations, which reminds that while innovating classical acupuncture, it is still necessary to inherit the valuable experience of classic acupuncture and the rational core of meridian theory. This is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of clinical acupuncture intervention including DN to broaden the treatment scope and indications of acupuncture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000314/pdfft?md5=f372ab80b46ee0b577bf97c7fea1ec54&pid=1-s2.0-S1003525723000314-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过回顾干针(DN)的历史背景和现状,包括西方针灸界的 "反干针独立 "运动,强调干针是针灸,或者更准确地说,是一种 "去经络 "的针灸方式。近二十年来,DN的临床应用及其现代研究取得了突飞猛进的发展,这表明传统中医的经络理论可能并不是指导针灸的唯一理论。即使是某些高质量的 DN 试验,也可作为针灸研究的良好范例,如完善穴位刺激目标、认识穴位的反射特性(即针刺反射点(ARP)),或在客观评估针刺疗效的同时建立标准化的刺激量指标。与其他疗法一样,DN 也有其不足或局限性,这提醒我们在对经典针灸进行创新的同时,仍需继承经典针灸的宝贵经验和经络理论的合理内核。这对于提高包括 DN 在内的临床针灸干预疗效,扩大针灸的治疗范围和适应症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The necessity of inheritance and innovation of classical acupuncture from the rising of dry needling从干针崛起看古典针灸传承与创新的必要性

By reviewing the historical background and the current state of dry needling (DN), including the "Anti-DN Independence" movement by the acupuncture profession in the west, this paper emphasizes that DN is acupuncture, or more precisely, a "de-meridian" style of acupuncture. Clinical applications of DN and its modern studies have seen a tremendous growth spurt during the past two decades, which suggests that the meridian theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may not be the exclusive theory to guide acupuncture. Even certain high-quality DN trials may serve as good examples for acupuncture research, such as refining the stimulation targets in acupoints, recognizing the reflex properties of acupoints known as acu-reflex points (ARPs), or establishing standardized indicators of stimulus amount while objectively assessing the needling efficacy. Like any other therapies, DN has its shares of drawbacks or limitations, which reminds that while innovating classical acupuncture, it is still necessary to inherit the valuable experience of classic acupuncture and the rational core of meridian theory. This is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of clinical acupuncture intervention including DN to broaden the treatment scope and indications of acupuncture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion
World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
1089
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The focus of the journal includes, but is not confined to, clinical research, summaries of clinical experiences, experimental research and clinical reports on needling techniques, moxibustion techniques, acupuncture analgesia and acupuncture anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信