《运动中的马克思:语境中的操作主义》安东尼奥·内格里著(书评)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Carley
{"title":"《运动中的马克思:语境中的操作主义》安东尼奥·内格里著(书评)","authors":"R. Carley","doi":"10.1353/scr.2023.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essays and transcribed talks gathered under the title Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context punctuate the extensive theoretical development of “operaismo,” or “Workerism.” Workerism is a political project developed as a theoretically wrought and non-party affiliated militant communist strategy that, as Harry Cleaver put it, reads Capital politically, specifically, as a document “that reflected a recognition and appreciation of the ability of workers to take the initiative in the class struggle.” The necessarily cooperative and communicative social fabric of “living labor” are, in Workerism, prior to and constitutive of capital in an historical, sociological, political, and economic sense. Both Capital and the Grundrisse have, over time, provided to Workerism a foundation to understand both (the sociality of living) labor and class struggle as autonomous: socially and, then, politically instituent. Regarding the latter, Mario Tronti famously puts it this way: “[. . .] capitalist development becomes subordinated to working class struggles; it follows behind them, and they set the pace to which the political mechanisms of capital’s own reproduction must be tuned.” In Workerism, labor’s de facto social autonomy and, especially, its ability to articulate its autonomy politically is a persistent threat to capital’s ability to fix or dominate it. When it does, it does so principally through technological means; technology, over time, constitutes a part of the reorganization and political (re)activation of the working class. Capital responds; it struggles to compose from out of labor the political and technological means, however crude or sophisticated, to contain labor and extract wealth from it. This is, later on, reflected in Negri’s Spinozism where revolutions in the relations of production are neither antagonistic nor dialectical; they represent two co-extensive singularities with, today, the multitude in the lead and empire treading heavily and directly on its path. Marx in Movement illustrates Negri’s contributions to Workerism from readings of Marx’s Capital and Grundrisse and in dialogue (initially) with Raniero Panzieri, Mario Tronti, Romano Alquati, Sergio Bologna, and Mariarosa Dalla Costa, and then in a critical posture toward Keynesianism, structural-functionalism, post-industrial sociology, Marxist state theory (neo-Gramscian and German Derivationist), and finally in conversation with Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, and more contemporary theorists, in particular, Paulo Virno, Carlo Vercellone, Yann Moulier-Boutang, Maurizio Lazzarato, and Matteo Pasquinelli. This book, especially the last chapter, argues that the methodology of Workerism is conjunctural: responsive to the changing sociality of labor as an","PeriodicalId":42938,"journal":{"name":"South Central Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"115 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context by Antonio Negri (review)\",\"authors\":\"R. Carley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/scr.2023.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essays and transcribed talks gathered under the title Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context punctuate the extensive theoretical development of “operaismo,” or “Workerism.” Workerism is a political project developed as a theoretically wrought and non-party affiliated militant communist strategy that, as Harry Cleaver put it, reads Capital politically, specifically, as a document “that reflected a recognition and appreciation of the ability of workers to take the initiative in the class struggle.” The necessarily cooperative and communicative social fabric of “living labor” are, in Workerism, prior to and constitutive of capital in an historical, sociological, political, and economic sense. Both Capital and the Grundrisse have, over time, provided to Workerism a foundation to understand both (the sociality of living) labor and class struggle as autonomous: socially and, then, politically instituent. Regarding the latter, Mario Tronti famously puts it this way: “[. . .] capitalist development becomes subordinated to working class struggles; it follows behind them, and they set the pace to which the political mechanisms of capital’s own reproduction must be tuned.” In Workerism, labor’s de facto social autonomy and, especially, its ability to articulate its autonomy politically is a persistent threat to capital’s ability to fix or dominate it. When it does, it does so principally through technological means; technology, over time, constitutes a part of the reorganization and political (re)activation of the working class. Capital responds; it struggles to compose from out of labor the political and technological means, however crude or sophisticated, to contain labor and extract wealth from it. This is, later on, reflected in Negri’s Spinozism where revolutions in the relations of production are neither antagonistic nor dialectical; they represent two co-extensive singularities with, today, the multitude in the lead and empire treading heavily and directly on its path. Marx in Movement illustrates Negri’s contributions to Workerism from readings of Marx’s Capital and Grundrisse and in dialogue (initially) with Raniero Panzieri, Mario Tronti, Romano Alquati, Sergio Bologna, and Mariarosa Dalla Costa, and then in a critical posture toward Keynesianism, structural-functionalism, post-industrial sociology, Marxist state theory (neo-Gramscian and German Derivationist), and finally in conversation with Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, and more contemporary theorists, in particular, Paulo Virno, Carlo Vercellone, Yann Moulier-Boutang, Maurizio Lazzarato, and Matteo Pasquinelli. This book, especially the last chapter, argues that the methodology of Workerism is conjunctural: responsive to the changing sociality of labor as an\",\"PeriodicalId\":42938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Central Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Central Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2023.0006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Central Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2023.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这些文章和转录的谈话以《运动中的马克思:语境中的歌剧主义》为标题,强调了“歌剧主义”或“工人主义”的广泛理论发展。工人主义是一个政治项目,发展成为一种理论上精心制定的、与党派无关的激进共产主义战略,正如哈里·克利弗所说,作为一份“反映了对工人在阶级斗争中主动权的认可和赞赏”的文件。在工人主义中,“活劳动”的必然合作和交流的社会结构在历史、社会学、政治和经济意义上先于资本,并构成资本。随着时间的推移,《资本论》和《Grundrise》都为工人主义提供了一个基础,让他们理解(生活的社会性)劳动和阶级斗争是自主的:社会的,然后是政治的灌输。关于后者,马里奥·特隆蒂(Mario Tronti,它在政治上表达自主性的能力是对资本修复或支配它的能力的持续威胁;随着时间的推移,技术构成了工人阶级重组和政治(重新)激活的一部分。资本回应;它努力从劳动力之外构建政治和技术手段,无论多么粗糙或复杂,以遏制劳动力并从中获取财富。这后来反映在奈格里的Spinozism中,在那里,生产关系的革命既不是对立的,也不是辩证的;它们代表了两个共同广泛的奇点,今天,处于领先地位的大众和直接踏上其道路的帝国。《运动中的马克思》通过阅读马克思的《资本论》和《Grundrise》,以及(最初)与拉尼罗·潘齐里、马里奥·特隆蒂、罗曼诺·阿尔夸蒂、塞尔吉奥·博洛尼亚和马里亚罗萨·达拉·科斯塔的对话,阐述了奈格里对工人主义的贡献,然后对凯恩斯主义、结构功能主义、后工业社会学,马克思主义国家理论(新葛兰主义者和德国推导主义者),最后与米歇尔·福柯和吉勒·德勒兹,以及更当代的理论家,特别是保罗·维尔诺、卡洛·韦切隆、扬·穆利尔·布当、毛里齐奥·拉扎拉托和马泰奥·帕斯奎内利进行了对话。这本书,尤其是最后一章,认为工作主义的方法论是联动的:对作为一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context by Antonio Negri (review)
The essays and transcribed talks gathered under the title Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context punctuate the extensive theoretical development of “operaismo,” or “Workerism.” Workerism is a political project developed as a theoretically wrought and non-party affiliated militant communist strategy that, as Harry Cleaver put it, reads Capital politically, specifically, as a document “that reflected a recognition and appreciation of the ability of workers to take the initiative in the class struggle.” The necessarily cooperative and communicative social fabric of “living labor” are, in Workerism, prior to and constitutive of capital in an historical, sociological, political, and economic sense. Both Capital and the Grundrisse have, over time, provided to Workerism a foundation to understand both (the sociality of living) labor and class struggle as autonomous: socially and, then, politically instituent. Regarding the latter, Mario Tronti famously puts it this way: “[. . .] capitalist development becomes subordinated to working class struggles; it follows behind them, and they set the pace to which the political mechanisms of capital’s own reproduction must be tuned.” In Workerism, labor’s de facto social autonomy and, especially, its ability to articulate its autonomy politically is a persistent threat to capital’s ability to fix or dominate it. When it does, it does so principally through technological means; technology, over time, constitutes a part of the reorganization and political (re)activation of the working class. Capital responds; it struggles to compose from out of labor the political and technological means, however crude or sophisticated, to contain labor and extract wealth from it. This is, later on, reflected in Negri’s Spinozism where revolutions in the relations of production are neither antagonistic nor dialectical; they represent two co-extensive singularities with, today, the multitude in the lead and empire treading heavily and directly on its path. Marx in Movement illustrates Negri’s contributions to Workerism from readings of Marx’s Capital and Grundrisse and in dialogue (initially) with Raniero Panzieri, Mario Tronti, Romano Alquati, Sergio Bologna, and Mariarosa Dalla Costa, and then in a critical posture toward Keynesianism, structural-functionalism, post-industrial sociology, Marxist state theory (neo-Gramscian and German Derivationist), and finally in conversation with Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, and more contemporary theorists, in particular, Paulo Virno, Carlo Vercellone, Yann Moulier-Boutang, Maurizio Lazzarato, and Matteo Pasquinelli. This book, especially the last chapter, argues that the methodology of Workerism is conjunctural: responsive to the changing sociality of labor as an
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Central Review
South Central Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信