多中心制度在效应/因果逻辑与企业家决策过程关系中的调节作用

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ivan Garrido, Sílvio Vasconcellos, Kadígia Faccin, Jefferson Marlon Monticelli, Caroline Carpenedo
{"title":"多中心制度在效应/因果逻辑与企业家决策过程关系中的调节作用","authors":"Ivan Garrido,&nbsp;Sílvio Vasconcellos,&nbsp;Kadígia Faccin,&nbsp;Jefferson Marlon Monticelli,&nbsp;Caroline Carpenedo","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyzes how firms respond to institutional polycentrism, a governance system that emerges from multiple and independent centers of power that interact to determine and regulate an evolutionary overarching comprehensive social system of rules. We propose that institutional polycentrism moderates corporate entrepreneurs' decision-making processes. We conducted a case study at a multinational corporation over four decades of internationalization using process data analysis. We found that institutional polycentrism determines a calibration between causation and effectuation logics. The study offers two contributions: (a) expanding the explanatory power of institutional polycentrism by understanding how it moderates the corporate entrepreneur's decision-making process in polycentric institutional contexts and (2) proposing a relatively novel contingency dimension of the effectuation versus causation and establishing new boundary conditions of the effectuation versus causation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyzes the decision-making process of corporate entrepreneurs of a multinational steel producer throughout its internationalization trajectory. The article highlights that decisions based on rules established with past experience are unsuitable in contexts characterized by a multiplicity of foreign institutional forces. The joint interaction of these forces on the firm induces corporate entrepreneurs to respond to such pressures under a new, more flexible, and experimental approach. Finally, the results indicate that institutional multiplicity generates a kind of calibration between these decision-making approaches, contributing to innovation processes in the company.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"11 4","pages":"740-766"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/gsj.1419","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The moderating role of polycentric institutions in the relationship between effectuation/causation logics and corporate entrepreneur's decision-making processes\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Garrido,&nbsp;Sílvio Vasconcellos,&nbsp;Kadígia Faccin,&nbsp;Jefferson Marlon Monticelli,&nbsp;Caroline Carpenedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gsj.1419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study analyzes how firms respond to institutional polycentrism, a governance system that emerges from multiple and independent centers of power that interact to determine and regulate an evolutionary overarching comprehensive social system of rules. We propose that institutional polycentrism moderates corporate entrepreneurs' decision-making processes. We conducted a case study at a multinational corporation over four decades of internationalization using process data analysis. We found that institutional polycentrism determines a calibration between causation and effectuation logics. The study offers two contributions: (a) expanding the explanatory power of institutional polycentrism by understanding how it moderates the corporate entrepreneur's decision-making process in polycentric institutional contexts and (2) proposing a relatively novel contingency dimension of the effectuation versus causation and establishing new boundary conditions of the effectuation versus causation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Managerial summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study analyzes the decision-making process of corporate entrepreneurs of a multinational steel producer throughout its internationalization trajectory. The article highlights that decisions based on rules established with past experience are unsuitable in contexts characterized by a multiplicity of foreign institutional forces. The joint interaction of these forces on the firm induces corporate entrepreneurs to respond to such pressures under a new, more flexible, and experimental approach. Finally, the results indicate that institutional multiplicity generates a kind of calibration between these decision-making approaches, contributing to innovation processes in the company.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Strategy Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"740-766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/gsj.1419\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Strategy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1419\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究分析了企业如何应对制度多中心主义。制度多中心主义是一种由多个独立的权力中心形成的治理体系,这些权力中心相互作用,决定和规范着一个进化的、全面的社会规则体系。我们认为制度多中心主义调节了企业企业家的决策过程。我们使用流程数据分析对一家跨国公司进行了40多年的国际化案例研究。我们发现,制度多中心主义决定了因果逻辑与结果逻辑之间的校准。本研究提供了两个贡献:(1)通过理解制度多中心主义如何调节企业企业家在多中心制度背景下的决策过程,扩大了制度多中心主义的解释力;(2)提出了一个相对新颖的因果因果偶然性维度,并建立了因果因果关系的新边界条件。本研究分析了一家跨国钢铁企业在其国际化轨迹中企业企业家的决策过程。这篇文章强调,根据过去经验制定的规则作出的决定不适用于具有多种外国体制力量特点的情况。这些力量对企业的共同作用促使企业企业家以一种新的、更灵活的、实验性的方法来应对这种压力。最后,研究结果表明,制度多样性在这些决策方法之间产生了一种校准,有助于公司的创新过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The moderating role of polycentric institutions in the relationship between effectuation/causation logics and corporate entrepreneur's decision-making processes

Research Summary

This study analyzes how firms respond to institutional polycentrism, a governance system that emerges from multiple and independent centers of power that interact to determine and regulate an evolutionary overarching comprehensive social system of rules. We propose that institutional polycentrism moderates corporate entrepreneurs' decision-making processes. We conducted a case study at a multinational corporation over four decades of internationalization using process data analysis. We found that institutional polycentrism determines a calibration between causation and effectuation logics. The study offers two contributions: (a) expanding the explanatory power of institutional polycentrism by understanding how it moderates the corporate entrepreneur's decision-making process in polycentric institutional contexts and (2) proposing a relatively novel contingency dimension of the effectuation versus causation and establishing new boundary conditions of the effectuation versus causation.

Managerial summary

This study analyzes the decision-making process of corporate entrepreneurs of a multinational steel producer throughout its internationalization trajectory. The article highlights that decisions based on rules established with past experience are unsuitable in contexts characterized by a multiplicity of foreign institutional forces. The joint interaction of these forces on the firm induces corporate entrepreneurs to respond to such pressures under a new, more flexible, and experimental approach. Finally, the results indicate that institutional multiplicity generates a kind of calibration between these decision-making approaches, contributing to innovation processes in the company.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信