两个逻辑的故事:一所“白人占多数”的中学的校纪与种族差异

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kathryn E. Wiley
{"title":"两个逻辑的故事:一所“白人占多数”的中学的校纪与种族差异","authors":"Kathryn E. Wiley","doi":"10.1086/712084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I use ethnographic data to theorize about the causes of Black-White racial disparities in discipline at a “mostly White” middle school. Using critical race and institutional theories, I identify two racial discipline logics: criminalized sequestering and racial exemption. These logics differently governed how school leaders and teachers administered discipline among Black and White students and created a dual system that generated disparate outcomes. Overall, my analysis aids in understanding the organizational processes that produce Black-White racial discipline disparities, introduces new theoretical concepts for future research, and brings to the fore largely unexamined punitive, in-school discipline practices.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"127 1","pages":"163 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/712084","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two Logics: School Discipline and Racial Disparities in a “Mostly White” Middle School\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn E. Wiley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/712084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I use ethnographic data to theorize about the causes of Black-White racial disparities in discipline at a “mostly White” middle school. Using critical race and institutional theories, I identify two racial discipline logics: criminalized sequestering and racial exemption. These logics differently governed how school leaders and teachers administered discipline among Black and White students and created a dual system that generated disparate outcomes. Overall, my analysis aids in understanding the organizational processes that produce Black-White racial discipline disparities, introduces new theoretical concepts for future research, and brings to the fore largely unexamined punitive, in-school discipline practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/712084\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/712084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在这篇文章中,我使用人种学数据来理论化一所“以白人为主”的中学中黑人-白人种族差异的原因。利用批判性种族和制度理论,我确定了两种种族纪律逻辑:刑事隔离和种族豁免。这些逻辑不同地支配着学校领导和教师如何在黑人和白人学生中管理纪律,并创造了一个产生不同结果的双重系统。总的来说,我的分析有助于理解产生黑人-白人种族纪律差异的组织过程,为未来的研究引入了新的理论概念,并突出了学校纪律实践中基本上未经审查的惩罚性做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tale of Two Logics: School Discipline and Racial Disparities in a “Mostly White” Middle School
In this article, I use ethnographic data to theorize about the causes of Black-White racial disparities in discipline at a “mostly White” middle school. Using critical race and institutional theories, I identify two racial discipline logics: criminalized sequestering and racial exemption. These logics differently governed how school leaders and teachers administered discipline among Black and White students and created a dual system that generated disparate outcomes. Overall, my analysis aids in understanding the organizational processes that produce Black-White racial discipline disparities, introduces new theoretical concepts for future research, and brings to the fore largely unexamined punitive, in-school discipline practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信