查尔斯·尤曼斯主编《马勒在语境中》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021)。344页,84.99英镑。

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Nicholas Attfield
{"title":"查尔斯·尤曼斯主编《马勒在语境中》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021)。344页,84.99英镑。","authors":"Nicholas Attfield","doi":"10.1017/S1479409822000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ent type of virtuosity and, to borrow Dunsby’s term, it is the symbiosis of the composer and performer that determines the exact virtuosity type. The essays of this book deepen our understanding of the concept of virtuosity and of different approaches. Some essays require previous knowledge of the source described to be fully comprehended. As a collection, the book re-evaluates virtuosity, specifically its given definitions and practices, through Liszt’s own understanding in connection to his contemporaries. However, the topic of audience reception is not addressed much, and it could have enhanced further the conception of virtuosity. The question to what extent something is virtuosic when the external difficulty is not so visual has been raised in a similar vein by few authors. Could this feature be called something different? Is there more than one virtuosity? Some chapters hint, indirectly and directly, that indeed there are different conceptions of the term. One must also consider, though, that virtuosity and its definition as having a specific level of difficulty was comprehended differently not only by composers and performers but also by the audience when a work was first heard, even though today’s audiences expect technical demanding works. There was a mutual collaboration between audiences, composers and performers for the conception and definition of virtuosity.","PeriodicalId":41351,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charles Youmans, ed. Mahler in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021). 344 pp. £84.99.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Attfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1479409822000313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ent type of virtuosity and, to borrow Dunsby’s term, it is the symbiosis of the composer and performer that determines the exact virtuosity type. The essays of this book deepen our understanding of the concept of virtuosity and of different approaches. Some essays require previous knowledge of the source described to be fully comprehended. As a collection, the book re-evaluates virtuosity, specifically its given definitions and practices, through Liszt’s own understanding in connection to his contemporaries. However, the topic of audience reception is not addressed much, and it could have enhanced further the conception of virtuosity. The question to what extent something is virtuosic when the external difficulty is not so visual has been raised in a similar vein by few authors. Could this feature be called something different? Is there more than one virtuosity? Some chapters hint, indirectly and directly, that indeed there are different conceptions of the term. One must also consider, though, that virtuosity and its definition as having a specific level of difficulty was comprehended differently not only by composers and performers but also by the audience when a work was first heard, even though today’s audiences expect technical demanding works. There was a mutual collaboration between audiences, composers and performers for the conception and definition of virtuosity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nineteenth-Century Music Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nineteenth-Century Music Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409822000313\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409822000313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精湛技艺的类型,借用邓斯比的话,正是作曲家和表演者的共生关系决定了确切的精湛技艺类型。这本书的文章加深了我们对技艺概念和不同方法的理解。有些文章需要事先了解所描述的出处才能完全理解。作为一本合集,这本书通过李斯特自己对同时代人的理解,重新评估了精湛技艺,特别是其给定的定义和实践。然而,观众接受的话题并没有得到太多的讨论,它本可以进一步增强精湛技艺的概念。很少有作者以类似的方式提出了这样一个问题,即当外部困难不那么直观时,某件事在多大程度上是精湛的。这个功能可以称为不同的功能吗?技艺不止一种吗?有些章节间接和直接地暗示,这个术语确实有不同的概念。然而,人们还必须考虑到,当一部作品第一次被听到时,不仅作曲家和表演者,观众对精湛技艺及其具有特定难度的定义也有不同的理解,尽管今天的观众期待的是技术要求高的作品。在精湛技艺的概念和定义方面,观众、作曲家和表演者之间进行了相互合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Charles Youmans, ed. Mahler in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021). 344 pp. £84.99.
ent type of virtuosity and, to borrow Dunsby’s term, it is the symbiosis of the composer and performer that determines the exact virtuosity type. The essays of this book deepen our understanding of the concept of virtuosity and of different approaches. Some essays require previous knowledge of the source described to be fully comprehended. As a collection, the book re-evaluates virtuosity, specifically its given definitions and practices, through Liszt’s own understanding in connection to his contemporaries. However, the topic of audience reception is not addressed much, and it could have enhanced further the conception of virtuosity. The question to what extent something is virtuosic when the external difficulty is not so visual has been raised in a similar vein by few authors. Could this feature be called something different? Is there more than one virtuosity? Some chapters hint, indirectly and directly, that indeed there are different conceptions of the term. One must also consider, though, that virtuosity and its definition as having a specific level of difficulty was comprehended differently not only by composers and performers but also by the audience when a work was first heard, even though today’s audiences expect technical demanding works. There was a mutual collaboration between audiences, composers and performers for the conception and definition of virtuosity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信