结论

Q4 Social Sciences
Luis Simón
{"title":"结论","authors":"Luis Simón","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has endeavoured to outline and understand the present European geopolitical order and how it will likely evolve in the coming years. The analysis has revolved around the question of how the postSecond World War order is changing. In the immediate aftermath of the war, US military and economic power rescued many European states from collapse and the temptation to turn to communism. Not only did Washington’s presence in Europe assist European states economically, but politically the US was able to help socialise Germany within the West, and ensure that the then-Soviet Union was kept at bay. To institutionalise the gains that the US had made in European security, it forged a military alliance and encouraged the Europeans to move ahead with greater economic integration and interdependence. Both NATO and the EU in no small way stand as monuments to Washington’s commitment to European security, but there is a danger that these monuments may eventually transmogrify into relics. If the European order post-1945 was secured by US political support, military power and money, then US retrenchment, Russia’s resurgence across Eastern Europe, and Germany’s newfound centrality in European politics raise many important, if uncomfortable, questions. A central tenet of this analysis has been that Europe’s evolving order is defined by a seemingly inexorable tension between power and weakness. Even if the US remains the strongest ‘European’ power, a hands-off approach calls into question its ability to undergird regional order. Germany is becoming stronger, but it seems neither powerful enough to underwrite a new order, nor interested in doing so. Russia lacks the legitimacy to lead and is besieged by structural economic and demographic woes, as well as important geostrategic liabilities. Bedevilled by chronic economic crisis and politico-military conflagrations along its borders, Europe’s post-Second World War order is being tested. Geopolitical cohesion is arguably Europe’s greatest asset, but the range of crises it faces invariably calls this cohesion into question; all at a time when Russia is seeking to exploit and profit from fissures in the European order. It is true that NATO has reconfigured itself to the","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"90 1","pages":"63 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"Luis Simón\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper has endeavoured to outline and understand the present European geopolitical order and how it will likely evolve in the coming years. The analysis has revolved around the question of how the postSecond World War order is changing. In the immediate aftermath of the war, US military and economic power rescued many European states from collapse and the temptation to turn to communism. Not only did Washington’s presence in Europe assist European states economically, but politically the US was able to help socialise Germany within the West, and ensure that the then-Soviet Union was kept at bay. To institutionalise the gains that the US had made in European security, it forged a military alliance and encouraged the Europeans to move ahead with greater economic integration and interdependence. Both NATO and the EU in no small way stand as monuments to Washington’s commitment to European security, but there is a danger that these monuments may eventually transmogrify into relics. If the European order post-1945 was secured by US political support, military power and money, then US retrenchment, Russia’s resurgence across Eastern Europe, and Germany’s newfound centrality in European politics raise many important, if uncomfortable, questions. A central tenet of this analysis has been that Europe’s evolving order is defined by a seemingly inexorable tension between power and weakness. Even if the US remains the strongest ‘European’ power, a hands-off approach calls into question its ability to undergird regional order. Germany is becoming stronger, but it seems neither powerful enough to underwrite a new order, nor interested in doing so. Russia lacks the legitimacy to lead and is besieged by structural economic and demographic woes, as well as important geostrategic liabilities. Bedevilled by chronic economic crisis and politico-military conflagrations along its borders, Europe’s post-Second World War order is being tested. Geopolitical cohesion is arguably Europe’s greatest asset, but the range of crises it faces invariably calls this cohesion into question; all at a time when Russia is seeking to exploit and profit from fissures in the European order. It is true that NATO has reconfigured itself to the\",\"PeriodicalId\":37791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Whitehall Papers\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Whitehall Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2017.1427919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图概述和理解当前的欧洲地缘政治秩序,以及它在未来几年可能会如何演变。分析围绕着第二次世界大战后秩序如何变化的问题展开。二战结束后不久,美国的军事和经济实力挽救了许多欧洲国家,使其免于崩溃,避免了转向共产主义的诱惑。华盛顿在欧洲的存在不仅在经济上帮助了欧洲国家,而且在政治上,美国能够帮助德国在西方社会中社会化,并确保当时的苏联处于困境。为了将美国在欧洲安全方面取得的成果制度化,美国建立了一个军事联盟,并鼓励欧洲进一步推进经济一体化和相互依存。北约和欧盟在很大程度上都是华盛顿对欧洲安全承诺的纪念碑,但这些纪念碑有可能最终变成遗迹。如果说1945年后的欧洲秩序是由美国的政治支持、军事实力和资金保障的,那么美国的紧缩、俄罗斯在东欧的复兴以及德国在欧洲政治中重新获得的中心地位,就会引发许多重要的(尽管令人不安的)问题。这种分析的一个核心原则是,欧洲不断演变的秩序是由强国与弱国之间看似不可阻挡的紧张关系决定的。即使美国仍然是最强大的“欧洲”大国,不干涉的做法也会让人质疑美国巩固地区秩序的能力。德国正在变得更强大,但它似乎既没有强大到足以承担新秩序,也没有兴趣这样做。俄罗斯缺乏领导的合法性,而且还被结构性经济和人口问题以及重要的地缘战略责任所困扰。长期的经济危机和边境地区的政治军事冲突困扰着欧洲,二战后的秩序正在经受考验。地缘政治凝聚力可以说是欧洲最大的资产,但它面临的一系列危机总是让这种凝聚力受到质疑;这一切都发生在俄罗斯试图利用欧洲秩序的裂痕并从中获利的时候。的确,北约已经将自己重新配置为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion
This paper has endeavoured to outline and understand the present European geopolitical order and how it will likely evolve in the coming years. The analysis has revolved around the question of how the postSecond World War order is changing. In the immediate aftermath of the war, US military and economic power rescued many European states from collapse and the temptation to turn to communism. Not only did Washington’s presence in Europe assist European states economically, but politically the US was able to help socialise Germany within the West, and ensure that the then-Soviet Union was kept at bay. To institutionalise the gains that the US had made in European security, it forged a military alliance and encouraged the Europeans to move ahead with greater economic integration and interdependence. Both NATO and the EU in no small way stand as monuments to Washington’s commitment to European security, but there is a danger that these monuments may eventually transmogrify into relics. If the European order post-1945 was secured by US political support, military power and money, then US retrenchment, Russia’s resurgence across Eastern Europe, and Germany’s newfound centrality in European politics raise many important, if uncomfortable, questions. A central tenet of this analysis has been that Europe’s evolving order is defined by a seemingly inexorable tension between power and weakness. Even if the US remains the strongest ‘European’ power, a hands-off approach calls into question its ability to undergird regional order. Germany is becoming stronger, but it seems neither powerful enough to underwrite a new order, nor interested in doing so. Russia lacks the legitimacy to lead and is besieged by structural economic and demographic woes, as well as important geostrategic liabilities. Bedevilled by chronic economic crisis and politico-military conflagrations along its borders, Europe’s post-Second World War order is being tested. Geopolitical cohesion is arguably Europe’s greatest asset, but the range of crises it faces invariably calls this cohesion into question; all at a time when Russia is seeking to exploit and profit from fissures in the European order. It is true that NATO has reconfigured itself to the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信