共享空间交通的实证研究:与传统城市道路环境的比较

IF 4.3 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
{"title":"共享空间交通的实证研究:与传统城市道路环境的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared space is an unconventional concept that is not based on formal rules and standards, as it encourages road users to share the same road space with little physical or visual separation. Consequently, this concept creates intriguing research questions that have not been fully answered yet, i.e., a) can a shared space road section produce more pedestrian crossings? b) what is the relationship between pedestrian crossings and traffic speeds? and c) what are the differences with a conventional road when motorizing traffic dominates in shared space? This study examines traffic conditions in shared space by answering these research questions. More specifically, it uses Amalias Street in Nafplio Greece as a case study. This road is divided into two main sections, namely: the conventional road section and the shared space road section, allowing meaningful comparisons. The collected data are further analyzed by developing multiple linear regression models that predict pedestrian crossings and mean car speeds in both sections. This study discusses model outputs with the literature to export valid conclusions. The results show that pedestrian crossings were increased in shared space when vehicle headways were high. Shared space results in a significant drop in car speeds that is confirmed by previous studies; surprisingly, the variance of car speeds was also reduced, leading to a more homogenous driving behavior. Pedestrian crossing rate significantly influences car speeds in shared space, while this relationship was not significant in the conventional road section. Shared space seems to calm traffic speed and allow coexistence even when motorizing traffic dominates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical investigation of shared space traffic: A comparison to conventional urban road environment\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared space is an unconventional concept that is not based on formal rules and standards, as it encourages road users to share the same road space with little physical or visual separation. Consequently, this concept creates intriguing research questions that have not been fully answered yet, i.e., a) can a shared space road section produce more pedestrian crossings? b) what is the relationship between pedestrian crossings and traffic speeds? and c) what are the differences with a conventional road when motorizing traffic dominates in shared space? This study examines traffic conditions in shared space by answering these research questions. More specifically, it uses Amalias Street in Nafplio Greece as a case study. This road is divided into two main sections, namely: the conventional road section and the shared space road section, allowing meaningful comparisons. The collected data are further analyzed by developing multiple linear regression models that predict pedestrian crossings and mean car speeds in both sections. This study discusses model outputs with the literature to export valid conclusions. The results show that pedestrian crossings were increased in shared space when vehicle headways were high. Shared space results in a significant drop in car speeds that is confirmed by previous studies; surprisingly, the variance of car speeds was also reduced, leading to a more homogenous driving behavior. Pedestrian crossing rate significantly influences car speeds in shared space, while this relationship was not significant in the conventional road section. Shared space seems to calm traffic speed and allow coexistence even when motorizing traffic dominates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043023000709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043023000709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享空间是一个非常规的概念,它不以正式的规则和标准为基础,因为它鼓励道路使用者共享同一道路空间,几乎没有物理或视觉分隔。因此,这一概念产生了一些有趣的研究问题,但这些问题尚未得到充分解答,例如:a) 共享空间路段是否会产生更多的行人过街现象;b) 行人过街与车速之间的关系是什么;以及 c) 在共享空间中,机动车交通占主导地位时,与传统道路的区别是什么?本研究通过回答这些研究问题来考察共享空间的交通状况。更具体地说,它以希腊纳夫普里奥的 Amalias 街为案例进行研究。这条道路被分为两个主要路段,即:传统路段和共享空间路段,以便进行有意义的比较。通过建立多元线性回归模型,对收集到的数据进行进一步分析,预测两个路段的行人过街情况和平均车速。本研究将模型输出结果与文献进行讨论,以得出有效结论。结果表明,当车辆间隔较长时,共享空间内的行人过街人数有所增加。共享空间导致车速显著下降,这一点已被先前的研究证实;令人惊讶的是,车速的方差也减小了,从而导致驾驶行为更加单一。在共享空间中,行人过街率对车速有明显影响,而在传统路段中,这种关系并不明显。共享空间似乎能降低车速,即使在机动车占主导地位的情况下也能实现共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical investigation of shared space traffic: A comparison to conventional urban road environment
Shared space is an unconventional concept that is not based on formal rules and standards, as it encourages road users to share the same road space with little physical or visual separation. Consequently, this concept creates intriguing research questions that have not been fully answered yet, i.e., a) can a shared space road section produce more pedestrian crossings? b) what is the relationship between pedestrian crossings and traffic speeds? and c) what are the differences with a conventional road when motorizing traffic dominates in shared space? This study examines traffic conditions in shared space by answering these research questions. More specifically, it uses Amalias Street in Nafplio Greece as a case study. This road is divided into two main sections, namely: the conventional road section and the shared space road section, allowing meaningful comparisons. The collected data are further analyzed by developing multiple linear regression models that predict pedestrian crossings and mean car speeds in both sections. This study discusses model outputs with the literature to export valid conclusions. The results show that pedestrian crossings were increased in shared space when vehicle headways were high. Shared space results in a significant drop in car speeds that is confirmed by previous studies; surprisingly, the variance of car speeds was also reduced, leading to a more homogenous driving behavior. Pedestrian crossing rate significantly influences car speeds in shared space, while this relationship was not significant in the conventional road section. Shared space seems to calm traffic speed and allow coexistence even when motorizing traffic dominates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
88 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信