电刺激疗法促进慢性伤口愈合:综述

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
P. Houghton
{"title":"电刺激疗法促进慢性伤口愈合:综述","authors":"P. Houghton","doi":"10.2147/CWCMR.S101323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The overall objective of this study is to identify and appraise all of the existing clinical research literature that has evaluated the effect of electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on wound healing outcomes in adults with various types of chronic wounds. Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of four electronic databases and gray literature was carried out, and references included in related review articles were checked. Prospective and controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses that assessed the effects of EST on wound healing outcomes were described and appraised. A total PRISMA score was assigned for each included SR based on criteria included in the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool. The percentage of available research that was identified in the SR was also calculated. Results: Sixty-two clinical research studies involving 2082 patients with pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot wounds, and arterial/ischemic wounds, and ulcers of mixed etiology were located. Thirty-three of the studies with 1370 patients compared wound size reduction after EST to a control group. Eighteen reviews that used a systematic approach to identify, select, and evaluate published studies on this topic have yielded conflicting results. Poorer quality SRs with a low total PRISMA score were more likely to yield negative or inconclusive findings. Most of these low-quality SRs had very vague research questions and included less than 50% of the available literature that was known to exist. Results from 22 well-designed randomized clinical trials and 10 high-quality SRs consistently support that EST can stimulate faster wound size reduction and/or produce a greater number of closed wounds compared to a group of similar patients receiving either standard wound care or sham EST. Conclusion: Pooled results from well-conducted SRs provide strong support for the use of EST on various types of chronic wounds and pressure ulcers in particular.","PeriodicalId":43306,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Wound Care Management and Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"25-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CWCMR.S101323","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrical stimulation therapy to promote healing of chronic wounds: a review of reviews\",\"authors\":\"P. Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CWCMR.S101323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The overall objective of this study is to identify and appraise all of the existing clinical research literature that has evaluated the effect of electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on wound healing outcomes in adults with various types of chronic wounds. Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of four electronic databases and gray literature was carried out, and references included in related review articles were checked. Prospective and controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses that assessed the effects of EST on wound healing outcomes were described and appraised. A total PRISMA score was assigned for each included SR based on criteria included in the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool. The percentage of available research that was identified in the SR was also calculated. Results: Sixty-two clinical research studies involving 2082 patients with pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot wounds, and arterial/ischemic wounds, and ulcers of mixed etiology were located. Thirty-three of the studies with 1370 patients compared wound size reduction after EST to a control group. Eighteen reviews that used a systematic approach to identify, select, and evaluate published studies on this topic have yielded conflicting results. Poorer quality SRs with a low total PRISMA score were more likely to yield negative or inconclusive findings. Most of these low-quality SRs had very vague research questions and included less than 50% of the available literature that was known to exist. Results from 22 well-designed randomized clinical trials and 10 high-quality SRs consistently support that EST can stimulate faster wound size reduction and/or produce a greater number of closed wounds compared to a group of similar patients receiving either standard wound care or sham EST. Conclusion: Pooled results from well-conducted SRs provide strong support for the use of EST on various types of chronic wounds and pressure ulcers in particular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Wound Care Management and Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"25-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CWCMR.S101323\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Wound Care Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S101323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Wound Care Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S101323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

目的:本研究的总体目的是识别和评估所有现有的临床研究文献,这些文献评估了电刺激疗法(EST)对成人各种类型慢性伤口愈合结果的影响。方法:系统全面检索4个电子数据库和灰色文献,并对相关综述文章中包含的参考文献进行核对。对评估EST对伤口愈合结果影响的前瞻性和对照临床试验、系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析进行了描述和评价。根据多系统评价(AMSTAR)测量工具中包含的标准,为每个纳入的SR分配总PRISMA评分。还计算了SR中确定的可用研究的百分比。结果:62项临床研究共涉及2082例压疮、下肢静脉溃疡、糖尿病足创面、动脉/缺血性创面及混合病因溃疡患者。在1370例患者中,有33项研究将EST后伤口大小缩小与对照组进行了比较。18篇使用系统方法来识别、选择和评估已发表的关于该主题的研究的综述得出了相互矛盾的结果。质量较差且PRISMA总评分较低的SRs更有可能产生阴性或不确定的结果。大多数这些低质量的SRs有非常模糊的研究问题,包括不到50%的已知存在的可用文献。来自22个设计良好的随机临床试验和10个高质量的SRs的结果一致支持EST可以更快地刺激伤口缩小和/或产生更多的闭合伤口,相比于一组接受标准伤口护理或假EST的类似患者。结论:从执行良好的SRs中汇总的结果为EST在各种类型的慢性伤口和压疮中的应用提供了强有力的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrical stimulation therapy to promote healing of chronic wounds: a review of reviews
Purpose: The overall objective of this study is to identify and appraise all of the existing clinical research literature that has evaluated the effect of electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on wound healing outcomes in adults with various types of chronic wounds. Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of four electronic databases and gray literature was carried out, and references included in related review articles were checked. Prospective and controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses that assessed the effects of EST on wound healing outcomes were described and appraised. A total PRISMA score was assigned for each included SR based on criteria included in the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool. The percentage of available research that was identified in the SR was also calculated. Results: Sixty-two clinical research studies involving 2082 patients with pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot wounds, and arterial/ischemic wounds, and ulcers of mixed etiology were located. Thirty-three of the studies with 1370 patients compared wound size reduction after EST to a control group. Eighteen reviews that used a systematic approach to identify, select, and evaluate published studies on this topic have yielded conflicting results. Poorer quality SRs with a low total PRISMA score were more likely to yield negative or inconclusive findings. Most of these low-quality SRs had very vague research questions and included less than 50% of the available literature that was known to exist. Results from 22 well-designed randomized clinical trials and 10 high-quality SRs consistently support that EST can stimulate faster wound size reduction and/or produce a greater number of closed wounds compared to a group of similar patients receiving either standard wound care or sham EST. Conclusion: Pooled results from well-conducted SRs provide strong support for the use of EST on various types of chronic wounds and pressure ulcers in particular.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Wound Care Management and Research
Chronic Wound Care Management and Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信