{"title":"代理的不耐烦:跨期选择的自我-他者决策模型","authors":"Adelle X. Yang, Oleg Urminsky","doi":"10.1177/00222437231190851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intertemporal choices represent one of the most prevalent and fundamental tradeoffs in consumer decision-making. While prior research on intertemporal choices has focused on choices for oneself, intertemporal choices often involve one individual choosing on behalf of another. How do intertemporal choices made for another person differ from otherwise identical choices made for oneself? This research introduces a self-other decision model that distinguishes reaction utility (derived from interpersonal feedback) from vicarious utility (derived from imagining the recipient’s experience). We tested model-derived hypotheses in thirteen experiments ( N = 4,799) involving decisions between peers. Consistent with the proposed role of reaction utility in the model, we find that intertemporal choices made for others are typically more “impatient” than choices for oneself. Moreover, this “agent’s impatience” is attenuated when contextual and individual differences weaken the anticipation of interpersonal feedback. Together, our theoretical model and experimental results highlight the rewarding value of interpersonal feedback in self-other decision-making, shedding new light on interpersonal consumer choices.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: The Agent’s Impatience: A Self-Other Decision Model of Intertemporal Choices\",\"authors\":\"Adelle X. Yang, Oleg Urminsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222437231190851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intertemporal choices represent one of the most prevalent and fundamental tradeoffs in consumer decision-making. While prior research on intertemporal choices has focused on choices for oneself, intertemporal choices often involve one individual choosing on behalf of another. How do intertemporal choices made for another person differ from otherwise identical choices made for oneself? This research introduces a self-other decision model that distinguishes reaction utility (derived from interpersonal feedback) from vicarious utility (derived from imagining the recipient’s experience). We tested model-derived hypotheses in thirteen experiments ( N = 4,799) involving decisions between peers. Consistent with the proposed role of reaction utility in the model, we find that intertemporal choices made for others are typically more “impatient” than choices for oneself. Moreover, this “agent’s impatience” is attenuated when contextual and individual differences weaken the anticipation of interpersonal feedback. Together, our theoretical model and experimental results highlight the rewarding value of interpersonal feedback in self-other decision-making, shedding new light on interpersonal consumer choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231190851\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231190851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXPRESS: The Agent’s Impatience: A Self-Other Decision Model of Intertemporal Choices
Intertemporal choices represent one of the most prevalent and fundamental tradeoffs in consumer decision-making. While prior research on intertemporal choices has focused on choices for oneself, intertemporal choices often involve one individual choosing on behalf of another. How do intertemporal choices made for another person differ from otherwise identical choices made for oneself? This research introduces a self-other decision model that distinguishes reaction utility (derived from interpersonal feedback) from vicarious utility (derived from imagining the recipient’s experience). We tested model-derived hypotheses in thirteen experiments ( N = 4,799) involving decisions between peers. Consistent with the proposed role of reaction utility in the model, we find that intertemporal choices made for others are typically more “impatient” than choices for oneself. Moreover, this “agent’s impatience” is attenuated when contextual and individual differences weaken the anticipation of interpersonal feedback. Together, our theoretical model and experimental results highlight the rewarding value of interpersonal feedback in self-other decision-making, shedding new light on interpersonal consumer choices.
期刊介绍:
JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.