建设桥梁

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Stefan Laser
{"title":"建设桥梁","authors":"Stefan Laser","doi":"10.23987/sts.102808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph \"Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität\" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume \"Experimental Collaborations\") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s \"Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?\" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Bridges\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Laser\",\"doi\":\"10.23987/sts.102808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph \\\"Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität\\\" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume \\\"Experimental Collaborations\\\") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s \\\"Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?\\\" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.102808\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.102808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了最近出版的三本书,致力于对方法论的详细描述和反思。这是三种不同的贡献,关注STS方法的不同学科方法:社会学(通过Meier zu Verl的专著“Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität”[数据职业和认识论的实质性]),文化人类学(以Estalella和Criado的编辑卷“实验合作”为代表),以及在这些讨论中,跨学科的视角(由Wiedmann等人带来的“科学和技术研究”?[如何用“科学技术研究”来做研究?])。基于这些出版物,可以追踪到STS方法反射的转换。我们现在已经达到了一种令人欣慰的状态,即方法文献的目的是在方法论理想和研究现实之间建立桥梁。同时,该领域创造性地反思STS方法实践的不同效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Bridges
This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph "Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume "Experimental Collaborations") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s "Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Technology Studies
Science and Technology Studies HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信