{"title":"建设桥梁","authors":"Stefan Laser","doi":"10.23987/sts.102808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph \"Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität\" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume \"Experimental Collaborations\") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s \"Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?\" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Bridges\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Laser\",\"doi\":\"10.23987/sts.102808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph \\\"Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität\\\" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume \\\"Experimental Collaborations\\\") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s \\\"Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?\\\" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.102808\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.102808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文讨论了最近出版的三本书,致力于对方法论的详细描述和反思。这是三种不同的贡献,关注STS方法的不同学科方法:社会学(通过Meier zu Verl的专著“Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität”[数据职业和认识论的实质性]),文化人类学(以Estalella和Criado的编辑卷“实验合作”为代表),以及在这些讨论中,跨学科的视角(由Wiedmann等人带来的“科学和技术研究”?[如何用“科学技术研究”来做研究?])。基于这些出版物,可以追踪到STS方法反射的转换。我们现在已经达到了一种令人欣慰的状态,即方法文献的目的是在方法论理想和研究现实之间建立桥梁。同时,该领域创造性地反思STS方法实践的不同效果。
This paper discusses three recent book publications devoted to a detailed description and reflection of methodology. These are three different contributions that focus on different disciplinary approaches to STS methods: sociology (via Meier zu Verl's monograph "Daten-Karrieren und epistemische Materialität" [Data Careers and Epistemic Materiality]), cultural anthropology (represented by Estalella's and Criado's edited volume "Experimental Collaborations") and, across these discussions, an interdisciplinary lens (brought in by Wiedmann et al.'s "Wie forschen mit den' Science and Technology Studies'?" [How to do research with 'Science and Technology Studies'?]). Based on these publications, a transformation of STS method reflection can be traced. We have now arrived at the gratifying state that the methods literature aims to build bridges to mediate between methodological ideals on the one hand and research realities on the other. At the same time, the field creatively reflects on the diverse effects of STS method practices.