解读非洲:从欧亚技术政治到法西斯新秩序

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Andrew Denning
{"title":"解读非洲:从欧亚技术政治到法西斯新秩序","authors":"Andrew Denning","doi":"10.1086/726159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how German technocrats created revisionist plans to “unscramble” Africa in the 1930s. In particular, it studies how their schemes emerged from the transnational Eurafrican movement in the interwar period. The mixture of technical expertise and imperial ideologies in Eurafrican planning made Eurafricanism remarkably elastic in political terms, connecting liberal democratic and fascist states in the interwar era. Bureaucrats and colonial thinkers in Nazi Germany helped produce such projects, but also oriented them toward the realization of fascist imperial goals, using Eurafricanism as a tool of territorial revisionism. As a result, the technopolitics of African infrastructure development both depended on and informed the knowledge and ideology that defined fascist geopolitics. Although these blueprints never came to fruition, they point to the importance of spatial categories and technopolitical actors in the ideology and practice of National Socialism. Further, Nazi planners’ engagement with Eurafricanism indicates how interwar imperialism connected Nazi Germany to other imperial powers in Europe.","PeriodicalId":46828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unscrambling Africa: From Eurafrican Technopolitics to the Fascist New Order\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Denning\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines how German technocrats created revisionist plans to “unscramble” Africa in the 1930s. In particular, it studies how their schemes emerged from the transnational Eurafrican movement in the interwar period. The mixture of technical expertise and imperial ideologies in Eurafrican planning made Eurafricanism remarkably elastic in political terms, connecting liberal democratic and fascist states in the interwar era. Bureaucrats and colonial thinkers in Nazi Germany helped produce such projects, but also oriented them toward the realization of fascist imperial goals, using Eurafricanism as a tool of territorial revisionism. As a result, the technopolitics of African infrastructure development both depended on and informed the knowledge and ideology that defined fascist geopolitics. Although these blueprints never came to fruition, they point to the importance of spatial categories and technopolitical actors in the ideology and practice of National Socialism. Further, Nazi planners’ engagement with Eurafricanism indicates how interwar imperialism connected Nazi Germany to other imperial powers in Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了德国技术官僚如何在20世纪30年代制定修正主义计划来“解读”非洲。特别是,它研究了他们的计划是如何从两次世界大战期间的跨国欧亚运动中产生的。欧洲-非洲规划中技术专长和帝国意识形态的混合使欧洲-非洲主义在政治上具有显著的弹性,将两次世界大战时期的自由民主国家和法西斯国家联系在一起。纳粹德国的官僚和殖民思想家帮助制定了这样的项目,但也将其导向法西斯帝国目标的实现,将欧洲非洲主义作为领土修正主义的工具。因此,非洲基础设施发展的技术政治既依赖于定义法西斯地缘政治的知识和意识形态,也为其提供了信息。尽管这些蓝图从未实现,但它们指出了空间类别和技术政治行为者在国家社会主义意识形态和实践中的重要性。此外,纳粹策划者与欧洲非洲主义的接触表明,两次大战之间的帝国主义是如何将纳粹德国与欧洲其他帝国大国联系起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unscrambling Africa: From Eurafrican Technopolitics to the Fascist New Order
This article examines how German technocrats created revisionist plans to “unscramble” Africa in the 1930s. In particular, it studies how their schemes emerged from the transnational Eurafrican movement in the interwar period. The mixture of technical expertise and imperial ideologies in Eurafrican planning made Eurafricanism remarkably elastic in political terms, connecting liberal democratic and fascist states in the interwar era. Bureaucrats and colonial thinkers in Nazi Germany helped produce such projects, but also oriented them toward the realization of fascist imperial goals, using Eurafricanism as a tool of territorial revisionism. As a result, the technopolitics of African infrastructure development both depended on and informed the knowledge and ideology that defined fascist geopolitics. Although these blueprints never came to fruition, they point to the importance of spatial categories and technopolitical actors in the ideology and practice of National Socialism. Further, Nazi planners’ engagement with Eurafricanism indicates how interwar imperialism connected Nazi Germany to other imperial powers in Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Modern History is recognized as the leading American journal for the study of European intellectual, political, and cultural history. The Journal"s geographical and temporal scope-the history of Europe since the Renaissance-makes it unique: the JMH explores not only events and movements in specific countries, but also broader questions that span particular times and places.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信