前列腺切除术后失禁的手术选择:综述

A. Ryan
{"title":"前列腺切除术后失禁的手术选择:综述","authors":"A. Ryan","doi":"10.33552/AUN.2020.02.000534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Post-prostatectomy incontinence affects anywhere from 1-40% of men after a radical prostatectomy, but treatment is often delayed and surgery is underperformed.1 Currently, the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) recommends post-prostatectomy patients are offered conservative therapies including pelvic floor muscle training in the immediate post-operative period, and surgical treatment may be offered to those who have confirmed stress incontinence (SUI) and fail to respond to conservative therapies. Surgical treatment options are based on the degree of stress urinary incontinence. The artificial urinary sphincter is typically recommended for moderate to severe SUI, while the male sling can be considered in those with mild to moderate SUI.2 However, the AUS is considered a more reliable treatment, particularly for severe SUI after prostatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted using the PubMed database for recent papers between 2001 and 2020 with variations of phrases such as post-prostatectomy incontinence, treatment, AUS, male sling [1]. articles were selected for review. The AUA/SUFU guidelines for incontinence after prostate treatment were also referenced. Result: The AUS is considered the gold standard of post-prostatectomy incontinence therapy. However, male slings are gaining popularity in the treatment of mild to moderate PPI. The overall consensus is a need for prospective research based upon standardized patient workup and outcomes reporting to better compare the surgical options for PPI. Conclusion: Standardized workup and outcomes reporting would benefit the patient in determining which surgical option best treats post- prostatectomy incontinence. As of right now, there is no standardized approach apart from history and physical exam of the patient. Cystoscopy and urodynamics could be a beneficial tool in evaluation patients pre- and post-operatively. Prospective randomized control trials could then utilize a standardized approach to better compare the surgical options for PPI.","PeriodicalId":93263,"journal":{"name":"Annals of urology & nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Options for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review\",\"authors\":\"A. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/AUN.2020.02.000534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Post-prostatectomy incontinence affects anywhere from 1-40% of men after a radical prostatectomy, but treatment is often delayed and surgery is underperformed.1 Currently, the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) recommends post-prostatectomy patients are offered conservative therapies including pelvic floor muscle training in the immediate post-operative period, and surgical treatment may be offered to those who have confirmed stress incontinence (SUI) and fail to respond to conservative therapies. Surgical treatment options are based on the degree of stress urinary incontinence. The artificial urinary sphincter is typically recommended for moderate to severe SUI, while the male sling can be considered in those with mild to moderate SUI.2 However, the AUS is considered a more reliable treatment, particularly for severe SUI after prostatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted using the PubMed database for recent papers between 2001 and 2020 with variations of phrases such as post-prostatectomy incontinence, treatment, AUS, male sling [1]. articles were selected for review. The AUA/SUFU guidelines for incontinence after prostate treatment were also referenced. Result: The AUS is considered the gold standard of post-prostatectomy incontinence therapy. However, male slings are gaining popularity in the treatment of mild to moderate PPI. The overall consensus is a need for prospective research based upon standardized patient workup and outcomes reporting to better compare the surgical options for PPI. Conclusion: Standardized workup and outcomes reporting would benefit the patient in determining which surgical option best treats post- prostatectomy incontinence. As of right now, there is no standardized approach apart from history and physical exam of the patient. Cystoscopy and urodynamics could be a beneficial tool in evaluation patients pre- and post-operatively. Prospective randomized control trials could then utilize a standardized approach to better compare the surgical options for PPI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/AUN.2020.02.000534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of urology & nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/AUN.2020.02.000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:根治性前列腺切除术后,1-40%的男性会出现前列腺切除后失禁,但治疗往往延迟,手术效果不佳。1目前,美国泌尿外科协会(AUA)和泌尿动力学学会,女性盆腔医学和泌尿生殖系统重建(SUFU)建议前列腺切除术后患者接受保守治疗,包括在术后立即进行盆底肌肉训练,对于那些确诊为压力性尿失禁(SUI)且对保守治疗无效的患者,可以进行手术治疗。手术治疗的选择是基于压力性尿失禁的程度。人工尿道括约肌通常被推荐用于中度至重度SUI,而男性吊带可用于轻度至中度SUI。2然而,AUS被认为是一种更可靠的治疗方法,尤其是用于前列腺切除术后的重度SUI。方法:该研究使用PubMed数据库对2001年至2020年间的最新论文进行,其中包括前列腺切除术后失禁、治疗、AUS、男性吊带等短语的变化[1]。文章被选中进行审查。还参考了前列腺治疗后尿失禁的AUA/SUFU指南。结果:AUS被认为是前列腺切除术后失禁治疗的金标准。然而,男性吊带在治疗轻度至中度PPI方面越来越受欢迎。总体共识是需要基于标准化患者检查和结果报告的前瞻性研究,以更好地比较PPI的手术选择。结论:标准化的检查和结果报告将有利于患者确定哪种手术方案是治疗前列腺切除术后失禁的最佳选择。截至目前,除了病史和患者体检外,还没有标准化的方法。膀胱镜检查和尿动力学可能是术前和术后评估患者的有益工具。前瞻性随机对照试验可以利用标准化方法更好地比较PPI的手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Options for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review
Introduction: Post-prostatectomy incontinence affects anywhere from 1-40% of men after a radical prostatectomy, but treatment is often delayed and surgery is underperformed.1 Currently, the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) recommends post-prostatectomy patients are offered conservative therapies including pelvic floor muscle training in the immediate post-operative period, and surgical treatment may be offered to those who have confirmed stress incontinence (SUI) and fail to respond to conservative therapies. Surgical treatment options are based on the degree of stress urinary incontinence. The artificial urinary sphincter is typically recommended for moderate to severe SUI, while the male sling can be considered in those with mild to moderate SUI.2 However, the AUS is considered a more reliable treatment, particularly for severe SUI after prostatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted using the PubMed database for recent papers between 2001 and 2020 with variations of phrases such as post-prostatectomy incontinence, treatment, AUS, male sling [1]. articles were selected for review. The AUA/SUFU guidelines for incontinence after prostate treatment were also referenced. Result: The AUS is considered the gold standard of post-prostatectomy incontinence therapy. However, male slings are gaining popularity in the treatment of mild to moderate PPI. The overall consensus is a need for prospective research based upon standardized patient workup and outcomes reporting to better compare the surgical options for PPI. Conclusion: Standardized workup and outcomes reporting would benefit the patient in determining which surgical option best treats post- prostatectomy incontinence. As of right now, there is no standardized approach apart from history and physical exam of the patient. Cystoscopy and urodynamics could be a beneficial tool in evaluation patients pre- and post-operatively. Prospective randomized control trials could then utilize a standardized approach to better compare the surgical options for PPI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信