高风险情境下的多模态听力测试:性别中立与否?

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Anna von Zansen, R. Hildén, Emma Laihanen
{"title":"高风险情境下的多模态听力测试:性别中立与否?","authors":"Anna von Zansen, R. Hildén, Emma Laihanen","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2021.1993446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we used the Rasch measurement to investigate the fairness of the listening section of a national computerized high-stakes English test for differential item functioning (DIF) across gender subgroups. The computerized test format inspired us to investigate whether the items measure listening comprehension differently for females and males. Exploring the functioning of novel task types including multimodal materials such as videos and pictures was especially interesting. Firstly, the unidimensionality and local independence of the data were examined as preconditions for DIF analysis. Secondly, the authors explored the performance of female and male students through DIF analysis using the Rasch measurement. The uniform DIF analysis showed that 25 items (out of 30 items) displayed DIF and favored different gender subgroups, whereas the effect size was not meaningful. The non-uniform DIF analysis revealed several items exhibiting DIF with a moderate to large effect size, favoring various gender and ability groups. Explanations for DIF are hypothesized. Finally, implications of the study regarding test development and fairness are discussed.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":"36 1","pages":"152 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Multimodal Listening Test in a High-Stakes Context: Gender-Neutral or not?\",\"authors\":\"Anna von Zansen, R. Hildén, Emma Laihanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10904018.2021.1993446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this study, we used the Rasch measurement to investigate the fairness of the listening section of a national computerized high-stakes English test for differential item functioning (DIF) across gender subgroups. The computerized test format inspired us to investigate whether the items measure listening comprehension differently for females and males. Exploring the functioning of novel task types including multimodal materials such as videos and pictures was especially interesting. Firstly, the unidimensionality and local independence of the data were examined as preconditions for DIF analysis. Secondly, the authors explored the performance of female and male students through DIF analysis using the Rasch measurement. The uniform DIF analysis showed that 25 items (out of 30 items) displayed DIF and favored different gender subgroups, whereas the effect size was not meaningful. The non-uniform DIF analysis revealed several items exhibiting DIF with a moderate to large effect size, favoring various gender and ability groups. Explanations for DIF are hypothesized. Finally, implications of the study regarding test development and fairness are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Listening\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"152 - 170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Listening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1993446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1993446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要在本研究中,我们使用Rasch测量来调查国家计算机化高风险英语测试中不同性别亚组差异项目功能(DIF)听力部分的公平性。计算机化的测试形式激发了我们调查这些项目对女性和男性听力理解的衡量是否不同。探索包括视频和图片等多模式材料在内的新型任务类型的功能尤其有趣。首先,将数据的单维性和局部独立性作为DIF分析的先决条件。其次,作者通过使用Rasch测量的DIF分析来探究男女学生的表现。统一的DIF分析显示,25个项目(30个项目中)显示DIF,并支持不同性别的亚组,而效果大小没有意义。非均匀DIF分析显示,有几个项目表现出中等到较大的DIF效应,有利于不同性别和能力群体。对DIF的解释是假设的。最后,讨论了该研究对测试开发和公平性的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Multimodal Listening Test in a High-Stakes Context: Gender-Neutral or not?
ABSTRACT In this study, we used the Rasch measurement to investigate the fairness of the listening section of a national computerized high-stakes English test for differential item functioning (DIF) across gender subgroups. The computerized test format inspired us to investigate whether the items measure listening comprehension differently for females and males. Exploring the functioning of novel task types including multimodal materials such as videos and pictures was especially interesting. Firstly, the unidimensionality and local independence of the data were examined as preconditions for DIF analysis. Secondly, the authors explored the performance of female and male students through DIF analysis using the Rasch measurement. The uniform DIF analysis showed that 25 items (out of 30 items) displayed DIF and favored different gender subgroups, whereas the effect size was not meaningful. The non-uniform DIF analysis revealed several items exhibiting DIF with a moderate to large effect size, favoring various gender and ability groups. Explanations for DIF are hypothesized. Finally, implications of the study regarding test development and fairness are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信