{"title":"用于教育目的的合成孔径雷达的远距离和近距离测量以及两种不同信号处理算法的比较","authors":"Jonas Berg, Simon Müller, A. Diewald","doi":"10.5194/ars-19-221-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this paper two simple synthetic aperture radar (SAR) methods are applied on data from a 24 GHz FMCW radar implemented on a linear drive for educational purposes.\nThe data of near and far range measurements are evaluated using two different SAR signal processing algorithms featuring 2D-FFT and frequency back projection (FBP) method (Moreira et al., 2013).\nA comparison of these two algorithms is performed concerning runtime, image pixel size, azimuth and range resolution.\nThe far range measurements are executed in a range of 60 to 135 m by monitoring cars in a parking lot.\nThe near range measurement from 0 to 5 m are realised in a measuring chamber equipped with absorber foam and nearly ideal targets like corner reflectors.\nThe comparison of 2D-FFT and FBP algorithm shows that both deliver good and similar results for the far range measurements but the runtime of the FBP algorithm is up to 150 times longer as the 2D-FFT runtime.\nIn the near range measurements the FBP algorithm displays a very good azimuth resolution and targets which are very close to each other can be separated easily.\nIn contrast to that the 2D-FFT algorithm has a lower azimuth resolution in the near range, thus targets which are very close to each other, merge together and cannot be separated.\n","PeriodicalId":45093,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radio Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Far- and Near Range Measurements with a Synthetic Aperture Radar for Educational Purposes and Comparison of Two Different Signal Processing Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Berg, Simon Müller, A. Diewald\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/ars-19-221-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In this paper two simple synthetic aperture radar (SAR) methods are applied on data from a 24 GHz FMCW radar implemented on a linear drive for educational purposes.\\nThe data of near and far range measurements are evaluated using two different SAR signal processing algorithms featuring 2D-FFT and frequency back projection (FBP) method (Moreira et al., 2013).\\nA comparison of these two algorithms is performed concerning runtime, image pixel size, azimuth and range resolution.\\nThe far range measurements are executed in a range of 60 to 135 m by monitoring cars in a parking lot.\\nThe near range measurement from 0 to 5 m are realised in a measuring chamber equipped with absorber foam and nearly ideal targets like corner reflectors.\\nThe comparison of 2D-FFT and FBP algorithm shows that both deliver good and similar results for the far range measurements but the runtime of the FBP algorithm is up to 150 times longer as the 2D-FFT runtime.\\nIn the near range measurements the FBP algorithm displays a very good azimuth resolution and targets which are very close to each other can be separated easily.\\nIn contrast to that the 2D-FFT algorithm has a lower azimuth resolution in the near range, thus targets which are very close to each other, merge together and cannot be separated.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radio Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radio Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-19-221-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radio Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-19-221-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文将两种简单的合成孔径雷达(SAR)方法应用于24 GHz FMCW雷达在线性驱动器上实现,用于教育目的。使用两种不同的SAR信号处理算法评估近距离和远距离测量的数据,这两种算法分别采用2D-FFT和频率反投影(FBP)方法(Moreira et al.,2013)。在运行时间、图像像素大小、方位角和距离分辨率方面对这两种方法进行了比较。远程测量在60到135的范围内执行 我在停车场监视汽车。从0到5的近距离测量 m是在配备有吸收泡沫和几乎理想的目标(如角反射器)的测量室中实现的。2D-FFT和FBP算法的比较表明,两者对于远程测量都提供了良好且相似的结果,但是FBP算法运行时间是2D-FFT运行时间的150倍。在近距离测量中,FBP算法显示出非常好的方位分辨率,并且可以容易地分离彼此非常接近的目标。与此相反,2D-FFT算法在近距离内具有较低的方位分辨率,因此彼此非常接近的目标合并在一起并且不能分离。
Far- and Near Range Measurements with a Synthetic Aperture Radar for Educational Purposes and Comparison of Two Different Signal Processing Algorithms
Abstract. In this paper two simple synthetic aperture radar (SAR) methods are applied on data from a 24 GHz FMCW radar implemented on a linear drive for educational purposes.
The data of near and far range measurements are evaluated using two different SAR signal processing algorithms featuring 2D-FFT and frequency back projection (FBP) method (Moreira et al., 2013).
A comparison of these two algorithms is performed concerning runtime, image pixel size, azimuth and range resolution.
The far range measurements are executed in a range of 60 to 135 m by monitoring cars in a parking lot.
The near range measurement from 0 to 5 m are realised in a measuring chamber equipped with absorber foam and nearly ideal targets like corner reflectors.
The comparison of 2D-FFT and FBP algorithm shows that both deliver good and similar results for the far range measurements but the runtime of the FBP algorithm is up to 150 times longer as the 2D-FFT runtime.
In the near range measurements the FBP algorithm displays a very good azimuth resolution and targets which are very close to each other can be separated easily.
In contrast to that the 2D-FFT algorithm has a lower azimuth resolution in the near range, thus targets which are very close to each other, merge together and cannot be separated.