发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

无限渗流的历史透视:纠正一个普遍谬误

IF 0.4 Q3 Engineering
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI:10.1680/JENHH.19.00004
D. WesleyLaurence, PreeneMartin
{"title":"无限渗流的历史透视:纠正一个普遍谬误","authors":"D. WesleyLaurence, PreeneMartin","doi":"10.1680/JENHH.19.00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is commonly assumed in seepage studies for geotechnical problems that the phreatic surface (the line of zero pore water pressure) represents the upper flow line and is the boundary of the seepag...","PeriodicalId":42072,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/JENHH.19.00004","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A historical perspective on unconfined seepage: correcting a common fallacy\",\"authors\":\"D. WesleyLaurence, PreeneMartin\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/JENHH.19.00004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is commonly assumed in seepage studies for geotechnical problems that the phreatic surface (the line of zero pore water pressure) represents the upper flow line and is the boundary of the seepag...\",\"PeriodicalId\":42072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/JENHH.19.00004\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/JENHH.19.00004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/JENHH.19.00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在岩土工程问题的渗流研究中，通常认为潜水面(零孔隙水压力线)代表上流线，是渗流的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
A historical perspective on unconfined seepage: correcting a common fallacy
It is commonly assumed in seepage studies for geotechnical problems that the phreatic surface (the line of zero pore water pressure) represents the upper flow line and is the boundary of the seepag...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信