NoSAS评分用于睡眠呼吸障碍筛查的有效性:埃及的一项回顾性研究

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
R. Sweed, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud
{"title":"NoSAS评分用于睡眠呼吸障碍筛查的有效性:埃及的一项回顾性研究","authors":"R. Sweed, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_45_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study was carried out to validate the NoSAS score and assess its performance in predicting clinically significant sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients referred for a sleep study and to compare its performance with the recent (No-Apnea score) and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study of an existing database of consecutive outpatients who were referred for suspected SDB at the sleep lab of Chest Department in Alexandria Main University Hospital from October 2012 to December 2018. We enrolled patients of at least 18 years who completed a full-night polysomnography. We defined clinically significant SDB as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) of at least 20 events/h. We assessed the validity of the NoSAS score and compared its performance with the No-Apnea score and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Results After the exclusion of patients who did not fulfill our inclusion criteria, 362 out of 720 patients were enrolled. Only 5% were not diagnosed with SDB (AHI<5). Moderate-severe SDB was present in 82.4% of patients. Using a threshold of at least 8 at different AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30), the NoSAS score showed area under the curve (AUC) similar to the STOP-BANG Questionnaire only at AHI of at least 20 (AUC 0.77), whereas at the other AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 25, 30), the STOP-BANG Questionnaire showed higher AUC. At all AHI cut-offs, the NoSAS score was superior to the No-Apnea score. Conclusion Despite its simplicity, the NoSAS score is a valuable screening tool, especially when resources are limited.","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the NoSAS score for the screening of sleep-disordered breathing: a retrospective study in Egypt\",\"authors\":\"R. Sweed, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejb.ejb_45_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background This study was carried out to validate the NoSAS score and assess its performance in predicting clinically significant sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients referred for a sleep study and to compare its performance with the recent (No-Apnea score) and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study of an existing database of consecutive outpatients who were referred for suspected SDB at the sleep lab of Chest Department in Alexandria Main University Hospital from October 2012 to December 2018. We enrolled patients of at least 18 years who completed a full-night polysomnography. We defined clinically significant SDB as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) of at least 20 events/h. We assessed the validity of the NoSAS score and compared its performance with the No-Apnea score and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Results After the exclusion of patients who did not fulfill our inclusion criteria, 362 out of 720 patients were enrolled. Only 5% were not diagnosed with SDB (AHI<5). Moderate-severe SDB was present in 82.4% of patients. Using a threshold of at least 8 at different AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30), the NoSAS score showed area under the curve (AUC) similar to the STOP-BANG Questionnaire only at AHI of at least 20 (AUC 0.77), whereas at the other AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 25, 30), the STOP-BANG Questionnaire showed higher AUC. At all AHI cut-offs, the NoSAS score was superior to the No-Apnea score. Conclusion Despite its simplicity, the NoSAS score is a valuable screening tool, especially when resources are limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_45_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_45_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究旨在验证NoSAS评分,评估其在预测睡眠研究患者临床显著睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)方面的表现,并将其与最近的(无呼吸暂停评分)和STOP-BANG问卷进行比较。患者和方法这是对2012年10月至2018年12月在亚历山大美茵大学医院胸科睡眠实验室因疑似SDB转诊的连续门诊患者的现有数据库的回顾性研究。我们招募了至少18岁的患者,他们完成了整晚多导睡眠图检查。我们将具有临床意义的SDB定义为至少20次事件/小时的呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)。我们评估了NoSAS评分的有效性,并将其表现与无呼吸暂停评分和STOP-BANG问卷进行了比较。结果排除了不符合纳入标准的患者后,720名患者中有362人入选。只有5%未被诊断为SDB(AHI<5)。82.4%的患者存在中重度SDB。在不同的AHI截止值(5、10、15、20、25、30)使用至少8的阈值,NoSAS评分显示曲线下面积(AUC)与STOP-BANG问卷相似,仅在AHI至少为20时(AUC 0.77),而在其他AHI截止点(5、10,25、30),STOP-BANG问卷显示更高的AUC。在所有AHI截止值中,NoSAS评分均优于无呼吸暂停评分。结论尽管NoSAS评分很简单,但它是一种有价值的筛查工具,尤其是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the NoSAS score for the screening of sleep-disordered breathing: a retrospective study in Egypt
Background This study was carried out to validate the NoSAS score and assess its performance in predicting clinically significant sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients referred for a sleep study and to compare its performance with the recent (No-Apnea score) and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study of an existing database of consecutive outpatients who were referred for suspected SDB at the sleep lab of Chest Department in Alexandria Main University Hospital from October 2012 to December 2018. We enrolled patients of at least 18 years who completed a full-night polysomnography. We defined clinically significant SDB as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) of at least 20 events/h. We assessed the validity of the NoSAS score and compared its performance with the No-Apnea score and the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Results After the exclusion of patients who did not fulfill our inclusion criteria, 362 out of 720 patients were enrolled. Only 5% were not diagnosed with SDB (AHI<5). Moderate-severe SDB was present in 82.4% of patients. Using a threshold of at least 8 at different AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30), the NoSAS score showed area under the curve (AUC) similar to the STOP-BANG Questionnaire only at AHI of at least 20 (AUC 0.77), whereas at the other AHI cut-offs (5, 10, 25, 30), the STOP-BANG Questionnaire showed higher AUC. At all AHI cut-offs, the NoSAS score was superior to the No-Apnea score. Conclusion Despite its simplicity, the NoSAS score is a valuable screening tool, especially when resources are limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信