恢复(和拒绝)日常生活的笛卡尔表示:当城市的移动和网格认识论相遇

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
K. Taylor
{"title":"恢复(和拒绝)日常生活的笛卡尔表示:当城市的移动和网格认识论相遇","authors":"K. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In community planning, the consequence of a failed or productive teaching and learning interaction could mean the preservation or destruction of someone’s house, a neighborhood school, a park, all of it. This article elucidates consistencies in how people collaborate across spatial epistemologies and power imbalances for making recommendations and decisions about communities. Holding two epistemic stances in tension—mobile and grid epistemologies—the article follows the arc of a design-based research study, beginning with ethnographic observations of participatory planning meetings, the findings from which informed the design of experimental teaching cases with youth. I focus on two vibrant and consequential instances of people walking others through a storyline of their home communities that moves in and out of epistemic commensurability. Building upon findings from interaction and multi-modal analyses, I argue that consequential learning occurred when people enacted relational attunement in which new spatial imaginaries of a community came into view and were informed by both mobile and grid epistemologies. This article serves as one instance of finding, analyzing, and designing for moments where the roles of “teaching” and “learning” are under negotiation or unknown, and how people engage with one another in politically charged and tenuous interactions.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"38 1","pages":"407 - 426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resuscitating (and Refusing) Cartesian Representations of Daily Life: When Mobile and Grid Epistemologies of the City Meet\",\"authors\":\"K. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In community planning, the consequence of a failed or productive teaching and learning interaction could mean the preservation or destruction of someone’s house, a neighborhood school, a park, all of it. This article elucidates consistencies in how people collaborate across spatial epistemologies and power imbalances for making recommendations and decisions about communities. Holding two epistemic stances in tension—mobile and grid epistemologies—the article follows the arc of a design-based research study, beginning with ethnographic observations of participatory planning meetings, the findings from which informed the design of experimental teaching cases with youth. I focus on two vibrant and consequential instances of people walking others through a storyline of their home communities that moves in and out of epistemic commensurability. Building upon findings from interaction and multi-modal analyses, I argue that consequential learning occurred when people enacted relational attunement in which new spatial imaginaries of a community came into view and were informed by both mobile and grid epistemologies. This article serves as one instance of finding, analyzing, and designing for moments where the roles of “teaching” and “learning” are under negotiation or unknown, and how people engage with one another in politically charged and tenuous interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要在社区规划中,失败或富有成效的教学互动的后果可能意味着某人的房子、社区学校、公园等的保留或破坏。本文阐述了人们如何在空间认识论和权力失衡的基础上进行合作,以提出关于社区的建议和决策的一致性。本文在紧张中持有两种认识立场——移动和网格认识论——遵循基于设计的研究路线,从参与式计划会议的民族志观察开始,研究结果为青年实验教学案例的设计提供了依据。我关注的是两个充满活力和重要意义的例子,人们带着别人走过他们家乡社区的故事情节,这些故事情节在认知可公度中进进出出。基于互动和多模态分析的发现,我认为,当人们建立关系协调时,就会发生间接学习,在这种协调中,社区的新空间想象进入视野,并受到移动和网格认识论的影响。这篇文章是一个发现、分析和设计“教学”和“学习”角色处于协商或未知状态的时刻的例子,以及人们如何在充满政治色彩和脆弱的互动中相互参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resuscitating (and Refusing) Cartesian Representations of Daily Life: When Mobile and Grid Epistemologies of the City Meet
Abstract In community planning, the consequence of a failed or productive teaching and learning interaction could mean the preservation or destruction of someone’s house, a neighborhood school, a park, all of it. This article elucidates consistencies in how people collaborate across spatial epistemologies and power imbalances for making recommendations and decisions about communities. Holding two epistemic stances in tension—mobile and grid epistemologies—the article follows the arc of a design-based research study, beginning with ethnographic observations of participatory planning meetings, the findings from which informed the design of experimental teaching cases with youth. I focus on two vibrant and consequential instances of people walking others through a storyline of their home communities that moves in and out of epistemic commensurability. Building upon findings from interaction and multi-modal analyses, I argue that consequential learning occurred when people enacted relational attunement in which new spatial imaginaries of a community came into view and were informed by both mobile and grid epistemologies. This article serves as one instance of finding, analyzing, and designing for moments where the roles of “teaching” and “learning” are under negotiation or unknown, and how people engage with one another in politically charged and tenuous interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信