深度学习与解释权:对合法性和正当法律程序的技术挑战

Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier
{"title":"深度学习与解释权:对合法性和正当法律程序的技术挑战","authors":"Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier","doi":"10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2022.v32i12.7547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESUMO: This article studies the right to explainability, which is extremely important in times of fast technological evolution and use of deep learning for the most varied decision-making procedures based on personal data. Its main hypothesis is that the right to explanation is totally linked to the due process of Law and legality, being a safeguard for those who need to contest automatic decisions taken by algorithms, whether in judicial contexts, in general Public Administration contexts","PeriodicalId":30997,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Direito Brasileira","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEEP LEARNING AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLANATION: TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES TO LEGALITY AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW\",\"authors\":\"Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier\",\"doi\":\"10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2022.v32i12.7547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RESUMO: This article studies the right to explainability, which is extremely important in times of fast technological evolution and use of deep learning for the most varied decision-making procedures based on personal data. Its main hypothesis is that the right to explanation is totally linked to the due process of Law and legality, being a safeguard for those who need to contest automatic decisions taken by algorithms, whether in judicial contexts, in general Public Administration contexts\",\"PeriodicalId\":30997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Direito Brasileira\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Direito Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2022.v32i12.7547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Direito Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2022.v32i12.7547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

RESUMO:本文研究了可解释性的权利,这在技术快速发展和基于个人数据的各种决策程序中使用深度学习的时代是极其重要的。其主要假设是,解释权与正当法律程序和合法性完全相关,是那些需要对算法做出的自动决定提出质疑的人的保障,无论是在司法背景下还是在一般公共行政背景下
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEEP LEARNING AND THE RIGHT TO EXPLANATION: TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES TO LEGALITY AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW
RESUMO: This article studies the right to explainability, which is extremely important in times of fast technological evolution and use of deep learning for the most varied decision-making procedures based on personal data. Its main hypothesis is that the right to explanation is totally linked to the due process of Law and legality, being a safeguard for those who need to contest automatic decisions taken by algorithms, whether in judicial contexts, in general Public Administration contexts
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信