预测二维应力系统中的屈服面:一个学生的实验室实验

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
M. Muscat, P. Mollicone
{"title":"预测二维应力系统中的屈服面:一个学生的实验室实验","authors":"M. Muscat, P. Mollicone","doi":"10.1177/03064190231169251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with the determination of the yield surface in a two-dimensional stress field within an undergraduate Mechanics of Materials student laboratory experiment. In this experiment, the two-dimensional stress field is obtained by subjecting a steel specimen to a combined bending and torsion load. The motivation for the paper was the lack of correlation between the von Mises and Tresca yield criteria and the principal stresses calculated at the load at which students were predicting material yielding. The latter yield loci were based on the uniaxial 0.2% proof stress. The lack of correlation was creating a lot of frustration amongst students. This is undesirable, especially within an undergraduate student experiment. Two hypotheses for the lack of agreement were considered. The first hypothesis was the uncertainty involved in the method that the students were using to predict the onset of material yielding. The second hypothesis was that the specimens being used for the experiment had anisotropic properties, given that little information on their manufacture was provided. The need for determining accurate yield stress values and on methodologies found in literature that are used to determine the material proof stress or lower yield stress in a uniaxial tensile test are discussed. Four methods taken from literature are used and adapted to detect the first yield of the specimen under a combined bending and torsional load. The resulting experimentally yield loci are compared with the theoretical von Mises and Tresca isotropic yield loci over half of the second quadrant of the two-dimensional principal stress field plot. Correlation between the four methods was quite good but not so when compared with the von Mises and Tresca’ loci. A lack of correlation occurred for an increasing torsional load indicating a possible anisotropy in the material properties. These results hinted towards the second hypothesis. A number of tensile test specimens were hence heat treated so as to induce isotropy in the material properties. The combined loading experiments were repeated using the heat-treated samples. A very good correlation was obtained between the experimental yield points for the two-dimensional stress field and the von Mises and Tresca yield loci. This good correlation for the heat-treated specimens confirmed the authors’ second hypothesis on the anisotropic properties in the as-received state and, therefore, the requirement to heat treat the specimens for a meaningful student undergraduate laboratory activity.","PeriodicalId":39952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the yield surface in a two-dimensional stress system: A student's laboratory experiment\",\"authors\":\"M. Muscat, P. Mollicone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03064190231169251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is concerned with the determination of the yield surface in a two-dimensional stress field within an undergraduate Mechanics of Materials student laboratory experiment. In this experiment, the two-dimensional stress field is obtained by subjecting a steel specimen to a combined bending and torsion load. The motivation for the paper was the lack of correlation between the von Mises and Tresca yield criteria and the principal stresses calculated at the load at which students were predicting material yielding. The latter yield loci were based on the uniaxial 0.2% proof stress. The lack of correlation was creating a lot of frustration amongst students. This is undesirable, especially within an undergraduate student experiment. Two hypotheses for the lack of agreement were considered. The first hypothesis was the uncertainty involved in the method that the students were using to predict the onset of material yielding. The second hypothesis was that the specimens being used for the experiment had anisotropic properties, given that little information on their manufacture was provided. The need for determining accurate yield stress values and on methodologies found in literature that are used to determine the material proof stress or lower yield stress in a uniaxial tensile test are discussed. Four methods taken from literature are used and adapted to detect the first yield of the specimen under a combined bending and torsional load. The resulting experimentally yield loci are compared with the theoretical von Mises and Tresca isotropic yield loci over half of the second quadrant of the two-dimensional principal stress field plot. Correlation between the four methods was quite good but not so when compared with the von Mises and Tresca’ loci. A lack of correlation occurred for an increasing torsional load indicating a possible anisotropy in the material properties. These results hinted towards the second hypothesis. A number of tensile test specimens were hence heat treated so as to induce isotropy in the material properties. The combined loading experiments were repeated using the heat-treated samples. A very good correlation was obtained between the experimental yield points for the two-dimensional stress field and the von Mises and Tresca yield loci. This good correlation for the heat-treated specimens confirmed the authors’ second hypothesis on the anisotropic properties in the as-received state and, therefore, the requirement to heat treat the specimens for a meaningful student undergraduate laboratory activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231169251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231169251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了材料力学专业本科生实验中二维应力场中屈服面的确定问题。在本实验中,通过对钢试件进行弯曲和扭转联合载荷,得到了二维应力场。这篇论文的动机是von Mises和Tresca屈服标准与学生预测材料屈服时所计算的主应力之间缺乏相关性。后者的屈服位点以单轴0.2%抗应力为基础。缺乏相关性在学生中造成了很多挫败感。这是不可取的,尤其是在本科生实验中。对缺乏共识的两种假设进行了考虑。第一个假设是学生们用来预测材料屈服开始的方法中的不确定性。第二个假设是,用于实验的标本具有各向异性,因为它们的制造信息很少。讨论了确定准确屈服应力值的需要,以及文献中用于确定单轴拉伸试验中材料证明应力或较低屈服应力的方法。从文献中采取的四种方法被用于并适应于检测在弯曲和扭转载荷联合作用下试件的首次屈服。所得的实验屈服轨迹与理论von Mises和Tresca各向同性屈服轨迹在二维主应力场图第二象限的一半以上进行了比较。四种方法的相关性较好,但与von Mises和Tresca基因座的相关性不强。当扭转载荷增加时,缺乏相关性,表明材料性能可能存在各向异性。这些结果暗示了第二个假设。因此,对许多拉伸试样进行热处理,以诱导材料性能的各向同性。采用热处理后的试样重复进行复合加载实验。二维应力场的实验屈服点与von Mises和Tresca屈服点之间有很好的相关性。热处理试样的这种良好相关性证实了作者的第二个假设,即在接收状态下的各向异性特性,因此,需要对试样进行热处理,以进行有意义的本科生实验活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting the yield surface in a two-dimensional stress system: A student's laboratory experiment
This paper is concerned with the determination of the yield surface in a two-dimensional stress field within an undergraduate Mechanics of Materials student laboratory experiment. In this experiment, the two-dimensional stress field is obtained by subjecting a steel specimen to a combined bending and torsion load. The motivation for the paper was the lack of correlation between the von Mises and Tresca yield criteria and the principal stresses calculated at the load at which students were predicting material yielding. The latter yield loci were based on the uniaxial 0.2% proof stress. The lack of correlation was creating a lot of frustration amongst students. This is undesirable, especially within an undergraduate student experiment. Two hypotheses for the lack of agreement were considered. The first hypothesis was the uncertainty involved in the method that the students were using to predict the onset of material yielding. The second hypothesis was that the specimens being used for the experiment had anisotropic properties, given that little information on their manufacture was provided. The need for determining accurate yield stress values and on methodologies found in literature that are used to determine the material proof stress or lower yield stress in a uniaxial tensile test are discussed. Four methods taken from literature are used and adapted to detect the first yield of the specimen under a combined bending and torsional load. The resulting experimentally yield loci are compared with the theoretical von Mises and Tresca isotropic yield loci over half of the second quadrant of the two-dimensional principal stress field plot. Correlation between the four methods was quite good but not so when compared with the von Mises and Tresca’ loci. A lack of correlation occurred for an increasing torsional load indicating a possible anisotropy in the material properties. These results hinted towards the second hypothesis. A number of tensile test specimens were hence heat treated so as to induce isotropy in the material properties. The combined loading experiments were repeated using the heat-treated samples. A very good correlation was obtained between the experimental yield points for the two-dimensional stress field and the von Mises and Tresca yield loci. This good correlation for the heat-treated specimens confirmed the authors’ second hypothesis on the anisotropic properties in the as-received state and, therefore, the requirement to heat treat the specimens for a meaningful student undergraduate laboratory activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education is aimed at teachers and trainers of mechanical engineering students in higher education and focuses on the discussion of the principles and practices of training professional, technical and mechanical engineers and those in related fields. It encourages articles about new experimental methods, and laboratory techniques, and includes book reviews and highlights of recent articles in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信