{"title":"元分析雨云图:一种可视化交换所数据的新方法","authors":"Kaitlyn G. Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Tipton","doi":"10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the body of scientific evidence about effective policies and practices grows, so does the need to effectively communicate that evidence to policy-makers and practitioners. Clearinghouses have emerged to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making process for education practitioners. While the results and methods for developing and analyzing the data in clearinghouses are based upon rigorous and scientific study, there has been little rigor or empirical effort to determine effective ways of presenting that evidence to practitioners. In this paper, we present a new visualization for clearinghouse data, called a Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud (MARC) Plot, designed based on evidence from the data visualization and statistical cognition literatures. We evaluate the efficacy of this visualization in a statistical cognition experiment and find that compared to three other visualizations used in practice, the MARC Plot is more effective in helping participants correctly interpret evidence (0.76, 0.43, and 0.43 standard deviation improvements respectively; each p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies providing evidence regarding how to best present the type of information found in clearinghouses.","PeriodicalId":47260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","volume":"15 1","pages":"848 - 875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud Plot: A New Approach to Visualizing Clearinghouse Data\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn G. Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Tipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As the body of scientific evidence about effective policies and practices grows, so does the need to effectively communicate that evidence to policy-makers and practitioners. Clearinghouses have emerged to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making process for education practitioners. While the results and methods for developing and analyzing the data in clearinghouses are based upon rigorous and scientific study, there has been little rigor or empirical effort to determine effective ways of presenting that evidence to practitioners. In this paper, we present a new visualization for clearinghouse data, called a Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud (MARC) Plot, designed based on evidence from the data visualization and statistical cognition literatures. We evaluate the efficacy of this visualization in a statistical cognition experiment and find that compared to three other visualizations used in practice, the MARC Plot is more effective in helping participants correctly interpret evidence (0.76, 0.43, and 0.43 standard deviation improvements respectively; each p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies providing evidence regarding how to best present the type of information found in clearinghouses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"848 - 875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud Plot: A New Approach to Visualizing Clearinghouse Data
Abstract As the body of scientific evidence about effective policies and practices grows, so does the need to effectively communicate that evidence to policy-makers and practitioners. Clearinghouses have emerged to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making process for education practitioners. While the results and methods for developing and analyzing the data in clearinghouses are based upon rigorous and scientific study, there has been little rigor or empirical effort to determine effective ways of presenting that evidence to practitioners. In this paper, we present a new visualization for clearinghouse data, called a Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud (MARC) Plot, designed based on evidence from the data visualization and statistical cognition literatures. We evaluate the efficacy of this visualization in a statistical cognition experiment and find that compared to three other visualizations used in practice, the MARC Plot is more effective in helping participants correctly interpret evidence (0.76, 0.43, and 0.43 standard deviation improvements respectively; each p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies providing evidence regarding how to best present the type of information found in clearinghouses.
期刊介绍:
As the flagship publication for the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (JREE) publishes original articles from the multidisciplinary community of researchers who are committed to applying principles of scientific inquiry to the study of educational problems. Articles published in JREE should advance our knowledge of factors important for educational success and/or improve our ability to conduct further disciplined studies of pressing educational problems. JREE welcomes manuscripts that fit into one of the following categories: (1) intervention, evaluation, and policy studies; (2) theory, contexts, and mechanisms; and (3) methodological studies. The first category includes studies that focus on process and implementation and seek to demonstrate causal claims in educational research. The second category includes meta-analyses and syntheses, descriptive studies that illuminate educational conditions and contexts, and studies that rigorously investigate education processes and mechanism. The third category includes studies that advance our understanding of theoretical and technical features of measurement and research design and describe advances in data analysis and data modeling. To establish a stronger connection between scientific evidence and educational practice, studies submitted to JREE should focus on pressing problems found in classrooms and schools. Studies that help advance our understanding and demonstrate effectiveness related to challenges in reading, mathematics education, and science education are especially welcome as are studies related to cognitive functions, social processes, organizational factors, and cultural features that mediate and/or moderate critical educational outcomes. On occasion, invited responses to JREE articles and rejoinders to those responses will be included in an issue.