教育研究——公共责任,私人资助?

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Rasmussen
{"title":"教育研究——公共责任,私人资助?","authors":"P. Rasmussen","doi":"10.1080/20020317.2021.2018786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Like other Nordic countries, Denmark is a mixed-economy welfare society, where capitalist production and market logics coexist with public policy having social cohesion and equality as important priorities. Educational and pedagogical research, which is a main knowledge base for policy and practice in schools and the education system, is also seen as a field of public responsibility, carried out mainly in universities and other public research institutes. In recent years, however, a number of private actors have engaged in funding research related to education and learning. The actors include private organizations doing research in connection with product development and privately established foundations initiating research and development projects. The interplay between public and private funding and management can promote quality research combining new general knowledge with societal relevance; but it can also lead to narrow criteria for topics and methods, unsettling important balances in the field of educational research. The article examines and discusses these developments, especially the role of private foundations, as well as the conditions for fruitful interaction between the public sector and private actors in educational research.","PeriodicalId":52346,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"65 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational research – public responsibility, private funding?\",\"authors\":\"P. Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20020317.2021.2018786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Like other Nordic countries, Denmark is a mixed-economy welfare society, where capitalist production and market logics coexist with public policy having social cohesion and equality as important priorities. Educational and pedagogical research, which is a main knowledge base for policy and practice in schools and the education system, is also seen as a field of public responsibility, carried out mainly in universities and other public research institutes. In recent years, however, a number of private actors have engaged in funding research related to education and learning. The actors include private organizations doing research in connection with product development and privately established foundations initiating research and development projects. The interplay between public and private funding and management can promote quality research combining new general knowledge with societal relevance; but it can also lead to narrow criteria for topics and methods, unsettling important balances in the field of educational research. The article examines and discusses these developments, especially the role of private foundations, as well as the conditions for fruitful interaction between the public sector and private actors in educational research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.2018786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.2018786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与其他北欧国家一样,丹麦是一个混合经济的福利社会,资本主义生产和市场逻辑与以社会凝聚力和平等为重要优先事项的公共政策并存。教育和教学研究是学校和教育系统政策和实践的主要知识基础,也被视为公共责任领域,主要在大学和其他公共研究机构进行。然而,近年来,一些私人行为者参与资助与教育和学习有关的研究。行动者包括从事与产品发展有关的研究的私人组织和发起研究和发展项目的私人成立的基金会。公共和私人资金和管理之间的相互作用可以促进将新的一般知识与社会相关性相结合的高质量研究;但它也可能导致主题和方法的标准狭窄,扰乱教育研究领域的重要平衡。本文考察和讨论了这些发展,特别是私人基金会的作用,以及公共部门和私人参与者在教育研究中富有成效的互动的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational research – public responsibility, private funding?
ABSTRACT Like other Nordic countries, Denmark is a mixed-economy welfare society, where capitalist production and market logics coexist with public policy having social cohesion and equality as important priorities. Educational and pedagogical research, which is a main knowledge base for policy and practice in schools and the education system, is also seen as a field of public responsibility, carried out mainly in universities and other public research institutes. In recent years, however, a number of private actors have engaged in funding research related to education and learning. The actors include private organizations doing research in connection with product development and privately established foundations initiating research and development projects. The interplay between public and private funding and management can promote quality research combining new general knowledge with societal relevance; but it can also lead to narrow criteria for topics and methods, unsettling important balances in the field of educational research. The article examines and discusses these developments, especially the role of private foundations, as well as the conditions for fruitful interaction between the public sector and private actors in educational research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信