用于南非职业保健的简短心理健康量表的临床验证

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
C. Wijk, Jarred H. Martin, David J. F. Maree
{"title":"用于南非职业保健的简短心理健康量表的临床验证","authors":"C. Wijk, Jarred H. Martin, David J. F. Maree","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for the use of psychologically orientated screening measures in South African workplaces (Employment Equity Act, 1998). The combined set of brief mental health scales, as described under Methods, has not yet been validated for use in a South African occupational health surveillance context. Orientation: South Africa carries a high burden of mental ill-health. Screening to identify individuals for further referral is emerging as one pathway to promote access to mental health interventions. Existing occupational health surveillance infrastructure may be a useful mechanism for clinical mental health screening. Research purpose: This study explored the clinical validity of a range of brief mental health measures in the context of occupational health surveillance. Motivation for the study: To meaningfully screen for mental health as part of occupational health surveillance, tools are required that are empirically validated, clinically useful, locally available and practical to administer. Research approach/design and method: Workers ( n = 1816), recruited through workplace occupational health surveillance programmes, completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Brief Symptom Inventory 18-somatisation subscale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale-7, Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen, Intense (panic-like) anxiety scale and CAGE scale and partook in a diagnostic interview with a clinical psychologist. Main findings: Basic psychometric characteristics were reported, including confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance, internal consistencies and socio-demographic effects. Clinical utility was explored through receiver operating/operator characteristics curve analyses, and calculations of positive and negative predictive values, as well as sensitivity and specificity. These indicators provided evidence of clinical validity in the study context. Practical/managerial implications: The findings support the use of psychological screening as a brief, practicable and easily accessible mode of occupational mental health support. Contribution/value-add: This article presented evidence of structural and criterion validity for these scales and described their clinical application for practical use in occupational mental health surveillance.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of brief mental health scales for use in South African occupational healthcare\",\"authors\":\"C. Wijk, Jarred H. Martin, David J. F. Maree\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"for the use of psychologically orientated screening measures in South African workplaces (Employment Equity Act, 1998). The combined set of brief mental health scales, as described under Methods, has not yet been validated for use in a South African occupational health surveillance context. Orientation: South Africa carries a high burden of mental ill-health. Screening to identify individuals for further referral is emerging as one pathway to promote access to mental health interventions. Existing occupational health surveillance infrastructure may be a useful mechanism for clinical mental health screening. Research purpose: This study explored the clinical validity of a range of brief mental health measures in the context of occupational health surveillance. Motivation for the study: To meaningfully screen for mental health as part of occupational health surveillance, tools are required that are empirically validated, clinically useful, locally available and practical to administer. Research approach/design and method: Workers ( n = 1816), recruited through workplace occupational health surveillance programmes, completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Brief Symptom Inventory 18-somatisation subscale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale-7, Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen, Intense (panic-like) anxiety scale and CAGE scale and partook in a diagnostic interview with a clinical psychologist. Main findings: Basic psychometric characteristics were reported, including confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance, internal consistencies and socio-demographic effects. Clinical utility was explored through receiver operating/operator characteristics curve analyses, and calculations of positive and negative predictive values, as well as sensitivity and specificity. These indicators provided evidence of clinical validity in the study context. Practical/managerial implications: The findings support the use of psychological screening as a brief, practicable and easily accessible mode of occupational mental health support. Contribution/value-add: This article presented evidence of structural and criterion validity for these scales and described their clinical application for practical use in occupational mental health surveillance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在南非工作场所使用面向心理的筛选措施(《就业平等法》,1998年)。如方法中所述,综合的一套简短心理健康量表尚未在南非职业健康监测背景下得到验证。定位:南非精神疾病负担沉重。筛查以确定需要进一步转诊的个人正在成为促进获得精神卫生干预措施的一种途径。现有的职业健康监测基础设施可能是临床心理健康筛查的有用机制。研究目的:本研究探讨职业健康监测背景下一系列简短心理健康测量的临床效度。研究动机:为了有意义地筛查心理健康,作为职业健康监测的一部分,需要经验验证的、临床有用的、当地可用的和实际管理的工具。研究方法/设计和方法:通过工作场所职业健康监测项目招募的工人(n = 1816),完成了患者健康问卷-9、简要症状量表18-躯体化子量表、广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7、初级保健创伤后应激障碍筛查、强烈(恐慌样)焦虑量表和CAGE量表,并与临床心理学家进行了诊断性访谈。主要发现:报告了基本的心理测量特征,包括验证性因素分析、测量不变性、内部一致性和社会人口统计学效应。通过受试者操作/操作者特征曲线分析,计算阳性和阴性预测值,以及敏感性和特异性,探讨临床应用。这些指标在研究背景下提供了临床有效性的证据。实际/管理意义:研究结果支持将心理筛查作为一种简短、可行和易于获得的职业心理健康支持模式。贡献/增值:本文提出了这些量表的结构和标准效度的证据,并描述了它们在职业心理健康监测中的临床实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical validation of brief mental health scales for use in South African occupational healthcare
for the use of psychologically orientated screening measures in South African workplaces (Employment Equity Act, 1998). The combined set of brief mental health scales, as described under Methods, has not yet been validated for use in a South African occupational health surveillance context. Orientation: South Africa carries a high burden of mental ill-health. Screening to identify individuals for further referral is emerging as one pathway to promote access to mental health interventions. Existing occupational health surveillance infrastructure may be a useful mechanism for clinical mental health screening. Research purpose: This study explored the clinical validity of a range of brief mental health measures in the context of occupational health surveillance. Motivation for the study: To meaningfully screen for mental health as part of occupational health surveillance, tools are required that are empirically validated, clinically useful, locally available and practical to administer. Research approach/design and method: Workers ( n = 1816), recruited through workplace occupational health surveillance programmes, completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Brief Symptom Inventory 18-somatisation subscale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale-7, Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen, Intense (panic-like) anxiety scale and CAGE scale and partook in a diagnostic interview with a clinical psychologist. Main findings: Basic psychometric characteristics were reported, including confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance, internal consistencies and socio-demographic effects. Clinical utility was explored through receiver operating/operator characteristics curve analyses, and calculations of positive and negative predictive values, as well as sensitivity and specificity. These indicators provided evidence of clinical validity in the study context. Practical/managerial implications: The findings support the use of psychological screening as a brief, practicable and easily accessible mode of occupational mental health support. Contribution/value-add: This article presented evidence of structural and criterion validity for these scales and described their clinical application for practical use in occupational mental health surveillance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信