Dupilumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

Journal of Rhinology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.18787/jr.2023.00029
Jiyeon Kim, Do Hyun Kim, Se Hwan Hwang
{"title":"Dupilumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Jiyeon Kim, Do Hyun Kim, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.18787/jr.2023.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Evidence bearing on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has recently been presented by researchers from various institutions. Therefore, we compared the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment to those of endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched independently by two authors from the dates of their inception to December 2022. We retrieved the clinical results of CRSwNP patients after dupilumab administration, including changes in patient symptoms and the effects on the quality of life, and compared the results of dupilumab (treatment group) to those of endoscopic sinus surgery (control group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight articles (1,251 patients) were ultimately included. Dupilumab significantly improved nasal symptoms (nasal congestion) (mean difference [MD], -1.4433; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.7233 to -1.1632; I<sup>2</sup>=94.2%), the visual analog sinusitis score (MD, -5.0506; 95% CI, -5.4744 to -4.6267; I<sup>2</sup>=84.0%), olfactory function (standardized MD, 1.2691; 95% CI, 1.1549 to 1.3833; I<sup>2</sup>=18.4%), the quality of life (SNOT-22 score) (MD, -34.4941; 95% CI, -39.4187 to -29.5695; I<sup>2</sup>=90.8%), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (MD, -7.2713; 95% CI, -8.9442 to -5.5984; I<sup>2</sup>=87.7%), and the nasal polyp score (MD, -3.1021; 95% CI, -3.7066 to -2.4977; I<sup>2</sup>=95.6%) at about 12 months after treatment compared to the pretreatment values. Compared to endoscopic sinus surgery, dupilumab similarly improved olfactory function (MD, 1.9849; 95% CI, -1.6190 to 5.5888; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%) but was less effective in terms of reducing the SNOT-22 score (MD, 3.8472; 95% CI, 1.9872 to 5.7073; I<sup>2</sup>=96.7%) and reducing nasal congestion (MD, 0.6519; 95% CI, 0.5619 to 0.7420; I<sup>2</sup>=97.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dupilumab reduced subjective symptom scores and improved the quality of life and objective measures of progression compared to the preoperative values.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"62-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Dupilumab Treatment to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiyeon Kim, Do Hyun Kim, Se Hwan Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.18787/jr.2023.00029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Evidence bearing on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has recently been presented by researchers from various institutions. Therefore, we compared the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment to those of endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched independently by two authors from the dates of their inception to December 2022. We retrieved the clinical results of CRSwNP patients after dupilumab administration, including changes in patient symptoms and the effects on the quality of life, and compared the results of dupilumab (treatment group) to those of endoscopic sinus surgery (control group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight articles (1,251 patients) were ultimately included. Dupilumab significantly improved nasal symptoms (nasal congestion) (mean difference [MD], -1.4433; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.7233 to -1.1632; I<sup>2</sup>=94.2%), the visual analog sinusitis score (MD, -5.0506; 95% CI, -5.4744 to -4.6267; I<sup>2</sup>=84.0%), olfactory function (standardized MD, 1.2691; 95% CI, 1.1549 to 1.3833; I<sup>2</sup>=18.4%), the quality of life (SNOT-22 score) (MD, -34.4941; 95% CI, -39.4187 to -29.5695; I<sup>2</sup>=90.8%), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (MD, -7.2713; 95% CI, -8.9442 to -5.5984; I<sup>2</sup>=87.7%), and the nasal polyp score (MD, -3.1021; 95% CI, -3.7066 to -2.4977; I<sup>2</sup>=95.6%) at about 12 months after treatment compared to the pretreatment values. Compared to endoscopic sinus surgery, dupilumab similarly improved olfactory function (MD, 1.9849; 95% CI, -1.6190 to 5.5888; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%) but was less effective in terms of reducing the SNOT-22 score (MD, 3.8472; 95% CI, 1.9872 to 5.7073; I<sup>2</sup>=96.7%) and reducing nasal congestion (MD, 0.6519; 95% CI, 0.5619 to 0.7420; I<sup>2</sup>=97.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dupilumab reduced subjective symptom scores and improved the quality of life and objective measures of progression compared to the preoperative values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"62-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2023.00029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2023.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:来自不同机构的研究人员最近提出了有关dupilumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的安全性和有效性的证据。因此,我们比较了dupilumab治疗与内镜鼻窦手术的安全性和有效性。方法:从PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库建立之日起至2022年12月,由两位作者独立检索。我们检索了dupilumab给药后CRSwNP患者的临床结果,包括患者症状的变化和对生活质量的影响,并将dupilumab(治疗组)与内镜鼻窦手术(对照组)的结果进行了比较。结果:最终纳入8篇文章(1251例患者)。Dupilumab显著改善鼻部症状(鼻塞)(平均差值[MD], -1.4433;95%置信区间[CI], -1.7233 ~ -1.1632;I2=94.2%),视觉模拟鼻窦炎评分(MD, -5.0506;95% CI, -5.4744 ~ -4.6267;I2=84.0%),嗅觉功能(标准化MD, 1.2691;95% CI, 1.1549 ~ 1.3833;I2=18.4%)、生活质量(SNOT-22评分)(MD, -34.4941;95% CI, -39.4187 ~ -29.5695;I2=90.8%), Lund-Mackay计算机断层扫描评分(MD, -7.2713;95% CI, -8.9442 ~ -5.5984;I2=87.7%),鼻息肉评分(MD, -3.1021;95% CI, -3.7066 ~ -2.4977;I2=95.6%),治疗后约12个月与预处理值比较。与内窥镜鼻窦手术相比,dupilumab同样改善了嗅觉功能(MD, 1.9849;95% CI, -1.6190 ~ 5.5888;I2=0.0%),但在降低SNOT-22评分方面效果较差(MD, 3.8472;95% CI, 1.9872 ~ 5.7073;I2=96.7%)和减少鼻塞(MD, 0.6519;95% CI, 0.5619 ~ 0.7420;I2 = 97.7%)。结论:与术前相比,Dupilumab降低了主观症状评分,改善了生活质量和客观进展指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Dupilumab Treatment to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and objectives: Evidence bearing on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has recently been presented by researchers from various institutions. Therefore, we compared the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment to those of endoscopic sinus surgery.

Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched independently by two authors from the dates of their inception to December 2022. We retrieved the clinical results of CRSwNP patients after dupilumab administration, including changes in patient symptoms and the effects on the quality of life, and compared the results of dupilumab (treatment group) to those of endoscopic sinus surgery (control group).

Results: Eight articles (1,251 patients) were ultimately included. Dupilumab significantly improved nasal symptoms (nasal congestion) (mean difference [MD], -1.4433; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.7233 to -1.1632; I2=94.2%), the visual analog sinusitis score (MD, -5.0506; 95% CI, -5.4744 to -4.6267; I2=84.0%), olfactory function (standardized MD, 1.2691; 95% CI, 1.1549 to 1.3833; I2=18.4%), the quality of life (SNOT-22 score) (MD, -34.4941; 95% CI, -39.4187 to -29.5695; I2=90.8%), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (MD, -7.2713; 95% CI, -8.9442 to -5.5984; I2=87.7%), and the nasal polyp score (MD, -3.1021; 95% CI, -3.7066 to -2.4977; I2=95.6%) at about 12 months after treatment compared to the pretreatment values. Compared to endoscopic sinus surgery, dupilumab similarly improved olfactory function (MD, 1.9849; 95% CI, -1.6190 to 5.5888; I2=0.0%) but was less effective in terms of reducing the SNOT-22 score (MD, 3.8472; 95% CI, 1.9872 to 5.7073; I2=96.7%) and reducing nasal congestion (MD, 0.6519; 95% CI, 0.5619 to 0.7420; I2=97.7%).

Conclusion: Dupilumab reduced subjective symptom scores and improved the quality of life and objective measures of progression compared to the preoperative values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信