使用关键差异度量的贝叶斯人-拟合分析新方法

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Adam Combs
{"title":"使用关键差异度量的贝叶斯人-拟合分析新方法","authors":"Adam Combs","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular <math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mo>∗</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM <i>T</i> is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of <i>T</i> can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a <i>p</i>-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$L_{z}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mo>∗</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":"60 1","pages":"52-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Bayesian Person-Fit Analysis Method Using Pivotal Discrepancy Measures\",\"authors\":\"Adam Combs\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jedm.12342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mo>∗</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM <i>T</i> is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of <i>T</i> can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a <i>p</i>-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mo>∗</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"52-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在贝叶斯项目反应理论(IRT)中,检验个人拟合的常用方法是后验预测法(PP)。近年来,人们提出了基于重采样方法的更强大的方法,这些方法使用流行的L z∗$L_{z}^{*}$统计量。此外,还提出了一种基于关键差异测度(pdm)的贝叶斯模型检验方法。PDM T是一种差异度量,它是具有已知参考分布的关键量。使用标准马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗输出生成T的后验样本,根据样本的阶统计量计算概率界得到p值。在本文中,我们提出了一种将PDM方法应用于IRT模型中人拟合检验的一般程序。我们使用lz $L_{z}$和lz * $L_{z}^{*}$测度来说明这一点。将这些方法与PP方法和最近的一种重采样方法进行了仿真研究。结果表明,PDM方法比PP方法更有效。在某些条件下,它比重采样方法更强大,而在其他条件下,它更小。将PDM方法应用于实际数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Bayesian Person-Fit Analysis Method Using Pivotal Discrepancy Measures

A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular L z $L_{z}^{*}$ statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM T is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of T can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a p-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the L z $L_{z}$ and L z $L_{z}^{*}$ measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信