{"title":"使用关键差异度量的贝叶斯人-拟合分析新方法","authors":"Adam Combs","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular <math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mo>∗</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM <i>T</i> is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of <i>T</i> can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a <i>p</i>-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$L_{z}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mo>∗</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":"60 1","pages":"52-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Bayesian Person-Fit Analysis Method Using Pivotal Discrepancy Measures\",\"authors\":\"Adam Combs\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jedm.12342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mo>∗</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM <i>T</i> is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of <i>T</i> can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a <i>p</i>-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mo>∗</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <annotation>$L_{z}^{*}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"52-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
A New Bayesian Person-Fit Analysis Method Using Pivotal Discrepancy Measures
A common method of checking person-fit in Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is the posterior-predictive (PP) method. In recent years, more powerful approaches have been proposed that are based on resampling methods using the popular statistic. There has also been proposed a new Bayesian model checking method based on pivotal discrepancy measures (PDMs). A PDM T is a discrepancy measure that is a pivotal quantity with a known reference distribution. A posterior sample of T can be generated using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo output, and a p-value is obtained from probability bounds computed on order statistics of the sample. In this paper, we propose a general procedure to apply this PDM method to person-fit checking in IRT models. We illustrate this using the and measures. Simulation studies are done comparing these with the PP method and one of the more recent resampling methods. The results show that the PDM method is more powerful than the PP method. Under certain conditions, it is more powerful than the resampling method, while in others, it is less. The PDM method is also applied to a real data set.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.