评估印度尼西亚、菲律宾和泰国全民健康覆盖政策中公共服务合同的实施情况:政府工具方法

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ruechagorn Trairatananusorn
{"title":"评估印度尼西亚、菲律宾和泰国全民健康覆盖政策中公共服务合同的实施情况:政府工具方法","authors":"Ruechagorn Trairatananusorn","doi":"10.12982/cmujasr.2022.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Health and well-being are significant UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) in improving living conditions and guaranteeing human rights to adequate standard of living. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policy is recommended in achieving these SDGs. However, the existing literature on the implementation of public service contracting mechanism in the UHC policy mostly focused on the Anglophone countries or medical-based perspective. Little is known about the structure, management, and outcomes of UHC contracting in developing countries under the government tools perspective, especially in Southeast Asia. This paper thus adopts qualitative document research and applies Salamon’s government tools framework in assessing the implementation of public service contracting in the UHC policy in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. These countries were selected based on their relative similarities on the political regime, economic status, and the implementation of the UHC policy. The results suggest that while all countries demonstrate policy convergence on the use of multiple policy tools with public service contracting mechanism, which demonstrates the importance of the accountability structure in implementing UHC contract, different contexts in these countries also influence different UHC contracting structure, management, and outcomes. The results also provide supports and variations of the implementation of the POS contract against the previous observations. Key lessons learned for future public administration research and practice in UHC policy and government tools framework are also discussed. Keywords: Universal health coverage, Public service contract, Government tools approach, New public management, Southeast Asia","PeriodicalId":40330,"journal":{"name":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Implementation of Public Service Contracting in the Universal Health Coverage Policy in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand: The Government Tools Approach\",\"authors\":\"Ruechagorn Trairatananusorn\",\"doi\":\"10.12982/cmujasr.2022.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Health and well-being are significant UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) in improving living conditions and guaranteeing human rights to adequate standard of living. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policy is recommended in achieving these SDGs. However, the existing literature on the implementation of public service contracting mechanism in the UHC policy mostly focused on the Anglophone countries or medical-based perspective. Little is known about the structure, management, and outcomes of UHC contracting in developing countries under the government tools perspective, especially in Southeast Asia. This paper thus adopts qualitative document research and applies Salamon’s government tools framework in assessing the implementation of public service contracting in the UHC policy in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. These countries were selected based on their relative similarities on the political regime, economic status, and the implementation of the UHC policy. The results suggest that while all countries demonstrate policy convergence on the use of multiple policy tools with public service contracting mechanism, which demonstrates the importance of the accountability structure in implementing UHC contract, different contexts in these countries also influence different UHC contracting structure, management, and outcomes. The results also provide supports and variations of the implementation of the POS contract against the previous observations. Key lessons learned for future public administration research and practice in UHC policy and government tools framework are also discussed. Keywords: Universal health coverage, Public service contract, Government tools approach, New public management, Southeast Asia\",\"PeriodicalId\":40330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2022.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2022.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康和福祉是联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)的重要内容,旨在改善生活条件,保障人权获得适当的生活水平。建议采用全民健康覆盖政策来实现这些可持续发展目标。然而,现有文献对全民健康覆盖政策中公共服务承包机制实施的研究大多集中在英语国家或基于医学的视角。从政府工具的角度来看,发展中国家,特别是东南亚国家的全民健康覆盖承包的结构、管理和结果知之甚少。因此,本文采用定性文献研究,并将Salamon的政府工具框架应用于评估印度尼西亚、菲律宾和泰国全民健康覆盖政策中公共服务承包的实施情况。这些国家是根据它们在政治制度、经济状况和全民健康覆盖政策实施方面的相对相似性来选择的。研究结果表明,虽然所有国家在公共服务合同机制中使用多种政策工具方面都表现出政策趋同,这表明了问责制结构在实施全民健康覆盖合同中的重要性,但这些国家的不同背景也影响了不同的全民健康覆盖合同结构、管理和结果。与之前的观察结果相比,结果还提供了POS合约实现的支持和变化。还讨论了在全民健康覆盖政策和政府工具框架中为未来公共行政研究和实践吸取的主要经验教训。关键词:全民健康覆盖,公共服务合同,政府工具方法,新公共管理,东南亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Implementation of Public Service Contracting in the Universal Health Coverage Policy in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand: The Government Tools Approach
ABSTRACT Health and well-being are significant UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) in improving living conditions and guaranteeing human rights to adequate standard of living. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policy is recommended in achieving these SDGs. However, the existing literature on the implementation of public service contracting mechanism in the UHC policy mostly focused on the Anglophone countries or medical-based perspective. Little is known about the structure, management, and outcomes of UHC contracting in developing countries under the government tools perspective, especially in Southeast Asia. This paper thus adopts qualitative document research and applies Salamon’s government tools framework in assessing the implementation of public service contracting in the UHC policy in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. These countries were selected based on their relative similarities on the political regime, economic status, and the implementation of the UHC policy. The results suggest that while all countries demonstrate policy convergence on the use of multiple policy tools with public service contracting mechanism, which demonstrates the importance of the accountability structure in implementing UHC contract, different contexts in these countries also influence different UHC contracting structure, management, and outcomes. The results also provide supports and variations of the implementation of the POS contract against the previous observations. Key lessons learned for future public administration research and practice in UHC policy and government tools framework are also discussed. Keywords: Universal health coverage, Public service contract, Government tools approach, New public management, Southeast Asia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信