非本土作者研究论文摘要中套期保值的历时分析

IF 1 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES

Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I Pub Date : 2022-05-15 DOI:10.6035/clr.6221

O. Boginskaya

{"title":"非本土作者研究论文摘要中套期保值的历时分析","authors":"O. Boginskaya","doi":"10.6035/clr.6221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing part of studies on English for academic purpose explores how English is used in non-Anglophone contexts. This article focuses on the under-researched context of Russia, where English has been used as a language of scientific publications only since 2010. The paper explores hedging devices in Russian authors’ research article abstracts from a diachronic perspective. The main focus is on quantitative and qualitative variations in the use of these linguistic means. It is assumed their distribution could change over time. Exploring functions of hedges and suggesting reasons for diachronic changes in their use are other research questions. The weakening intrusion of national Russian criteria of good writing and greater awareness of English academic norms due to the need to publish internationally have influenced hedging patterns in Russian authors’ research article abstracts. The study is based on a corpus of 120 research article abstracts from the field of linguistics published in two Russian journals in 2010-2020. The theoretical framework followed here is Hyland’s (2000) taxonomy of hedges, which offers a pragmatically-grounded method for analyzing hedging in academic discourse","PeriodicalId":42176,"journal":{"name":"Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A diachronic analysis of hedging in non-native authors’ research article abstracts\",\"authors\":\"O. Boginskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.6035/clr.6221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growing part of studies on English for academic purpose explores how English is used in non-Anglophone contexts. This article focuses on the under-researched context of Russia, where English has been used as a language of scientific publications only since 2010. The paper explores hedging devices in Russian authors’ research article abstracts from a diachronic perspective. The main focus is on quantitative and qualitative variations in the use of these linguistic means. It is assumed their distribution could change over time. Exploring functions of hedges and suggesting reasons for diachronic changes in their use are other research questions. The weakening intrusion of national Russian criteria of good writing and greater awareness of English academic norms due to the need to publish internationally have influenced hedging patterns in Russian authors’ research article abstracts. The study is based on a corpus of 120 research article abstracts from the field of linguistics published in two Russian journals in 2010-2020. The theoretical framework followed here is Hyland’s (2000) taxonomy of hedges, which offers a pragmatically-grounded method for analyzing hedging in academic discourse\",\"PeriodicalId\":42176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.6221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.6221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的学术英语研究探讨了英语在非英语国家的语境中是如何使用的。本文关注的是俄罗斯尚未得到充分研究的背景，在俄罗斯，从2010年开始，英语才被用作科学出版物的语言。本文从历时的角度探讨了俄罗斯作者科研论文摘要中的模糊修辞手法。主要的重点是在使用这些语言手段的数量和质量的变化。假设它们的分布会随着时间的推移而改变。探索模糊限制语的功能和暗示其使用历时变化的原因是另一个研究问题。俄罗斯国家优秀写作标准的入侵减弱，以及由于国际出版的需要而对英语学术规范的认识增强，影响了俄罗斯作者研究论文摘要中的模糊措辞模式。这项研究基于2010年至2020年在两份俄罗斯期刊上发表的语言学领域120篇研究论文摘要的语料库。这里遵循的理论框架是Hyland(2000)的模糊限制语分类法，它为分析学术话语中的模糊限制语提供了一种基于实用主义的方法

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A diachronic analysis of hedging in non-native authors’ research article abstracts

A growing part of studies on English for academic purpose explores how English is used in non-Anglophone contexts. This article focuses on the under-researched context of Russia, where English has been used as a language of scientific publications only since 2010. The paper explores hedging devices in Russian authors’ research article abstracts from a diachronic perspective. The main focus is on quantitative and qualitative variations in the use of these linguistic means. It is assumed their distribution could change over time. Exploring functions of hedges and suggesting reasons for diachronic changes in their use are other research questions. The weakening intrusion of national Russian criteria of good writing and greater awareness of English academic norms due to the need to publish internationally have influenced hedging patterns in Russian authors’ research article abstracts. The study is based on a corpus of 120 research article abstracts from the field of linguistics published in two Russian journals in 2010-2020. The theoretical framework followed here is Hyland’s (2000) taxonomy of hedges, which offers a pragmatically-grounded method for analyzing hedging in academic discourse

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cultura Lenguaje y Representacion-Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I CULTURAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

25.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND REPRESENTATION (CLR) is a biannual scholarly publication devoted to the field of Culture and Linguistics Studies, whose scope is aimed at the international academic community. Alternatively, each issue deals either monographically with a relevant aspect of the linguistic representation of culture in its various manifestations (social, political, educational, literary, historical, etc.) or encourages interdisciplinary and innovative approaches to language and culture research. The Journal is committed to academic and research excellence by publishing relevant and original material that meets high scientific standards. Submission of a paper will be taken to imply that it is unpublished and is not being considered for publication elsewhere. Articles will undergo an independent evaluation by two external referees, who will advise the Editors on the suitability of their publication. Publishing elsewhere an article included in CLR needs the author''s acknowledgement that it has first appeared in the Journal. If in doubt, authors are advised to contact The Editors.