对问责制如何在循环经济中体现的定性检查

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
A. Kwarteng, Cletus Agyenim-Boateng, S. Simpson
{"title":"对问责制如何在循环经济中体现的定性检查","authors":"A. Kwarteng, Cletus Agyenim-Boateng, S. Simpson","doi":"10.1108/jgr-12-2021-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAccountability within the framework of circular economy (CE) is unknown even though the concept of CE is increasingly gaining momentum among governments, policymakers and academics. The purpose of this study is to investigate how accountability expresses itself in the CE.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study draws on the institutional logics theory and adopted an exploratory qualitative study aimed at eliciting stakeholders’ perspectives on how accountability manifests in the context of CE. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews of cross section of Ghanaians. Respondents were recruited using the purposeful sampling method, and data saturation was reached with 35 respondents. Concurrent data collection and analysis were carried out, and emerging themes were investigated as the research progressed.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that accountability manifestations take on a variety of forms and shapes through both formal and informal processes within the circularity space. The specific areas of accountability manifestations are through the social system embedded in the society, through the organization’s responsibility and transparency, through regular reporting to stakeholders using appropriate metrics, through agency and answerability to relevant stakeholders and through governance systems embedded within social interaction. Additionally, this study discovered that accountability manifestations would contribute to the firm’s sustainability by enhancing competitive advantage through stakeholder engagement, improving risk management and promoting creativity and innovation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nGiven an apparent gap in the literature on circularity and accountability, as well as a call for further studies on the reflections of accountability within the CE, this study provides empirical evidence to fill these gaps.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative examination of how accountability manifests itself in a circular economy\",\"authors\":\"A. Kwarteng, Cletus Agyenim-Boateng, S. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jgr-12-2021-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nAccountability within the framework of circular economy (CE) is unknown even though the concept of CE is increasingly gaining momentum among governments, policymakers and academics. The purpose of this study is to investigate how accountability expresses itself in the CE.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study draws on the institutional logics theory and adopted an exploratory qualitative study aimed at eliciting stakeholders’ perspectives on how accountability manifests in the context of CE. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews of cross section of Ghanaians. Respondents were recruited using the purposeful sampling method, and data saturation was reached with 35 respondents. Concurrent data collection and analysis were carried out, and emerging themes were investigated as the research progressed.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results indicate that accountability manifestations take on a variety of forms and shapes through both formal and informal processes within the circularity space. The specific areas of accountability manifestations are through the social system embedded in the society, through the organization’s responsibility and transparency, through regular reporting to stakeholders using appropriate metrics, through agency and answerability to relevant stakeholders and through governance systems embedded within social interaction. Additionally, this study discovered that accountability manifestations would contribute to the firm’s sustainability by enhancing competitive advantage through stakeholder engagement, improving risk management and promoting creativity and innovation.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nGiven an apparent gap in the literature on circularity and accountability, as well as a call for further studies on the reflections of accountability within the CE, this study provides empirical evidence to fill these gaps.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-12-2021-0107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-12-2021-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管循环经济的概念在政府、政策制定者和学者中越来越流行,但循环经济框架内的问责制仍然未知。本研究的目的是调查问责制如何在CE中表达。设计/方法/方法本研究借鉴了制度逻辑理论,并采用了一项探索性的定性研究,旨在激发利益相关者对问责制在CE中如何表现的看法。数据是通过对加纳各阶层的半结构化访谈收集的。采用有目的的抽样方法招募受访者,35名受访者的数据达到饱和。同时进行了数据收集和分析,并随着研究的进展对新出现的主题进行了调查。研究结果表明,在循环空间内,问责制表现形式通过正式和非正式过程呈现出多种形式和形态。问责制表现形式的具体领域是通过嵌入社会的社会制度,通过组织的责任和透明度,通过使用适当的衡量标准定期向利益攸关方报告,通过对相关利益攸关方的代理和责任,以及通过嵌入社会互动的治理系统。此外,这项研究发现,问责制的表现形式将通过利益相关者的参与、改进风险管理以及促进创造力和创新来增强竞争优势,从而有助于公司的可持续性。原创性/价值鉴于循环性和问责制的文献中存在明显的空白,以及对行政长官内部问责制反思的进一步研究的呼吁,本研究提供了填补这些空白的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative examination of how accountability manifests itself in a circular economy
Purpose Accountability within the framework of circular economy (CE) is unknown even though the concept of CE is increasingly gaining momentum among governments, policymakers and academics. The purpose of this study is to investigate how accountability expresses itself in the CE. Design/methodology/approach This study draws on the institutional logics theory and adopted an exploratory qualitative study aimed at eliciting stakeholders’ perspectives on how accountability manifests in the context of CE. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews of cross section of Ghanaians. Respondents were recruited using the purposeful sampling method, and data saturation was reached with 35 respondents. Concurrent data collection and analysis were carried out, and emerging themes were investigated as the research progressed. Findings The results indicate that accountability manifestations take on a variety of forms and shapes through both formal and informal processes within the circularity space. The specific areas of accountability manifestations are through the social system embedded in the society, through the organization’s responsibility and transparency, through regular reporting to stakeholders using appropriate metrics, through agency and answerability to relevant stakeholders and through governance systems embedded within social interaction. Additionally, this study discovered that accountability manifestations would contribute to the firm’s sustainability by enhancing competitive advantage through stakeholder engagement, improving risk management and promoting creativity and innovation. Originality/value Given an apparent gap in the literature on circularity and accountability, as well as a call for further studies on the reflections of accountability within the CE, this study provides empirical evidence to fill these gaps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信