二语写作情感的潜象分析及其与写作活力、动机和熟练度的关系

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Yabing Wang, Jian Xu
{"title":"二语写作情感的潜象分析及其与写作活力、动机和熟练度的关系","authors":"Yabing Wang, Jian Xu","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2022-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Second/foreign language (L2) writing emotions play an important role in language writing outcomes. However, extant literature was dominated by L2 anxiety with other types of emotions being neglected. Further, little is known about whether English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writers demonstrate heterogenous patterns of emotional experiences in English writing. The aim of the study was to identify intra-individual differences in EFL writing emotion patterns and how these patterns differed from each other in terms of writing buoyancy, motivation, and proficiency. Through convenience sampling, three hundred and sixty-three EFL undergraduates in China were recruited and they completed a battery of questionnaires. Latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a three-profile solution. They were labelled as the “positive type” (PT), “negative type” (NT) and “moderate type” (MT). Three groups reported significantly different levels of writing buoyancy and motivation with the highest scores of them being found among the PT group, followed by MT, and lastly NT. The writing proficiency was higher for the PT group than for the NT group, but the PT group did not differ from the NT or MT group. The dominance of MT group suggested that most students exhibited mild attitudes toward EFL writing. The distinct patterns of EFL writing emotions and their influences on writing outcomes suggested that teachers should boost students’ emotional learning competence and adjust the teaching approach accordingly.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A latent profile analysis of L2 writing emotions and their relations to writing buoyancy, motivation and proficiency\",\"authors\":\"Yabing Wang, Jian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/applirev-2022-0080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Second/foreign language (L2) writing emotions play an important role in language writing outcomes. However, extant literature was dominated by L2 anxiety with other types of emotions being neglected. Further, little is known about whether English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writers demonstrate heterogenous patterns of emotional experiences in English writing. The aim of the study was to identify intra-individual differences in EFL writing emotion patterns and how these patterns differed from each other in terms of writing buoyancy, motivation, and proficiency. Through convenience sampling, three hundred and sixty-three EFL undergraduates in China were recruited and they completed a battery of questionnaires. Latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a three-profile solution. They were labelled as the “positive type” (PT), “negative type” (NT) and “moderate type” (MT). Three groups reported significantly different levels of writing buoyancy and motivation with the highest scores of them being found among the PT group, followed by MT, and lastly NT. The writing proficiency was higher for the PT group than for the NT group, but the PT group did not differ from the NT or MT group. The dominance of MT group suggested that most students exhibited mild attitudes toward EFL writing. The distinct patterns of EFL writing emotions and their influences on writing outcomes suggested that teachers should boost students’ emotional learning competence and adjust the teaching approach accordingly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:第二语言/外语写作情绪在语言写作效果中起着重要作用。然而,现有文献以第二语言焦虑为主,忽视了其他类型的情绪。此外,关于英语作为外语的作者在英语写作中是否表现出异质的情感体验模式,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定英语写作情感模式的个体内部差异,以及这些模式在写作轻快性、动机和熟练程度方面的差异。通过方便抽样的方法,我们招募了三百六十三名中国的英语本科生,他们完成了一系列的问卷调查。潜剖面分析(LPA)揭示了一个三剖面的解决方案。他们被标记为“阳性型”(PT)、“阴性型”(NT)和“中度型”(MT)。三组学生的写作浮力和写作动机水平均有显著差异,其中PT组得分最高,其次是MT组,最后是NT组。PT组的写作熟练程度高于NT组,但PT组与NT或MT组没有差异。MT组的优势表明,大多数学生对英语写作的态度较为温和。英语写作情绪的独特模式及其对写作效果的影响表明,教师应提高学生的情绪学习能力,并相应地调整教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A latent profile analysis of L2 writing emotions and their relations to writing buoyancy, motivation and proficiency
Abstract Second/foreign language (L2) writing emotions play an important role in language writing outcomes. However, extant literature was dominated by L2 anxiety with other types of emotions being neglected. Further, little is known about whether English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writers demonstrate heterogenous patterns of emotional experiences in English writing. The aim of the study was to identify intra-individual differences in EFL writing emotion patterns and how these patterns differed from each other in terms of writing buoyancy, motivation, and proficiency. Through convenience sampling, three hundred and sixty-three EFL undergraduates in China were recruited and they completed a battery of questionnaires. Latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a three-profile solution. They were labelled as the “positive type” (PT), “negative type” (NT) and “moderate type” (MT). Three groups reported significantly different levels of writing buoyancy and motivation with the highest scores of them being found among the PT group, followed by MT, and lastly NT. The writing proficiency was higher for the PT group than for the NT group, but the PT group did not differ from the NT or MT group. The dominance of MT group suggested that most students exhibited mild attitudes toward EFL writing. The distinct patterns of EFL writing emotions and their influences on writing outcomes suggested that teachers should boost students’ emotional learning competence and adjust the teaching approach accordingly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信