智力遗传力的群体差异:对Giangrande和Turkheimer(2022)的回答

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Bryan J. Pesta , Jan te Nijenhuis , Jordan Lasker , Emil O.W. Kirkegaard , John G.R. Fuerst
{"title":"智力遗传力的群体差异:对Giangrande和Turkheimer(2022)的回答","authors":"Bryan J. Pesta ,&nbsp;Jan te Nijenhuis ,&nbsp;Jordan Lasker ,&nbsp;Emil O.W. Kirkegaard ,&nbsp;John G.R. Fuerst","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&amp;T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in <em>Intelligence</em><span> regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&amp;T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&amp;T published their critique in </span><em>Perspectives on Psychological Science</em> (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)\",\"authors\":\"Bryan J. Pesta ,&nbsp;Jan te Nijenhuis ,&nbsp;Jordan Lasker ,&nbsp;Emil O.W. Kirkegaard ,&nbsp;John G.R. Fuerst\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&amp;T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in <em>Intelligence</em><span> regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&amp;T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&amp;T published their critique in </span><em>Perspectives on Psychological Science</em> (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,我们对詹格兰德和图克海默(2022;G&T)最近对我们发表在《情报》上的关于Scarr-Rowe假设的荟萃分析的批评,以及智力遗传能力明显缺乏假定的种族/民族差异(Pesta et al., 2020)。我们的反驳分为三个部分,以解决他们批评中普遍存在的错误陈述:第1部分侧重于概念和理论要点。第2节讨论了方法、统计和解释要点。第3节提供了G&T提出的支持我们原始解释的新分析。我们注意到,G&T在《心理科学展望》(PoPS)上发表了他们的批评,在他们的论文发表之前没有邀请我们回应,我们随后提交的反驳也没有被接受。基于可能违反道德规范的原因,我们对这些事件的失败申诉详见此处(附录E)。我们认识到,这是一个有争议的研究领域,存在合理的分歧,希望我们的回应保持一定程度的严谨性和专业性,以使其他人可以效仿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)

Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in Intelligence regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&T published their critique in Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our subsequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信