伊维菌素(400 ug/kg,单剂量)治疗重症COVID-19患者的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验

Q3 Medicine
Infectio Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.22354/24223794.1105
F. Ochoa-Jaramillo, Federico Rodríguez-Vega, N. Cardona-Castro, Verónica Posada-Vélez, D. Rojas-Gualdrón, Heidy Contreras-Martínez, A. Romero-Millan, Jessica Porras-Mansilla
{"title":"伊维菌素(400 ug/kg,单剂量)治疗重症COVID-19患者的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验","authors":"F. Ochoa-Jaramillo, Federico Rodríguez-Vega, N. Cardona-Castro, Verónica Posada-Vélez, D. Rojas-Gualdrón, Heidy Contreras-Martínez, A. Romero-Millan, Jessica Porras-Mansilla","doi":"10.22354/24223794.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of including Ivermectin (single dose on day 1 of 400 ug/kg PO) in the standard of care in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19. Methods: Double-blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard of care plus ivermectin or placebo and were followed up for 21 days. Primary outcome measure was admission to ICU and secondary outcomes were the requirement of intensive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and in-hospital death. Intention-to-treat analyses, estimated risk differences (RD), and Hazard ratios (HR) with Cox regression were performed. Results: Enrollment stopped due to the lack of eligible patients. Thirty-seven patients were assigned to intervention and 38 to placebo. Patients in the ivermectin group were 54.5 years on average, 62.2% were male. Comorbidities were more prevalent in the control group (78.9% vs. 56.8%). There was no difference in the 21-day risk of admission to the ICU between ivermectin (21.6%) and placebo (15.8%) (RD= 5.8%; 95%CI: -11.8%-23.5%); neither in the risk of requirement of IMV (18.9% vs 13.2%), mortality (5.4% vs 10.5%) or in adverse events (32.4% vs. 28.9%). Discussion: Ivermectin showed no significant benefit in reducing the requirement of ICU, IMV, or mortality for severe COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":38132,"journal":{"name":"Infectio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy and safety of ivermectin (400 ug/kg, single dose) in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"F. Ochoa-Jaramillo, Federico Rodríguez-Vega, N. Cardona-Castro, Verónica Posada-Vélez, D. Rojas-Gualdrón, Heidy Contreras-Martínez, A. Romero-Millan, Jessica Porras-Mansilla\",\"doi\":\"10.22354/24223794.1105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of including Ivermectin (single dose on day 1 of 400 ug/kg PO) in the standard of care in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19. Methods: Double-blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard of care plus ivermectin or placebo and were followed up for 21 days. Primary outcome measure was admission to ICU and secondary outcomes were the requirement of intensive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and in-hospital death. Intention-to-treat analyses, estimated risk differences (RD), and Hazard ratios (HR) with Cox regression were performed. Results: Enrollment stopped due to the lack of eligible patients. Thirty-seven patients were assigned to intervention and 38 to placebo. Patients in the ivermectin group were 54.5 years on average, 62.2% were male. Comorbidities were more prevalent in the control group (78.9% vs. 56.8%). There was no difference in the 21-day risk of admission to the ICU between ivermectin (21.6%) and placebo (15.8%) (RD= 5.8%; 95%CI: -11.8%-23.5%); neither in the risk of requirement of IMV (18.9% vs 13.2%), mortality (5.4% vs 10.5%) or in adverse events (32.4% vs. 28.9%). Discussion: Ivermectin showed no significant benefit in reducing the requirement of ICU, IMV, or mortality for severe COVID-19 patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22354/24223794.1105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22354/24223794.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在重症新冠肺炎住院成人护理标准中加入伊维菌素(第一天单剂量400微克/千克PO)的临床疗效。方法:双盲、平行、安慰剂对照、单中心、随机临床试验。75名患者被随机分配(1:1)接受标准护理加伊维菌素或安慰剂治疗,并随访21天。主要转归指标是入住ICU,次要转归指标是是否需要强化机械通气(IMV)和住院死亡。采用Cox回归进行意向治疗分析、估计风险差异(RD)和危险比(HR)。结果:由于缺乏符合条件的患者,注册停止。37名患者接受干预,38名患者接受安慰剂治疗。伊维菌素组的患者平均年龄为54.5岁,62.2%为男性。合并症在对照组中更为普遍(78.9%对56.8%)。伊维菌素(21.6%)和安慰剂(15.8%)在入住ICU的21天风险方面没有差异(RD=5.8%;95%CI:-11.8%-23.5%);无论是在IMV需求风险(18.9%对13.2%)、死亡率(5.4%对10.5%)或不良事件风险(32.4%对28.9%)方面。讨论:伊维菌素在降低重症新冠肺炎患者的ICU需求、IMV或死亡率方面均无显著益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy and safety of ivermectin (400 ug/kg, single dose) in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of including Ivermectin (single dose on day 1 of 400 ug/kg PO) in the standard of care in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19. Methods: Double-blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard of care plus ivermectin or placebo and were followed up for 21 days. Primary outcome measure was admission to ICU and secondary outcomes were the requirement of intensive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and in-hospital death. Intention-to-treat analyses, estimated risk differences (RD), and Hazard ratios (HR) with Cox regression were performed. Results: Enrollment stopped due to the lack of eligible patients. Thirty-seven patients were assigned to intervention and 38 to placebo. Patients in the ivermectin group were 54.5 years on average, 62.2% were male. Comorbidities were more prevalent in the control group (78.9% vs. 56.8%). There was no difference in the 21-day risk of admission to the ICU between ivermectin (21.6%) and placebo (15.8%) (RD= 5.8%; 95%CI: -11.8%-23.5%); neither in the risk of requirement of IMV (18.9% vs 13.2%), mortality (5.4% vs 10.5%) or in adverse events (32.4% vs. 28.9%). Discussion: Ivermectin showed no significant benefit in reducing the requirement of ICU, IMV, or mortality for severe COVID-19 patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectio
Infectio Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信