热味觉状态分类图式的检验与验证

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience
Margaret Thibodeau, Anthony Saliba, Martha Bajec, Gary Pickering
{"title":"热味觉状态分类图式的检验与验证","authors":"Margaret Thibodeau,&nbsp;Anthony Saliba,&nbsp;Martha Bajec,&nbsp;Gary Pickering","doi":"10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Thermal taster status (TTS) is determined when the tongue is cooled or warmed, whereby thermal tasters (TT) experience a taste sensation while thermal nontasters (TnT) do not. The literature suggests that TT experience greater responsiveness (higher intensity ratings) to orosensory stimuli; however, small sample sizes and differences in classification schemes between studies confound our understanding of TTS. In addition, up to 50% of individuals (nonclassifiables, NC) have been excluded from previous studies and have yet to be characterized.</p><p>Raw responses to the thermal-elicitation procedure were used to determine the TTS of the same participants using four published classification schemes, and concordance between the schemes was examined using Fleiss’ kappa. Using a large convenience sample (<i>n</i>?=?708), we tested for differences in orosensory (ANOVA) and temperature (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>) responsiveness between TT, TnT, and NC.</p><p>TT are more responsive than TnT to both orosensations and temperature changes, regardless of the classification method used despite only moderate concordance between the schemes. Overall, the orosensory and temperature responsiveness of NC is intermediate to that of TT and TnT. However, the responses of NC are not homogeneous and subgroups are identified.</p><p>The trend of TT being more responsive to orosensory and temperature stimuli is confirmed. The responsiveness patterns of NC subgroups suggest they are misclassified TT and TnT, and can be included in future studies examining thermal tasting.</p><p>TTS is an important source of individual differences in orosensory responsiveness, and our findings inform best practices for thermal elicitation and classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":"12 2","pages":"69 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination and Validation of Classification Schema for Determining Thermal Taste Status\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Thibodeau,&nbsp;Anthony Saliba,&nbsp;Martha Bajec,&nbsp;Gary Pickering\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Thermal taster status (TTS) is determined when the tongue is cooled or warmed, whereby thermal tasters (TT) experience a taste sensation while thermal nontasters (TnT) do not. The literature suggests that TT experience greater responsiveness (higher intensity ratings) to orosensory stimuli; however, small sample sizes and differences in classification schemes between studies confound our understanding of TTS. In addition, up to 50% of individuals (nonclassifiables, NC) have been excluded from previous studies and have yet to be characterized.</p><p>Raw responses to the thermal-elicitation procedure were used to determine the TTS of the same participants using four published classification schemes, and concordance between the schemes was examined using Fleiss’ kappa. Using a large convenience sample (<i>n</i>?=?708), we tested for differences in orosensory (ANOVA) and temperature (Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>) responsiveness between TT, TnT, and NC.</p><p>TT are more responsive than TnT to both orosensations and temperature changes, regardless of the classification method used despite only moderate concordance between the schemes. Overall, the orosensory and temperature responsiveness of NC is intermediate to that of TT and TnT. However, the responses of NC are not homogeneous and subgroups are identified.</p><p>The trend of TT being more responsive to orosensory and temperature stimuli is confirmed. The responsiveness patterns of NC subgroups suggest they are misclassified TT and TnT, and can be included in future studies examining thermal tasting.</p><p>TTS is an important source of individual differences in orosensory responsiveness, and our findings inform best practices for thermal elicitation and classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemosensory Perception\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"69 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemosensory Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

热品尝者状态(TTS)是在舌头被冷却或加热时确定的,因此热品尝者(TT)体验到味觉,而热非品尝者(TnT)没有。文献表明,TT对感官刺激有更高的反应性(更高的强度等级);然而,小样本量和研究之间分类方案的差异使我们对TTS的理解困惑。此外,高达50%的个体(不可分类,NC)已被排除在先前的研究之外,尚未被表征。对热激发程序的原始反应被用来确定同一参与者使用四种已发表的分类方案的TTS,并使用Fleiss ' kappa检查方案之间的一致性。使用大样本(n = 708),我们检验了TT、TnT和NC在感官(ANOVA)和温度(Mann-Whitney U)反应性方面的差异。无论采用何种分类方法,TT都比TnT对感官和温度变化的响应更大,尽管两者之间只有适度的一致性。总的来说,NC的感官和温度反应性处于TT和TnT的中间水平。然而,NC的反应不是均匀的,并且确定了亚群。证实了TT对感官和温度刺激的反应更强的趋势。NC亚群的反应模式表明它们被错误地分类为TT和TnT,并且可以包括在未来的热味觉研究中。TTS是口腔感觉反应个体差异的重要来源,我们的研究结果为热激发和分类提供了最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examination and Validation of Classification Schema for Determining Thermal Taste Status

Examination and Validation of Classification Schema for Determining Thermal Taste Status

Thermal taster status (TTS) is determined when the tongue is cooled or warmed, whereby thermal tasters (TT) experience a taste sensation while thermal nontasters (TnT) do not. The literature suggests that TT experience greater responsiveness (higher intensity ratings) to orosensory stimuli; however, small sample sizes and differences in classification schemes between studies confound our understanding of TTS. In addition, up to 50% of individuals (nonclassifiables, NC) have been excluded from previous studies and have yet to be characterized.

Raw responses to the thermal-elicitation procedure were used to determine the TTS of the same participants using four published classification schemes, and concordance between the schemes was examined using Fleiss’ kappa. Using a large convenience sample (n?=?708), we tested for differences in orosensory (ANOVA) and temperature (Mann-Whitney U) responsiveness between TT, TnT, and NC.

TT are more responsive than TnT to both orosensations and temperature changes, regardless of the classification method used despite only moderate concordance between the schemes. Overall, the orosensory and temperature responsiveness of NC is intermediate to that of TT and TnT. However, the responses of NC are not homogeneous and subgroups are identified.

The trend of TT being more responsive to orosensory and temperature stimuli is confirmed. The responsiveness patterns of NC subgroups suggest they are misclassified TT and TnT, and can be included in future studies examining thermal tasting.

TTS is an important source of individual differences in orosensory responsiveness, and our findings inform best practices for thermal elicitation and classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信